Intel beats AMD with new CPU! Hell FrozeN?


Recommended Posts

Sweet. Is the Conroe a P4? Are they ever going to do a P5?

The Intel Core Microarchitecture is Intel's new processor architecture. Announced in Q1 2006, to be released later in the year, it will replace the old NetBurst and Pentium M microarchitectures.

The architecture features low power usage, multiple cores, Virtualization Technology, and EM64T.

The first processors that will use this architecture are code-named Merom, Conroe, and Woodcrest; Merom is for mobile computing, Conroe is for desktop systems, and Woodcrest, which is expected to feature the most cores and technologies of all those processors, is for servers.

According to industry reports, the Pentium name will be retired with the introduction of Conroe, Merom and Woodcrest.

On 7 March 2006, at IDF Intel announced the official name of this microarchitecture to be the Intel Core Microarchitecture.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Next_Ge...croarchitecture

The conroe will be cheaper than what the newest amd out at that time will cost.

Remember the benchmarks compared what will be intels medium line processor vs what will be amd's top of the line processor.

The extreme edition of the conroe will be the top of the line processor by then.

Also the conroe is supposed to produce a lot less heat.

by that time I should be building a new computer. If the conroe is out and cheaper then the competing amd then i will buy it simple as that. If amd's processor is cheaper and offers the same performance i will buy that.

But their is a lot of false information going around here.

I like how all the Intel fans (myself Included) said that Intel would bounce back like all good companies do. I also remember all the AMD pets not being able to come to grips with this.

Owned

If Intel didn't bounce back it would be the stupidest (and most wasteful) company on the planet.

Intel is more than 7 times bigger than AMD.

While Intel was behind (2.5 years), they spent $15 billion on research & development (large portion still on CPUs). More than 5 times what AMD spent, and in total, more than what AMD is worth as a company.

So you're saying the Athlon64 series runs hotter than the P4? I wonder... 30 degrees Celsius vs 50.

dL

Athlon 64 runs cooler than the latest P4s...but, historically, AMDs have been the stovetops. Its not all about what's available right now, but the reputation that the company has had over a long period of time. Intels reputation is much better than AMDs.

Athlon 64 runs cooler than the latest P4s...but, historically, AMDs have been the stovetops. Its not all about what's available right now, but the reputation that the company has had over a long period of time. Intels reputation is much better than AMDs.

Well said.

Athlon 64 runs cooler than the latest P4s...but, historically, AMDs have been the stovetops. Its not all about what's available right now, but the reputation that the company has had over a long period of time. Intels reputation is much better than AMDs.

Exactly, my Athlon XP 1900+ runs about 30 degrees© above room temperature with the srock HSF, my Athlon64 3200+ runs only about 2 degrees above room temperature.

THe deal with Skype isn't anticompetitive. It's very competitive. AMD should try to get skype to cancel, or cut their own deals, instead of whining about it.

And this is why you will never be a business man. You fail at logic.

You're saying it's competitive to not allow the competition face the company in a certain piece of software? This is why we have antitrust laws but sadly these deals still make their way through but I got a feeling AMD will win in their lawsuit against Intel on this one.

The problem is that Skype makes you think that only Intel CPU's can allow 10-way conference. Heres where it doesn't make sense. In 2-3 years, will AMD cpus still be insufficient? or 5 years, try 10 for that matter? There's no logic behind this kind of statement. They're indirectly saying "We favor Intel because they give us a lot of money so AMD users buzz off".

You can't just make a deal like that with a company that their products have been previously used by all users who had hardware seen as equal and then all of a sudden, penalise one manufacturer by making a stupid claim without any technical information given to support it.

That's competition for you? Clearly you have no clue of true and fair competition.

And this is why you will never be a business man. You fail at logic.

You're saying it's competitive to not allow the competition face the company in a certain piece of software? This is why we have antitrust laws but sadly these deals still make their way through but I got a feeling AMD will win in their lawsuit against Intel on this one.

The problem is that Skype makes you think that only Intel CPU's can allow 10-way conference. Heres where it doesn't make sense. In 2-3 years, will AMD cpus still be insufficient? or 5 years, try 10 for that matter? There's no logic behind this kind of statement. They're indirectly saying "We favor Intel because they give us a lot of money so AMD users buzz off".

You can't just make a deal like that with a company that their products have been previously used by all users who had hardware seen as equal and then all of a sudden, penalise one manufacturer by making a stupid claim without any technical information given to support it.

That's competition for you? Clearly you have no clue of true and fair competition.

Don't be retarded. Sure it makes you think the p4 has capabilities it doesn't. But that's irrelevant. Companies do stuff like this all the time. It's business. You can't play your own mp3s on alot of mp3 capable cell phones, because the service won't allow it. thats not anticompetitive, and its no different from this. Its an artificial limitation. And its perfectly legal. You wanna show me otherwise? Then dig up some law.Now shut your mouth and quit whining.

Thats just plain wrong. AMD runs at a much higher temperature than intel - simple.

And that reason is......

I'm very satisfied with my AMD and I will not be changed on these few results

Really, why don't you do some research before posting next time.

So you're saying the Athlon64 series runs hotter than the P4? I wonder... 30 degrees Celsius vs 50.

dL

don't be so hard on him man, he was born in the 90's!

Don't be retarded. Sure it makes you think the p4 has capabilities it doesn't. But that's irrelevant. Companies do stuff like this all the time. It's business. You can't play your own mp3s on alot of mp3 capable cell phones, because the service won't allow it. thats not anticompetitive, and its no different from this. Its an artificial limitation. And its perfectly legal. You wanna show me otherwise? Then dig up some law.Now shut your mouth and quit whining.

Some law? What, you mean like the United States Department of Justice: Antitrust Division that has been established for a good while to fight anti-competitive business deals? Or how about the Europeen Antitrust laws? Or the Canadian Competition Bureau ? Clearly you have no concept in making a distinction between fair business deals among companies and anti-competitive deals. How about you open your favorite search engine (I won't link to google cause you might think I just made an anti-competitive deal with Google :rofl: ) and just search "Anti Trust". Maybe then you'll understand.

Until then, have a good one :p

Some law? What, you mean like the United States Department of Justice: Antitrust Division that has been established for a good while to fight anti-competitive business deals? Or how about the Europeen Antitrust laws? Or the Canadian Competition Bureau ? Clearly you have no concept in making a distinction between fair business deals among companies and anti-competitive deals. How about you open your favorite search engine (I won't link to google cause you might think I just made an anti-competitive deal with Google :rofl: ) and just search "Anti Trust". Maybe then you'll understand.

Until then, have a good one :p

You didn't answer my question. Ore explain how this is different from cellular services denying the ability to use your own MP3s. Mentioning a department of government doesn't prove anything. Now either bring some law in, or go away.

You didn't answer my question. Ore explain how this is different from cellular services denying the ability to use your own MP3s. Mentioning a department of government doesn't prove anything. Now either bring some law in, or go away.

Yeah you're telling me. What do departments within a goverment do huh? Yeah I know, they eat ice cream and watch movies of Chuck Norris geez, what a bunch of lazy hobos! :rolleyes:

Sony invented Betamax to duke it out against JVC's VHS format. Betamax, which was very proprietary (like Sony's Minidiscs) did not affect or penalize JVC's products or services and did not actually deteriorate JVC's performance.

Apple provide AAC, Real provides RealAudio, Microsoft provides WMA. Each of these obviously run on certain type of hardware and that is fine. Why is it fine? Because it does not affect the competitors true performance.

Here, we have a piece of software that actually penalizes a company by favoring another one for absolutely no reason other than money. There is not a single piece of technical information behind Skype's deal with Intel so that makes it even worse because they claim that only P4's can provide 10-way conference. If there were, Skype would of explained it from the very beginning to avoid all this "Skype/Intel vs AMD" thing that they anticipated.

Period. :rofl:

Yeah you're telling me. What do departments within a goverment do huh? Yeah I know, they eat ice cream and watch movies of Chuck Norris geez, what a bunch of lazy hobos! :rolleyes:

Sony invented Betamax to duke it out against JVC's VHS format. Betamax, which was very proprietary (like Sony's Minidiscs) did not affect or penalize JVC's products or services and did not actually deteriorate JVC's performance.

Apple provide AAC, Real provides RealAudio, Microsoft provides WMA. Each of these obviously run on certain type of hardware and that is fine. Why is it fine? Because it does not affect the competitors true performance.

Here, we have a piece of software that actually penalizes a company by favoring another one for absolutely no reason other than money. There is not a single piece of technical information behind Skype's deal with Intel so that makes it even worse because they claim that only P4's can provide 10-way conference. If there were, Skype would of explained it from the very beginning to avoid all this "Skype/Intel vs AMD" thing that they anticipated.

Period. :rofl:

Your argument is BS. I give up, obviously you can't be reasoned with. Again, this is no different from celolular service which prevents you from using your own mp3s on their cell phones, which is perfectly legal. this is no different.

Since I proved my point several times discussing with a very insightful wall, back on topic. :rofl:

Wasn't Intel gonna bring the Pentium M core to the desktop? Or something like merging the teams involved with the P-M to the desktop?

Your argument is BS. I give up, obviously you can't be reasoned with. Again, this is no different from celolular service which prevents you from using your own mp3s on their cell phones, which is perfectly legal. this is no different.

With the MP3 example what do you mean? That you cant transfer the song from the PC to the phone? Welll that would be a technical limitation.

I know absolutly no phones or carriers, at least where I live, that tell you that you can only user a single service to receive ringtones. Even if the phone is unable to take the file from a local PC, I still have the option to sign up with one of unlimited number of ringtone providers and have the tone transferred to me through them. In short, I dont believe any carrier in Australia tells you that you can only receive ringtones from their own or their affiliated services.

If you are in fact implying that by them not allowing you to transfer song from your PC is anticompetitive I would say your wrong. As long as they arent forcing you to use a particular phone service to download the files you still have a choice from 100's of places to get the ringtone. In short getting it from a PC may be a techniical limitation but you certainly arent told you can only get the file from one location.

As such I dont think this example is like AMD and Intel+Skype at all.

Bare with me if this is somehow different in the States, but here in Australia noone has a service forced apon them.

Wasn't Intel gonna bring the Pentium M core to the desktop? Or something like merging the teams involved with the P-M to the desktop?

The Dothan core does have several desktop variants, but motherboard are rare.

The Conroe concept takes bits from the mobile processors, the P-M, such as the low power consumption figures, shorter pipeline, and higher efficiency per clock cycle.

It sounds like P-M was Intel's way of dropping out a test balloon on their new idea.

What does anti-competitive deals between two private companies remotely have to do with whether or not you can upload your own mp3 files to your phone? I don't see the connection and it's all off-topic anyway so let's move on.

:laugh:

Most of us weren't around with the old Athlon series stuff, but AMD didn't always have the cooler chips. The old Athlons used to overheat and the auto-shutdown feature wasn't added till the later architectures (K6?).

The chipsets were made by third parties (which still do it, but are better at it) and used to be crazy instable.

On top of that, Intel's Pentium line just flatout beat the Athlons in everything. K7 was where AMD started become competitive.

What happened in the past five years was not what happened from 1969-1999/2000.

i don't have time to read through 17 pages of text but i'll throw in my two cents.

NOBODY HAS WON ANYTHING! it's one of those stupid wars. Remember with the graphics wars. First the ati 9800 was slightly ontop of the nv5900. then the 6800 doubled, and in some instances trippled the speed of the previous generation. Then ati came out with new card which matched it. It's a goddamn cycle. Everyonce in a while one of them will get a huge perforance jump but the othe will be soon be ahead..

as for me, i'm sticking with amd simply because the things i do require the 3dnow!+ extensions which intel doesn't use.

When the quad cores come around and its time for me to upgrade:

I will consider who has the best bang for the buck at the time. If its AMD then I'll go AMD. If its Intel I'll go Intel.

I just assembled a Pentium D 940 system this weekend and I honestly have to say that it whoops any other system I've built thus far.

My opinion is without the priviledge of making X2 systems or even socket 939 systems at that. Therefore its not a fair comparison at all.

My point is. They are both good companies and when they compete the only people that win are the consumers. We get choices.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!