Intel beats AMD with new CPU! Hell FrozeN?


Recommended Posts

I have now finished reading this thread.

My conclusion .. GET LAID. :rolleyes:

whoops, guess computer hardware isn't a hobby anymore...i guess liking something and reading is suddenly not cool...o wait it never was..

why are you even registered? 712 posts of flamebait? that's got to be impressive...

so what's filling all that empty space in YOUR head?

Sorry if this was answered already but will the new Core processors use LGA775? I'm looking to by a new motherboard soon and I was going with an Athlon 64 system, but after reading this I must say I'm intrigued by the possibility of getting an Intel motherboard now and maybe upgrading to one of these new chips when they are released.

No socket change, might require new chipset though...so I wouldn't make any buying decisions yet. It's quite a while to wait though...

Oh and thanks to Mako360 over at [H] for compiling this from the various IDF reports...

Six versions of the Conroe processor at launch:

Conroe Extreme Edition (XE): 3.0GHz or more, 1333MHz FSB, 4MB shared L2 cache, unknown price.

E6700: 2.66 GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 4 MB shared L2 cache, $530.

E6600: 2.40 GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 4 MB shared L2 cache, $316.

E6400: 2.13 GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 2 MB shared L2 cache, $241.

E6300: 1.86 GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 2 MB shared L2 cache, $209.

E4200: 1.60 GHz, 800MHz FSB, 2 MB shared L2 cache, uknown price.

Corresponding platform chipset launch:

P965, Q965, G965: Introduces ICH8 southbridge, support for DDR2-800, 1,066MHz/1333MHz FSB speeds. "Q" and "G" models offer integrated Intel GMA graphics.

Sorry if this was answered already but will the new Core processors use LGA775? I'm looking to by a new motherboard soon and I was going with an Athlon 64 system, but after reading this I must say I'm intrigued by the possibility of getting an Intel motherboard now and maybe upgrading to one of these new chips when they are released.

As far as I know, the first generation will use the current socket and chipset.

I still stand by what i said.. even if people are just going to ignore it... and besides.. AMD still has 6 months to come up with a good competitor... and 6 months in the technology world is a long time.. i wouldnt count AMD out of the loop just cause you see a few benchmarks of Intel's new chip vs AMD's current chip.. (even tho i dont think it was a far test... seeing how the BIOS of the board didnt fully support the FX-60.. so yeah...)

btw.. heres another site regarding the "benchmark"

http://sharikou.blogspot.com/2006/03/was-a...d-by-intel.html

just read it.. you might realize something, you might think its a lie.. doesnt matter.. it might even change your mind on this topic... Anandtech did their test in an Intel controlled enviorment.. how do we know they didnt tamper with the AMD system to make it look like the Intel is ALOT faster than the AMD.. maybe is just a little bit faster or not at all.. we would never know but still this is what I believe in..

I still stand by what i said.. even if people are just going to ignore it... and besides.. AMD still has 6 months to come up with a good competitor... and 6 months in the technology world is a long time.. i wouldnt count AMD out of the loop just cause you see a few benchmarks of Intel's new chip vs AMD's current chip.. (even tho i dont think it was a far test... seeing how the BIOS of the board didnt fully support the FX-60.. so yeah...)

btw.. heres another site regarding the "benchmark"

http://sharikou.blogspot.com/2006/03/was-a...d-by-intel.html

just read it.. you might realize something, you might think its a lie.. doesnt matter.. it might even change your mind on this topic... Anandtech did their test in an Intel controlled enviorment.. how do we know they didnt tamper with the AMD system to make it look like the Intel is ALOT faster than the AMD.. maybe is just a little bit faster or not at all.. we would never know but still this is what I believe in..

If you think the test is rigged, compare it to other reference benchmarks with similar settings. Such as here. Sure, we see that the Intel supplied OC'ed AMD system is actually slower than a normal FX-60, but I doubt OCing the same reference FX-60 would have caused that big of a jump:

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2006/03/08/in...benchmark_fear/

Why are so many people taking these benchmarks at such face value?

I'm sure conroe will be a very good chip and put Intel back on top so to speak but those benchmarks show the conroe giving upto a 50% increase over the top of the line P4, when did you last see a new CPU that was 50% faster than the current top of the line?

Until Intel start handing out chips to testers i'll take these benchmarks with a massive pinch of salt thanks.

Same LOL, as some guys psoted before on here

http://sharikou.blogspot.com/2006/03/was-a...d-by-intel.html

read throught it got some intresting stuff. there is deffinatly somthing fishy with those benchmarks and i think we should all wait till those chips actually get sent off to testers and then see what the benchmarks are.

Blah blah blah.

Has anybody bothered to read part II of the Conroe article at Anandtech?

They got Intel to update the bios on the AMD machine which closed the FX to Controe gap in the FEAR benchmark only. The rest of the benches were the same and any change was small enough to fall into the usual error margin.

http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2716

Intel is still 20% > AMD.

because you can eally tell the difference between 350(AMD) and 532(INTEL)frames per second

Because AMD has been beat :)

You all knew it was coming.

I will NEVER in a billion years ever buy a Intel :x :x

Fanboy.

Why not?

Maybe cause hes a Fanboy?

Why is that?

Again, He's a Fanboy.

AMD fanboys are in denial HAHAHA

Yes! :laugh:

I am for certain AMD will respond and win.

Nah. I doubt that, Ive always seen Intel as my chosen processor, and for a reason :)

huh? I've used nothing but AMDs on my personal computer for about 8-9 years now, and never had any problems with overheating... in fact, no problems at all. One the other hand, I knew plenty of people that had problems with Intel chips (not overheating, though), and that's why I stuck to AMD. I've always preferred them, and I'm not sure what you're talking about.

Every AMD I had over heated, either that or got very high in tempreture. And Ive had no problems with any intel over the last 8 or 9 Years.

What makes AMD's product truly better?

Reliability? Got any hard numbers to back this up?

This is a good example of how not to post.

u wanna relax a little with the "This is a good example of how not to post"....ur just soo much better then everyone aren't u...lol

Nah. I doubt that, Ive always seen Intel as my chosen processor, and for a reason :)

Every AMD I had over heated, either that or got very high in tempreture. And Ive had no problems with any intel over the last 8 or 9 Years.

Fanboy? AMD's run very cool, often cooler than Intels.

I dont personally like to take benchmarks on face value or I'll wait for more test from around the place. If they have indeed overtaken AMD then good for them and good for computer users. I dont personally care who is faster, I prefer amd as a company but a faster cpu is a faster cpu so this is good news for computing. EWspecially since we had a while back there where cpu performance seemed to freeze still with not alot happening due to design difficulties.

Lets watch AMD jump back. They will do it at some point, I mean intel just managed once for what seems like the first time in YEARS so theres no reason AMD cant bounce back.

Anyway exciting news, especially since I want a new system a year from now, means I might have something worth getting then.

I like how all the Intel fans (myself Included) said that Intel would bounce back like all good companies do. I also remember all the AMD pets not being able to come to grips with this.

Owned

AMD's run very cool, often cooler than Intels

Thats just plain wrong. AMD runs at a much higher temperature than intel - simple.

Nah. I doubt that, Ive always seen Intel as my chosen processor, and for a reason :)

And that reason is......

I'm very satisfied with my AMD and I will not be changed on these few results

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!