The New Office 2007 File Formats


Recommended Posts

This is stupid - why do Microsoft always feel to need to specifically label everything? Seven different formats of a PowerPoint presentation is ridiculous - what's wrong with having one universal PowerPoint format that is like all of the seven new format's wrapped together, and (just for a change of pace), call it .ppt?

Sshhh! That's going to be the breakthrough addition to Office 2009...

Seriously, how many people really need to know whether or not a word document is 'macro-enabled' before they even open it?

Templates, I get. I can understand differentiating templates from documents. But differentiating documents with slightly different features? I just don't see it. Oh well, I guess that's why I never made it past the first Microsoft interview.

What could suck about this is that you send a .dox resume to an employer and they can't open it, thus not hiring you. I will wait to see if MS confirms this on their site somewhere.

You use .doc, etc formats? I use PDF formats for everything... Which Office 2007 will have the PDF output build in.. YAY, I can't wait... :D

Yeah right, that's why all these third parties are getting aneurisms when they're trying to write their own Office format converters...

Are you suggesting that it's Microsoft's responsibility to ensure that their own proprietary file formats are completely reverse-engineerable to other companies and their software?

Are you suggesting that it's Microsoft's responsibility to ensure that their own proprietary file formats are completely reverse-engineerable to other companies and their software?

No, I'm saying that Microsoft is introducing the XML formats to ease third parties extending Office.

Got something in your eye?

Lol

No really, you act like you're a mod or something :whistle:.

When did he? I never saw that. Take me as an example though... I always try acting like a mod! Mini mod me! :laugh:

I can see this change from MS causing a lot of problems with business to business document emails. The more non tech savy users will use office 2007 and save them in the default file type and send the relevent document to someone in another company who is still using office 2000.

I know it has the backward compatibility, but i just see it causing confusion and annoyance to the adverage below tech savy person.

When i read people on here saying 7 power point file extensions, i was shocked. Then i went and actually looked at the list and realized that, once again, people on here are over-reacting.

There are really 3 power point file types, same as now - standard file, template, slideshow. Most people never used the latter two, and probably will continue to never use them. But they are there for a reason.

The macro-enabled formats are to ease security on systems. How annoying is it when email programs warn you that a simple old Word document could potentially harm your computer if you open what your friend sent you. With the separate extension, the filters would only need to apply to the macro-enabled files. Its a simple way for external programs (all you Microsoft-bashers read carefully: non-Microsoft programs) to tell if the document is "safe." In the end, it'll make transmitting documents to other consumers a much more friendly process.

When they're adding so many formats, why not .odf to meet some common ground with other office suites??

Break out your bubble, Microsoft.

I am all for standards but here is a scenario...imagine MS using ODF as standard, now if Microsoft wants to add a feature, they can't unless whatever committee handling ODF approves it...and you know how fast they work :whistle: so if MS puts the "propreitory extension" and people blame them for destroying the standard!

so its better to have your own thing which you can augment, improve or do whatever.

When apple adds a new extension to HTML (canvas... I might be wrong on this), people applaud it and adapt it...but when MS does similar, they take out their swords and start choppin ! :laugh:

so screw ODF :rofl:

I am all for standards but here is a scenario...imagine MS using ODF as standard, now if Microsoft wants to add a feature, they can't unless whatever committee handling ODF approves it...and you know how fast they work :whistle: so if MS puts the "propreitory extension" and people blame them for destroying the standard!

so its better to have your own thing which you can augment, improve or do whatever.

When apple adds a new extension to HTML (canvas... I might be wrong on this), people applaud it and adapt it...but when MS does similar, they take out their swords and start choppin ! :laugh:

so screw ODF :rofl:

:rolleyes:

Many people complained about the canvas extension as well.

They should've just used SVG.

There's nothing wrong with standards. It's not like there's that much left to add to word processors, or is there?

When they're adding so many formats, why not .odf to meet some common ground with other office suites??

Break out your bubble, Microsoft.

It's not so many formats, it's just many extensions.

Word has a single format but multiple extensions, like document with and without macros, template with or without macros (template is a full blown document). It decides handling based on the extension. Is the fourth character an X, it'll plain out ignore any macros, is it an M, it won't but warn.

In Powerpoint, apart from the add-in format, they're yet again all the same format different extensions, telling the application how to proceed after opening the file.

Excel ditto, except they're also supporting a new binary format for large datasets, since the sheet's now 16000 columns and 2 million rows.

I like the way everyone flies off the handle without actually finding out about a subject.

This was originally announced last summer and the intention is to make it 3rd party developers lives so much easier with the new, open XML file format. The XML is zipped in order (the XML is first) with the file assets so that even if your file becomes corrupt you can still recover the xml and thus save yourself a massive headache!! Just because you don't have problems with something doesn?t mean it's perfect!!

Oh and on the note of backwards compatibility the original (and I think still) plan was to release updates for Office 2003/Office XP to add the file format. So... I?m not sure why everyone is having a hissy fi;) ;)

http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=73329 (this is the original interview from last year)

http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=159231 (Not watch this one yet, only just found it)

http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=174061 (or this one!)

http://openxmldeveloper.org/

I like the way everyone flies off the handle without actually finding out about a subject.

This was originally announced last summer and the intention is to make it 3rd party developers lives so much easier with the new, open XML file format. The XML is zipped in order (the XML is first) with the file assets so that even if your file becomes corrupt you can still recover the xml and thus save yourself a massive headache!! Just because you don't have problems with something doesn?t mean it's perfect!!

Oh and on the note of backwards compatibility the original (and I think still) plan was to release updates for Office 2003/Office XP to add the file format. So... I?m not sure why everyone is having a hissy fi;) ;)

http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=73329 (this is the original interview from last year)

http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=159231 (Not watch this one yet, only just found it)

http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=174061 (or this one!)

http://openxmldeveloper.org/

well said. People should have a read into the subject before commenting about it. The new file format is made such that it uses XML, and people who don't have word can still read the file. Word documents can now be created in real-time (from client request) by servers to contain whatever information asked. It makes the extension much more useful, and it's a great way to promote more use of office.

yeah but I doubt the opisite will be possible :/

its possible, i can open office 07 files in 03 and save them too

Most professors require the .doc format, so they're screwing a lot of college kids.

MS will release free upgrade for Office 2003, to open new file formats.

and Office 2007 can save doc files too.

so how are they screwing college kids?

its possible, i can open office 07 files in 03 and save them too

MS will release free upgrade for Office 2003, to open new file formats.

and Office 2007 can save doc files too.

so how are they screwing college kids?

They're screwing them for forcing those people to use an expensive office suite.

I originally thought this was going to be a mess, but since the common formats are backward-compatible, this shouldn't be too bad. Hopefully the current beta uses the final format.

They're screwing them for forcing those people to use an expensive office suite.

Yes... because there aren't any cheap or free alternatives that support the DOC format... :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!