England vs Trinidad were lucky by their hair.

By .Kompressor
in The Sporting Arena

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

theyarecomingforyou

Posted
Posted

I couldn't see anything at first but I assume this is about Crouch pulling the T&T guy's hair? It was only very slight and didn't look malicious, particularly not when you consider this is Crouch, one of the most friendly guys on the team. Most importantly it didn't have any bearing on the goal itself and was nothing in comparison to the typical mal-handling that occurs during ever corner. This is just an excuse to bash England and is completely unwarranted. England gave a very good performance after the miserable first half and definitely deserved to win - it was much improved from their distinctly unimpressive performance against Paraguay.

The England haters in this thread are a bit disappointing to see but not exactly unexpected.

Grand Master

leesmithg

Posted
Posted

from what I just seen in the comments to the video was racist.

I am not allowed to call you stupid as this is seen as a violation of neowins rules, I wish I could as what you wrote has zero to do with racism.

Go look in the dictionary what it means.

Grand Master

PaulCabby

Posted
Posted

May I ask what that has to do with this play? :huh:

Its just that the original poster is making what Peter Crouch did is such a big deal. If this is a big deal, then players manhandling players whilst taking a corner is a big deal as well. A eye for a eye ;) Bad logic i know but a bit tired atm :whistle:

*backs away from thread*

Apprentice

Hexter66

Posted
Posted

I am not allowed to call you stupid as this is seen as a violation of neowins rules, I wish I could as what you wrote has zero to do with racism.

Go look in the dictionary what it means.

dude, I wasn't on about the content of the video. :p

comments5ya.png

for now I'm backing away from the thread. I have read the rules.

Grand Master

Martyn

Posted
Posted

Good old Peter Crouch. In the nine caps he has recieved he has scored six goals, and dont forget that he has only started about five of those games. He has scored more goals for England, in his past few appearences than Michael Owen has scored in...a year or so.

Crouch deserves to start up front with Rooney, rather than Owen starting up front with Rooney. I dont think Sven can justify dropping Crouch, but no doubt he will stick with his favourite Michael Owen.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Is your Apple Watch supported? Check the watchOS 27 compatibility list

      By +Warwagon · Posted

      They already threw the Ultra 1st gen under the bus?
    • Apple unveils Siri AI, a "reimagined" version of SIri

      By sagum · Posted

      Right, Google... because that's who this is going to. Google, the company who's entire business model is geared around ad revenue and your personal data.
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups

      By deadonthefloor · Posted

      That is the natural course for regulations. First to protect the consumer. Then to protect the business/industry from upstart competition. There are countless examples across history.
    • LibreOffice developer takes a dig at Euro-Office in new open letter

      By Ccl Ncc · Posted

      I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame

      By grunger106 · Posted

      Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      86
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!