Wii Graphics clearup


Recommended Posts

The problem with HD is you Americans absolutley SWEAR HD is the norm in the rest of the world, or will be in coming years. I live in the Dominican Republic, a third world country with a lot of poverty. I am probably in the upper 1% of the social spectrum though, and so are all of my friends. But out of all the people I know..only 4 or so have HDTVs (myself included). That's not so many, you know? And whenever I go traveling, I notice most HDTVs are in the stores hehe and not in people's homes. Just because the US is so close to being 100% HD doesn't mean the rest of the world is catching on..Nintendo is appealing to a wider fanbase.

Quoted for veracity.

I feel like a broken record player here. According to a lot of Neowinians, you'd think the entire world will soon consist of 17 year olds with 42" HDTVs that need to play "hardcore" games and wouldn't be caught dead with a game that might make them seem anything less than "mature".

HDTV adoption is not going to go nearly as quickly as some people seem to think it will. Sure, all TV signals will be digital by 2009, and the amount of HD programming is sure to climb. But that doesn't mean that in 2009 everyone will have an HD set or even a digital TV. You're going to see a lot of people keeping their SD sets and getting converter boxes to convert the digital signals to analog.

Let's look at the introduction of color TV. In 1950, the first color TV hit the market. In 1967, most broadcasts were in color. In 1972, half of all US televisions were color sets. Half. It took 22 years for 50% of households to adopt color television sets. That's 5 years after most broadcasts were in color. Even though new technologies are coming out faster than they did in the 60's, I don't think people are adopting them at a faster rate. Even allowing for some increase in the adoption rate, we're looking at around 2010 before even half of Americans have an HDTV. And that's pushing it, because B&W to color was a huge change. SD to HD is arguably a less major transition. Videophiles will of course say it's massive, but regular joes may not even know what HD is yet. And look at broadband internet access. If I asked all the "HDTV will be the norm in 2-3 years" people what percentage of Americans (not even getting into the rest of the world) had broadband internet, I'd put good money on the bet that nearly all of their guesses would be high. There's still a good portion of the country that doesn't even have access to cable or DSL and still must use dial-up.

Anyway, back on topic. If Nintendo created the Wii as an HD console, the price would probably be around $400. At $400, a few things happen. First, they enter direct competition with Microsoft. When someone goes to buy a new console, they now have the option of getting a Wii or a 360. They're the same price. That will result in a loss of customers. Also, you'll have people that wouldn't pay $400 for any console. Another loss of customers.

At a possible price point of $199 (source), Nintendo now taps into an entirely new market. The Wii becomes almost an impulse buy. And now, they're no longer in competition with Microsoft. If someone has $200 to spend on a console, the 360 no longer enters into the equation at twice the price.

And finally, and I've said this a number of times now, people will not shy away from the Wii due to graphics alone. If someone wants to play any Nintendo exclusive, they'll be just as happy playing it at 480p as they would at 720p. And at $200, many may pick up the console if only for a single game (like Twilight Princess or SSBB). If someone isn't interested in Nintendo exclusives and wants HD, they'd get a 360 or a PS3. But even if the Wii had HD, they'd probably get a 360 or a PS3 anyway for other reasons (HDD support, more extensive online play, etc). For the Wii to compete on that level, they'd have to add even more hardware and pump up the price even more.

Edited by Jack31081

Personally, the lack of HD support is fine with me. My consoles go in my room and I have a 24" CRT in there that I use to play games on. I don't plan on getting an HD TV in the next 5 years unless I am forced to.

Think about it though - most consoles are used in kid's rooms where there is an average or hand me down TV. Most of the market does not have HD TVs and don't plan on getting on unless they need to.

Also, the point about the Dominican Republic is moot... I reasonably doubt that Nintendo is thinking "hey, let's make our console for a 3rd world country that is covered in poverty. Yeah those people will definitely get a Wii instead of dinner for the next 6-8 weeks."

Nope, the US is really the only place where HD is making any real headway.

As for broadband, the UK was basically the only other industrialized nation that could compete with the US on the pure crappyness of broadband service. But I think the UK is improving faster now.

I'm a student that works part time in the Audio + TV dept at John Lewis, and last week we were informed that in the UK 1 HDTV is being sold every 15 seconds. Which does'nt surprise me considering how many we sell.

The HD Set top boxes are another matter entirely, the box costs ?299-?399 + ?10, so demand is'nt very high for the boxes yet.

I'm a student that works part time in the Audio + TV dept at John Lewis, and last week we were informed that in the UK 1 HDTV is being sold every 15 seconds. Which does'nt surprise me considering how many we sell.

The HD Set top boxes are another matter entirely, the box costs ?299-?399 + ?10, so demand is'nt very high for the boxes yet.

And at that rate, it will take 28 years before every person in England has a HDTV set, that's still 14 years until half the population has a HDTV (maths are based on 1 set every 15 seconds, or 5,760 sets a day, population at 60,441,457 according to the CIA)

while HDTV is cool, it still costs a bundle over here, and a lot of SDTV (e.g. the max res of the screen is 480p) sets are marked as "HD Compatible".

And all of our sets are 4:3 SDTV, next one will most likely be another SDTV, but 16:9, or spend a bit (e.g. a couple of grand) and get a 720p one.

Edited by The_Decryptor

I work at a major electronics store in the U.S. And to be honest I wish that HD was catching on faster than it is. I don't see people replacing working SDTV's with HDTV's just because of a change in resolution and aspect ratio. Rather, people buying HDTV's are buying them because their old tv stopped working or because this is their first tv (Younger crowd). I would say that for every HDTV I sell, I still sell 2 SDTV's. The price is the biggest inhibitor. To step into an HDTV is going to run you in most cases no less than $1000, but on average probably more like $2000 for a nice tv. This is because most hdtv's are newer technology (plasma, lcd, lcd projection, DLP, LCoS). Most people just are not interested in spending that much money on a tv, just for the sake of having the latest greatest, when they have a perfectly working tv at home. Yeah 2009 all broadcasts are supposed to be digital and hd, but I'd be surprised if half of the tv's in america are actually hd capable.

If Nintendo's Wii has games that support the widescreen format (even some GCN games do this) then it won't matter what the resolution is. Have you ever played a PS2 on a HD 46" tv? I have and it looked like crap, but my roomate (whose tv and ps2 it was) didn't care one bit. PS2 has been looking like crap for a long time, and yet it is still the most predominate console at least here in the states. Games, in the end, are what sell consoles, not tv's.

And at that rate, it will take 28 years before every person in England has a HDTV set, that's still 14 years until half the population has a HDTV (maths are based on 1 set every 15 seconds, or 5,760 sets a day, population at 60,441,457 according to the CIA)

while HDTV is cool, it still costs a bundle over here, and a lot of SDTV (e.g. the max res of the screen is 480p)sets are marked as "HD Compatible".

And all of our sets are 4:3 SDTV, next one will most likely be another SDTV, but 16:9, or spend a bit (e.g. a couple of grand) and get a 720p one.

I DO think that there will be 1 or 2 TVs per home, not 1 per person, maybe you should redo the calculations...

I live in Spain, and nor any of my friends nor me have got a HDTV, still i don't know at what rate they are being sold here, but I suspect it's not very high.

I don't really care that much about "crisp n' clear" graphics as long as the game is fun to play, I guess I'm used to play old games, anyway :p

I'm a student that works part time in the Audio + TV dept at John Lewis, and last week we were informed that in the UK 1 HDTV is being sold every 15 seconds. Which does'nt surprise me considering how many we sell.

The HD Set top boxes are another matter entirely, the box costs ?299-?399 + ?10, so demand is'nt very high for the boxes yet.

It's very similar in Germany (Fifa worldcup gets aired in HDTV and free to air, the best possible marketing). But I still consider Nintendo's choice absolutely correct. Most guys watch DVDs on their HDTV sets and are very happy with the image quality, it's all they need, and Wii has the same resolution at a higher framerate. Image quality is better than DVD or DVB, and I think that's really enough for this generation.:) :)

I DO think that there will be 1 or 2 TVs per home, not 1 per person, maybe you should redo the calculations...

...

Well, if you cant tell me how many sets per house people will buy, i'll try it. ;)

I know my calculation was very general, but it shows that the transition to all HDTV wont happen over night, or even for the next few years.

BTW, I don't think I have read yet if the Wii will offer Progressive Scan (480p)?

And at that rate, it will take 28 years before every person in England has a HDTV set, that's still 14 years until half the population has a HDTV (maths are based on 1 set every 15 seconds, or 5,760 sets a day, population at 60,441,457 according to the CIA)

Also, there's a flaw in the post above. Technology never advances in a linear fashion, it always increases logrithmacly. THat is, as time advances, the number of people buying new tech will increase with greater and greater number....

Umm just because Xbox360 and PS3 are focusing on HD dosen't mean it won't play on a SD TV it dosen't mean Wii is trying to be more world supportive. I mean yeah but not having HD it makes the console cheaper and more affordable for people to buy and that probaly has a big out come on the worldwide sales. But its a feature on X360 and PS3 that makes games look a lot better then last gen and they want people that have HDTVs it to be able to use it for all games. Yes lots of people dont have HDTVs yet but thats the way the market is going and few years down the road HDTVs will be able to be bought fairly cheap so it will become more afordable for people.

I think the Wii is very inovated and should be a lot of fun but it's graphics arn't going to compare to the other systems.

I think all three game systems are going to do well I don't go out and bash and try and put other systems down. I will be buying a PS3 at release because personaly its what I want the most. You know why I want PS3? More games that I like and have been playing the past few years are going to be on the PS3. Probaly mostly Final Fantasyt (huge FF fan). I probaly will eventually buy a Wii to because it is definitly creative and will be lots of fun.

I'm looking forward to see what all X360, PS3, and Wii have to offer.

Im not big on console games anymore, but I wont buy an xbox360 nor will I buy a ps3. But the Wii, however, I will buy. Im a hardcore nintendo fan from the 8bit days, and can still remember the first time i played Super Mario Brothers and Duck Hunt. If what I read somewhere about all the previous nintendo games being able to be downloaded and played on the Wii were correct, then im sold. I LOVE playing Excite bike and rc pro am on my pc, and will love it even more back on a console and a tv. Thats the selling point that got me.

BTW, I don't think I have read yet if the Wii will offer Progressive Scan (480p)?

Also, there's a flaw in the post above. Technology never advances in a linear fashion, it always increases logrithmacly. THat is, as time advances, the number of people buying new tech will increase with greater and greater number....

As I mentioned in my post, just because technology itself advances at a faster rate doesn't necessarily mean that people adopt it at a faster rate.

when this nation went from radio to b&w tv to color tv, everyone had a radio, and then everyone had a b&w tv, and then everyone had a color tv. the gap between the technologies was large enough where people were able to buy the next technology when it came time to buy something new.

the same no longer applies. Just because technologies are coming out at a faster rate doesn't mean people are going through their current products at a faster rate. In fact, it means that people are skipping 'generations' of technology.

If the average TV lasts for 8 years, and new TV technologies are coming out ever 2, it means that the average consumer will jump from tech 1 to tech 4. it doesn't mean that they will suddenly be buying a new tv every 2 years.

does that make sense?

How many people play games on their PC at 640 x 480 or 800 x 600 anymore?

i use 800 x 600 but only because i use it for online games to see far(every thing is close up) but yea the higher the better. i dont know if the wii is better then the xbox, not xbox360.

and yet it is still the most predominate console at least here in the states. Games, in the end, are what sell consoles, not tv's

thats not true all the way, the PS2 was said to be very very powerful, able to controll a missle :whistle:

A former MSGS guy working @ Nintendo told me they're no using HD as a marketing pitch for the Wii becuase they are all about the controller but that the ATI GPU on the Wii is on par or a bit above with the power of nVidia GPU on the original Xbox. So, this means the Wii will be capable of doing 480i/p and 720p on 4:3 and 16:9 aspect ratio but it will be up to the game developer to use any of those features because they will not force them to go the SD way. Nintendo will also support progresive scan in every first party game just as they do right now with the GameCube and they will also sell a set of component/optical audio cables for those who want to take the Wii to the next level.

So, no need to worry about the graphics on the Wii cuz Nintendo will reveal more stuff about this topic near the system launch. :happy: :yes:

If the Wii maximum resolution is 640x480 you can count me out! That is a pretty sad resolution that was more or less max out on last generation consoles.

It will be a lot cheaper then XBox 360 and PS3. The games will be fun, but it will look really "fuzzy" on my screen compared to the games I play on my xbox 360.

If the Wii maximum resolution is 640x480 you can count me out! That is a pretty sad resolution that was more or less max out on last generation consoles.

It will be a lot cheaper then XBox 360 and PS3. The games will be fun, but it will look really "fuzzy" on my screen compared to the games I play on my xbox 360.

Did the Gamecube look "fuzzy"?

If the Wii maximum resolution is 640x480 you can count me out! That is a pretty sad resolution that was more or less max out on last generation consoles.

It will be a lot cheaper then XBox 360 and PS3. The games will be fun, but it will look really "fuzzy" on my screen compared to the games I play on my xbox 360.

720x480, probably. Anyway, do you watch movies on your HDTV? If so, do you use DVDs? Do they look "really fuzzy" on your screen? Wii games will look pretty much the same...

People are trying to say that the Wii isn't next gen but is next gen really defined by it's graphics? Apparently, a whole lot of people think that the next generation is supposed to be better than the next but take humans for example. Every generation until now has been having longer life expectancies. Next gen is just the next batch, whether they are better or not.

People are trying to say that the Wii isn't next gen but is next gen really defined by it's graphics? Apparently, a whole lot of people think that the next generation is supposed to be better than the next but take humans for example. Every generation until now has been having longer life expectancies. Next gen is just the next batch, whether they are better or not.

Well Said!!

Im getting the impression the wii is basically just a gamecube with a controller. I dont see why they just didnt release a controller for the gamecube and then there is your wii. Maybe i'll wait and see but at $250 I dont think I will be buying it.

Because there cant be an attachment for Wii Connect 24, virtual console, opera, nintendo wifi, and who knows what else. If you only consider graphics, then yes, the Wii is a mere upgrade of gamecube with a new controller. But where does that leave xbox360, and ps3? You can apply this logic with any console if you ask me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!