BigDaddy5 Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 No, not everything. Einstein postulated that light travels at 3e8 m/s in all reference frames, stationary or moving. Which has nothing to do with what I said. I said that for objects traveling at near the speed of light in our reference frame, we're traveling at that speed to them, in the opposite direction. It had nothing to do with the speed of light across reference frames. If an object where traveling at .8C in one direction, it wouldn't know it and would believe it where stationary while everything else was traveling at .8C in the opposite direction. I guess I see what your saying, yes light wouldn't travel backwards to it, nor would it assume that light is moving at -1.8C and .2C in the rear and forward directions. But, now, do you know why or how the speed of light is conserved? It's a fundamental special relativity solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclingplatypus Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 I like "by the end of the next century", that's a pretty safe bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jokeripa Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 Nothings impossible, only impropable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leovanham Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 i have 1 qeustion if time travel is to exist in the future why arent we getting travlers from the future or would thath be in a other universe? because this one is already "made" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jgrodri Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 :D Lol at NI3NOr for being "pretty Septic" hahaha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illicit Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 cool. i'll take 14 'anti-gravity weightlessly falling acceleration' devices. Nice... :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamz Veteran Posted February 13, 2006 Veteran Share Posted February 13, 2006 moved here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Derf Veteran Posted February 13, 2006 Veteran Share Posted February 13, 2006 Nothings impossible, only impropable. Yes, it was highly improbable that two oncoming missiles would suddenly shape-change into a sperm whale and a potted plant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincent Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 Yes, it was highly improbable that two oncoming missiles would suddenly shape-change into a sperm whale and a potted plant. I prefer bistromathics drives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts