Recommended Posts

honestly it's called goaltending. And as overated as Dida is, bloody he's better then Robinson and James so i think that is the only reason they cant. Honestly, if england could get a good keeper, the world cup would be rolling in. They have an incredible team.

with all my respect to england we have in one hand

ronaldinho, ronaldo, adriano, kaka, robinho, roberto carlos, edmilson.............

on the other we have .... lampard?!?

i guess the answer it's clear

Brazil without a doubt have an amazing team. Even though I want England to win I will enjoy every bit of football Brazil play as it is absoloutely breathtaking sometimes.

I dont think Lampard is that important to England, I think Gerrard is the man to lead England to glory :).

Of course England can beat Brazil (probably not as probable as the the other way around but still...)

Big name stars don't mean anything...just look at the US "Dream Team" in basketball the past two times. They filled it full of stars who always wanted the ball and always wanted to take the shot, and none of them were good teammates because they were used to being "the man"

A very good point. Just look at Real Madrid and all the top names they have bought within the last five years or so, Zidane, Beckham, Figo, Ronaldo, Raul, Baptista, Cicinho, Ramos, Robinho, Carlos, Cassilas, Owen....are all big names and failed to lead Real to glory.

hah, I just can't stand watching them, they make me nervous and never look as if they are that bothered or are taking it seriously (mainly Ferdinand).

I know they both have times where they are second to none, but that doesnt compensate for all the mistakes and crazy antics they get up to and you can't afford to mess around like that when Ronaldinho is breathing down your neck.

I agree with that. How Sven can justify playing Ferdinand over Carragher is beyond me. Ferdinand had a fantastic World Cup at Japan but since his big money move to Man Utd he has not shown the kind of top class defending at even passion for the game that Jamie Carragher has. He is only in it for the money now, holding Man Utd to random for ?100,000 a week is just greedy.

What England needs to do is believe in themselves. Team has players who are part of Chelsea, Manchester United, Arsenal, Liverpool and these all clubs are successful clubs. Look at individual players and their recent form. Joe Cole & Frank Lampard have been great at Chelsea this season. Gary Neville is a proved player, Ashley Cole & John Terry will be tough to beat in defense. David Beckham & Steven Gerrard will be in the midfield, and they both are among the best. Michael Owen & Peter Crouch on the attack and England looks a competitive team. Brazil might be better, but on the pitch its not the better team on paper who wins, the one who does better on pitch wins the game. It will be a close contest and hope England does it this time.

In the last world cup they lost the quarter-finals to Brazil 2-1. They will meet in semi final this world cup hope England does the other way around and beat Brazil 2-1.

The question should be ?Can England defeat any of the TOP teams??

Because honestly I can?t see England getting past teams like Italy, France or Argentina, yes they have some quality players but the above teams are on the same level with Brazil which in my book is miles ahead of England.

But who knows ,maybe with another coach they can do it.

Yes, with good team work anyone can beat Brazil, we (mexico) defeated them with full team in the confederations too bad we lost against argentina

Hmmm... It's quite known that teams have a very different performance when thy are in the World Cup... in the case of Brazil they simply play extraordinarily.

C?sar:))

You know England and Argentina played a few months ago in a 'friendly', England won 3-2 after being 2-0 down i think, in one of the best football matches i've ever seen.

*edit* To eavere.

Excatly my point. Brazil deserves a credit for the quality of their play, but I just CAN'T STAND how a lot of teams, including Brazil look like rotten pansies diving here and there every minute. At least players like Rooney, Wright-Phillips play like men, they take the ball and if they go forward, they go forward without falling down whenever an opponent is nearby whilst looking at the referee straight away. This is the biggest thing that ****es me off about football, and I think England's play is better than most of the teams with regards to that type of behaviour.

P.S. HUM, eat ****e. Have respect to other members and other teams you little pansy. Or I can say something like: "Brazil - we dive our way to the victory!".

The England problem is the superiority complex: they invented the soccer and thinks they need win to prove for the world that England players are great.

But let's see.. in last 12 years in 3 World Cups we saw great bulgarians, romanians, belgians, russians, sweedens, croatians, dutchs and turkey players. But where are the great England players with great performances in last World Cups? I only saw Lineker in 86/90 and nothing more.

Owen, Beckham, Lampard, Gerrard that guys everyone calls "great" are only regular players: they don't have decide-power in high-level international cups. They are insecure, charged by the UK press to do something during World Cup but we see only regular acting.

I recognize the great work in the Premier League in last 10 years in the organization. England shows the world how organize a great championship and gain money with soccer. But the player levels are still bad since Cantona left PL. Why? Has something wrong with England players, their formation and trainning? I don't know.. I only see a national team with ethernal _promise_ to suprise and prove they are great.

Meanwhile, bulgarians, romanians, belgians, russians, sweedens, croatians, dutchs and turkeys are still proving and showing great football. Because they doesn't have superiority complex and doesn't need prove nothing.

God, how I want see a great England players but Lineaker is already retired and after him none appeared. We saw only promisses in last years.

The England problem is the superiority complex: they invented the soccer and thinks they need win to prove for the world that England players are great.

But let's see.. in last 12 years in 3 World Cups we saw great bulgarians, romanians, belgians, russians, sweedens, croatians, dutchs and turkey players. But where are the great England players with great performances in last World Cups? I only saw Lineker in 86/90 and nothing more.

Owen, Beckham, Lampard, Gerrard that guys everyone calls "great" are only regular players: they don't have decide-power in high-level international cups. They are insecure, charged by the UK press to do something during World Cup but we see only regular acting.

I recognize the great work in the Premier League in last 10 years in the organization. England shows the world how organize a great championship and gain money with soccer. But the player levels are still bad since Cantona left PL. Why? Has something wrong with England players, their formation and trainning? I don't know.. I only see a national team with ethernal _promise_ to suprise and prove they are great.

Meanwhile, bulgarians, romanians, belgians, russians, sweedens, croatians, dutchs and turkeys are still proving and showing great football. Because they doesn't have superiority complex and doesn't need prove nothing.

God, how I want see a great England players but Lineaker is already retired and after him none appeared. We saw only promisses in last years.

What are you talking about? :| Half the teams you mention have not qualified for this WC. Cantona is French !! :blink: Lampard Gerrard Beckham & Owen have had their share of international success with their teams, English or international. I don't really believe in this England team (esp. without Rooney) because they don't have the right coach for the job. But I couldn't disagree more with your entire post.

To some it no probably not, hell last time roudn they couldn't even do it when Brazil where down to 10 men........

However one thing sven is doing now is taking risks (he has nothing to lose really, which might just do something for us). Our team over the last few years has lacked any sort of killer instinct but I guess thats england all over!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!