Neowin's Official World Cup 2006 Thread



Recommended Posts

Isnt it time to unstick this, the NBA thread was done right after game 6.

No way pedro :p

This is a discussion thread, it's not like a second after the final was over we would be banned from discussing it and then just wait until 2010 to air our views ;).

(Y)

Finally someone around here who knows what he's talking about and doesn't just follow what the stupid press says.

I wish I knew more english to discuss this, but everyone who knows just a little about football already knows that if someone separates his elbow from his body trying to interrupt the other player is foul.

He made a song and dance of it.

Maybe stupid question, but is there an official language that all referees must know? How do the referees know what the players are complaining about if both teams and the ref all have different native languages?

Official language is English ;)

Strange, two different version, Zidane say on TV that Materazzi insult mother & sister, but Materazzi deny.....

but Materazzy don't say exactly which insult he has say..... :rolleyes:

Thanks for all Zidane, you will be always a genius ! I am proud to be Frenchie as him. Great World Cup

I think, It is a plot organized to exclude to provoke Zidane.

Penalties are 100% luck.....I always think France merit victory.

Penalties are 100% luck.....I always think France merit victory.

I agree with that. France played better than Italy in my opinion, but the fact is they still never won. Penalties are purely the look of the draw and I am not the biggest fan of them.

Does anyone else think that the match should just be played until someone scores, but perhaps there should be unlimited substitutions :/?

Penalties are 100% luck.....I always think France merit victory.

But you lose.

And you draw in the regular time with a fake penalty (as already shown) therefore France has also been too much lucky. France couldn't also make a true goal... instead Italy made a goal with Materazzi (Barthez is just ridiculous) and also took a crossbar.

However... don't worry... maybe in 2010...... ;)

But you lose.

And you draw in the regular time with a fake penalty (as already shown) therefore France has also been too much lucky. France couldn't also make a true goal... instead Italy made a goal with Materazzi (Barthez is just ridiculous) and also took a crossbar.

However... don't worry... maybe in 2010...... ;)

haha (Y) its true

No ;)

Can you imagine if the game lasted for 400 minutes? :huh:

Someone would score eventually. Extra time these day's is often played at a much slower tempo because teams are playing for penalties, if they know they must score then it will make for a more entertaining game. The unlimited substitutions would make it feasable as well.

Just an idea anyway, better than penalties in my eyes.

I agree with that. France played better than Italy in my opinion, but the fact is they still never won. Penalties are purely the look of the draw and I am not the biggest fan of them.

Does anyone else think that the match should just be played until someone scores, but perhaps there should be unlimited substitutions :/?

Only two penalties for France on the World Cup. Remember fake penalty vs Australia lol

If you had penalty vs Australia, it's normal france have penalty in final, injury is more visible. There were penalty because Materazzi arrived with violent intention.

Penalty = 100% luck. It's not me to say it, all the pro say it.

I'm sure Italy was very lucky. Provovokation of Zidane.........it's very Italian.

Italy don't play after half time, very poor.....no real action.

For France :

- Zidane (1)

- Ribery (1)

- Henry (2)

- Malouda (1)

For Italy :

Only 2 corners in all the match.

I have recorded the match, and I have looked the match 3 times, I'm sure.

Someone would score eventually. Extra time these day's is often played at a much slower tempo because teams are playing for penalties, if they know they must score then it will make for a more entertaining game. The unlimited substitutions would make it feasable as well.

Just an idea anyway, better than penalties in my eyes.

Maybe if they also keep lowering the number of players as well ... 10 vs. 10, 9 vs. 9, all the way to keeper vs. keeper :| .

France legend Zinedine Zidane has been handed a three match-ban for his World Cup final headbutt on Marco Materazzi, whilst the Italian stopper has received a two-match ban for his part in the unsavoury incident.

Source: SkySports

How can a retired player serve a three match ban :p?

All good things come to an end ;).

Not true, think of it in a positive way, the World Cup is only on stand-by for another 4 years, with inbetween fun (euro, copa america and domestic games), therefore its not at 'an end' :rofl:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with adblockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Opera Air'. It still has some bloat, but nowhere near as much as Brave browser, for example. I have a system wide Adblocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the the web browser, but over the whole thing. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt adblocker because of that.
    • I have been using Firefox for years.
    • I'd trust open source stuff on github more then closed source binaries from Microsoft.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!