Recommended Posts

I think it would be best for him to go out on loan from January in Italy so he gets fit and ready to go from the next season and with the takeover happening soon and if it is Kia who takes over West Ham he bring MSI to Upton Park so that will mean more foreign players i.e Brazilians/Argentinians... :unsure:

Possibly, they've hardly been an advert for foreign players looking to join West Ham though and I think part of it is to do with the fact that West Ham just aren't good enough...(this is coming from a Fulham fan by the way so feel free to have a go in return lol). In the few matches Tevez and Mascherano have played you could see how well Mascherano was creating plays from midfield and Tevez was making some nice passes and runs into and around the box but the West Ham players just weren't on the same wavelength it seemed. I think if they went to Italy they might just want to stay there which is a shame because Tevez is a great physical player and would be awesome for the Premier League if he was on form.

MSI would first have to make sure the players got enough caps otherwise they won't be able to get a work permit.

So they would have to loan them or place them in europe so they could then play in england.

I'm sure that how it works

Yeah the format they may go with could be a feeder club...West Ham may connect themselves with a club abroad maybe in Belgium or something until the player has enough caps to play in Premiership.

Possibly, they've hardly been an advert for foreign players looking to join West Ham though and I think part of it is to do with the fact that West Ham just aren't good enough...(this is coming from a Fulham fan by the way so feel free to have a go in return lol). In the few matches Tevez and Mascherano have played you could see how well Mascherano was creating plays from midfield and Tevez was making some nice passes and runs into and around the box but the West Ham players just weren't on the same wavelength it seemed. I think if they went to Italy they might just want to stay there which is a shame because Tevez is a great physical player and would be awesome for the Premier League if he was on form.

Yeah I agree with you Tevz is a great player when he gets going but the West Ham team are mainly English and dont know this continental football that these players play so it never really works out.

At least 3 men were quite relieved with the matches they had. One of course Wayne Rooney, who ends his 2 month long goal drought with a superb hat-trick and the other two are managers Rafael Ben?tez and Alan Pardew. Manchester United scored at the Reebok Stadium where nobody did yet in this season of premiership, and scored 4 times. :devil:: Wayne Rooney's fantastic hat-trick and a goal from Christiano Ronaldo made it 3 points for the visitors and that takes United back to the top of the table. They team were definitely the better one, the defense was very good they were passing the ball quite well, a lovely movement in the midfield during that Evra shot, and that guy J??skel?inen was awesome. He surely saved 2-3 sure goals, and those saves were really awesome. Evra's kick was heading in and it was a superb effort from J??skel?inen to stop it. And then he came charing towards Saha in the first half which was a chance for Saha. J??skel?inen's saves ensured that the final score wasn':rofl:-6 :rofl:

As for Liverpool, they played a lot better this time and handed Villa their first defeat this season. Crouch's goal was quite cool! Man how does he do that!:laugh:; :laugh: Rafa will get some smile back on his face now. Even Pardew, who's side ended the record of eight consecutive defeats and five league games without a goal.

Chelsea won 0-2, but I really think that had Webber scored in that penalty, Blades could have had something better at home. Everton scored first at the Emirates and then Van Persie equalised for the Gunners to earn a point.

West Ham United's board is finalising talks with Kia Joorabchian and his Israeli backer, Eli Papouchado. A ?75m takeover offer will be made on the completion of due diligence; likely before close of business on Friday.

That will allow last season's FA Cup finalists to approach a tricky run of fixtures, involving Arsenal, Middlesbrough and Chelsea, fully focused on football. The desire to minimise off-the-field distraction means that, after submitting to three weeks' examination of the club's books by Papouchado's advisers, Rothschild, the Upton Park board is unwilling to go through a protracted due diligence process with another party.

Interesting...I didnt want him to take the club over because that means they'll oust pardew and bring in speccy sven:((

What a god awful display by Liverpool. Absolutely no belief and they had no control in the game. I still don't understand Rafael Benitez's decision to keep Gerrard on the right when everybody knows he's more effective in the center.

On another note, Mark Gonzalez was god awful today and I think Jermaine Pennant should have played from the start. Alonso and Riise were two other non-factors.

Mr. Benitez has some explaining to do and Liverpool better get back on track if they want to have any hopes of finishing in the top 2.

Dissapointing stuff Reds :no:

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!