22 year old law student fails FBI polygraph


Recommended Posts

Went from wired to anti-polygraph and saw a link from the http://antipolygraph.org/ site to http://antipolygraph.org/cgi-bin/forums/Ya...;num=1139616935 and found this:

Let me start out by saying that I am so relieved to have found this site. My dismal experience with the FBI polygraph was a mere 7 hours ago. I am so shocked and upset that I haven't had a bite to eat all day and feel physically and emotionally drained.

I am a law student at a top 100 law school. On a career services day, they said the FBI had an "honors" internship program. I was thrilled, and thought it sounded great. My first summer after law school would be the FBI! I submitted my application, and out of about 80 applicants, I was one of 15 to be called back for an interview. Eventually, I was selected as the candidate from the field office to attend the program. Again, I was very happy, and had complete faith and respect for the FBI.

Well, today I had my scheduled polygraph test. My friends had joked with me earlier saying, "Every answer is going to be a lie because you are so nervous." This is the truth, I get nervous very easily, but I had faith that I would get through the polygraph with no problem as I've never done anything. I don't smoke, don't drink, and have never even seen drugs.

Special Agent A, as I will call him, introduced himself to me in a kind of unfriendly way. I don't know how to pinpoint it, but I was even more nervous at that point. He led me to the polygraph room which had a two-way mirror, the polygraph chair, a regular chair, and his desk with the equipment. He told me what the polygraph was for - to make sure liars, cheaters, and theives are not admitted into the FBI. I shook my head in understanding - I, of course, was none of those things.

He hooked me up and I was feeling my heart beat accelerate. He then did a "practice exam" which consisted of me writing the number 4 on a piece of paper, he then wrote the numbers 1,2,3,5,6. He then told me to lie about me writing the number four. The equipment was started, and the blood pressure sleeve tightened around my arm - making me yet more uncomfortable. I answered all the questions and he told me that he could conclude I was lying about writing down the number 4. I smiled and said, "ok," as I thought that was pretty nifty that the machine was so sensitive.

I went through the first part of the exam ok (dealing with terrorist organizations), and I proceeded to the second phase - this is where things took a turn for the worse. He asked me several times, "Have you violated the FBI's guidelines regarding illegal substances?" I said No each time, as it is the complete God's honest truth. I am 22 and have never seen, smelled, or done drugs. I was raised Catholic, and it is very deeply ingrained in me never to do anything like that. Not only that, but severe asthma runs in my family, and I would never risk putting my health in jeopardy.

After the second phase, he told me he would be back, and left the room for a while. It had to have been 10 mins or so. He then came back in and unhooked me. He made me sit directly across from him, and he told me, "you failed the polygraph." According to the polygraph, I had used drugs. I was crushed, and immediately started to get emotional. I said, "I've never done anything, that is the truth." He then started saying, "you're lying, just admit it and then we can move on, you're only applying for an internship position, we make allowances for young college students, just admit it." I had tears in my eyes and said, "I'm not going to admit to doing something that I have not done." He said, "I can tell by the way you're acting that you're lying to me."

He asked me if I ever "smelled" marijuana. I said, no, never (which again is the truth - I have lived a kind of sheltered life, and none of my friends ever did anything either). He raised his eyebrows and made a face, "Now I know you're lying," he said with his voice rising, "no college student goes through life without smelling marijuana." I said that I didn't know what else to tell him, I never smelled, smoked, drank, or did anything.

I was a straight A student in high school and college, having graduated near the top of my class from a mid-atlantic university, and am now in law school on a scholarship. I am, if anything, deathly afraid of drugs as I know they are such a bad thing. One of my employers committed suicide a few years ago after an addiction to pain killers. I never knew what possessed people to even try drugs in the first place.

Anyway, he kept on pressing me for an explanation - one which I could not give. He said, "What about taking things to make you stay awake for studying?" Again, I was shocked. I never pull all-nighters in school, and I have never ever taken anything to keep me awake. I always try to have my work done ahead of time.

The interrogation lasted for a while, how long exactly I am not sure - probably an hour. I told him, "I'll take a drug test right now and prove that I don't do drugs." He replied, "No, you're not taking the drug test, the test is over. You're going to throw away your internship because you can't be honest." He then led me out of the building. I called my mother, hysterical crying about what had just happened.

I have very strong principles and values and have always prided myself in the fact that I uphold those values. I had never been accused like I was today, and he really made me feel as if I was a criminal. I am told my letter from HQ will come in 2-4 weeks. I will appeal, but I will never take this internship. I can't believe that the FBI relies on this machine. After working my whole life to avoid drugs, smoking, drinking, it was all for nothing. I know now that the FBI is certainly not for me, I will just get a regular summer internship at a law firm. But for anyone about to take the FBI polygraph, be careful, it has been one of the worst experiences of my life. I know the truth though, and so does my family, and I suppose in the end, that's all that matters.

suck it up who gives a ****

Which is why we have a corrupt system. How can our country ever get better if everyone is too busy to stand up for injustice.

When the Nazis arrested the Communists,

I said nothing; after all, I was not a Communist.

When they locked up the Social Democrats,

I said nothing; after all, I was not a Social Democrat.

When they arrested the trade unionists,

I said nothing; afterall, I was not a trade unionist.

When they arrested the Jews, I said nothing; after all, I was not a Jew.

When they arrested me, there was no longer anyone who could protest.

-Martin Niemoller (1892-1984)

That's bull****...

"no college student goes through life without smelling marijuana."

Then how come I've never smelled marijuana (at least that I know of).

I've also never smoked or done drugs. I did get drunk a few times, but not that often. So I don't find it that hard that there's people who have never done drugs or even been near drugs, since I know I haven't.

That's bull****...

Then how come I've never smelled marijuana (at least that I know of).

I've also never smoked or done drugs. I did get drunk a few times, but not that often. So I don't find it that hard that there's people who have never done drugs or even been near drugs, since I know I haven't.

Same here, never gone near the stuff.

lol @ your avatar :whistle:

well, i've taking the full-scope poly. I failed three times. I seriously doubt they told him he wont be offered the Job. I admited to smoking pot once, and was told that seemed like a lie. After three tests, I was proven correct. I think they have random people fail, to see if they continue to want the Job. He shouldn't give up.

ALso, the truth is, they may have had no reading on him, and everything was smoke and mirrors to get him to tell the truth. Which he may have.

I really believe that if he sticks with it, he'll get the Job. FBI, or any Job that requires a clearance is tough. If you can't handle the poly, then you can't work there.

Well he might have had a chance until he showed weakness. I mean, if it's true they allow people who have done drugs in the past do internships, he might have been able to good whether the gut believed him or not by the way he acted, but it's hard to hire someone who you just saw cry. Something I think that's not stressed enough when looking for a job is that while strength of character is important sometimes you need to have a little strength of personality and faith in yourself. If you're going to cry the second they say no, you're not going to go that far.

I can understand his emotional response. I mean, maybe the FBi was a life-long dream.

But, he's not getting the Job because he is giving up. I know that they would schedule him another poly. They wanted to rattle his chains, and he fell apart. Not because he cried, but because he feels it is the end of the line. 'The FBI's not for me".

The funny thing is, everyone gets hung up on the lifestyle polygraph. The counter-intel part is the part they really care about. No one cares if you smoked a little pot in the past, only that you wont do it again. (If you toked every day in college, well, you just may not get the Job. Of course, if you did that every day for 4 years, you may not be getting any Job) :rofl:

I've had friends tell me that the polygrapher threatened to have him arrested, etc. But, he made it.

Bottom line, if you are applying for a high-clearance position, dont give up until they send you a rejection letter. If they keep offering to have you retake the poly, go take it

Why do you Americans rely so much on a test that is so damn inaccurate that no other country in the world uses it?

I have read that it's apparently very very easy for someone who knows what they're doing to fool a polygraph.

Apparently the CIA's worst ever spy passed a polygraph and got into the organisation. For years he was able to send out secrets without raising suspicion because he passed his initial polygraph test, and that was justification that this person could be trusted. They apparently knew that there was information being leaked but didn't bother to quiz anyone who had already passed the polygraph test. Eventually they caught him.

It blows my mind that a world super power still relies on such a stupid test for screening people that it is recruiting into it's high level organisations, they may as well just ask "Are you a bad guy?" when interviewing someone.

He shoud have know better before going in for the test. The polygraph is not about defeating the machine - and it isn't all that accurate most of the time, esp for people who get nervous. Its about defeating the interviewer.

There's probably less than 5% that can completely pass with lying. They either have severe mental problems or they're George Kostanza (from Seinfeld). They're the type that have lied so much they don't know the truth either.

Answer yes, no. But when they challenge don't be dodgy. Say, I know you feel that this is what I have done because the machine tells you this. But, all the data you purport as saying all college students have smoked pot is untrue. I know that all my close friends have not smoked pot and nor have I. You can verify that. They aren't about to bust your friends either.

Seems he doesn't have the personality to work there. And neither as a lawyer (or at least not a crooked one!!). Hey, looks like a good one to hire.

what a whining pathetic applicant, im glad he didnt make the fbi.

"I called my mother, hysterical crying about what had just happened."

He needs to grow some balls then he can be in an american anti crime organization.

Special Agent A made a good call.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A gatekeeper is basically a company that is used by so many other (businesses) that sudden changes could impact the other business might fail. Like for example, say a car show room uses AWS to it's database, as gatekeepers amazon wouldn't really be expected to just change it's terms of conditions that would rug pull the database from the car show's business leaving them in the dark.
    • As someone who isn't in the EU what is all this gatekeeper stuff about anyways?
    • The data center gold rush has tossed all forms of sensibility and reasoning right out of the window. The craziest part being that AI infrastructure isn't driven by consumer demand. It's being driven by manufacturers to force AI onto the market, consumers be damned.
    • Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary ..... LOL.... These are the new prices peeps, because they will still sell them. Everybody will get used to the price hike = more Profit!
    • EU says AWS and Microsoft Azure should be treated as DMA gatekeepers by Pradeep Viswanathan Under the European Commission's Digital Markets Act (DMA), a company is presumed to be a gatekeeper if it meets certain quantitative thresholds. However, the Commission can still investigate and designate a company even if it does not meet the numeric thresholds, provided the service has a major market impact. The European Commission launched its investigations into AWS and Azure on November 18, 2025, to address unfair or anti-competitive practices in the cloud sector. Today, the European Commission has informed Amazon and Microsoft of its preliminary view that their cloud computing services, AWS and Azure, should be designated as gatekeepers under the DMA. The EC highlighted that Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure are the largest and second-largest cloud computing services in the European Union. Both of these platforms act as important gateways between businesses and their customers in the EU. The EC further mentioned that AWS and Azure have reached significant turnover, built large and entrenched user bases, and benefit from high switching costs and customer lock-in. Furthermore, their operational capacity and investments appear to have outpaced those of competitors. Teresa Ribera, Executive Vice-President for Clean, Just and Competitive Transition, said the following: It is important to note that the findings are preliminary and do not decide the final outcome. Amazon and Microsoft can now review the findings and respond to the Commission. However, if the Commission confirms its preliminary findings, it will formally designate Amazon and Microsoft as gatekeepers for AWS and Azure. Once designated, Microsoft and Amazon will have six months to bring their cloud services into full compliance with the DMA’s rules and regulations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      424
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Xenon
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!