Recommended Posts

In my quest to find out the truth about Aero Diamond, I got the official word from a Microsft manager who worked directly with or overlooked the codename "Diamond" project.

Diamond was the codename for the Media Center functionality in Vista. Aero is the codename/feature name for the 3D desktop. Looks to me like someone jammed them together.
Technically, Aero Diamond did not exist. Aero did, and so did Diamond, but not as Aero Diamond. So what the ATI presentation slide was referring to was only to the Media Centre experience. Someone along the way must have combined the terms Aero and Diamond to describe the UI in Vista's Media Center, but that mislead many Vista community members.

From that point onwards, people labelled Aero Diamond as an UI experience a tier above Aero Glass and began to speculate what it looked like. Of course, during the few years as a rumour, no one could ever discover what it looked like. This lead some to believe it was Microsoft's secret theme for Vista, but no one could prove it. And now we now why.

Aero will ship.

Diamond will ship.

Aero Diamond did not exist and will definetely not ship with Windows Vista

From my blog: http://www.istartedsomething.com/20060810/aero-diamond-doesnt-exist-is-not-coming/

There was much more than just the ATI slide that discussed an "AERO Diamond" "theme". One of the more notable being when it actually showed up in the WinSAT help file. It most certainly did exist at one point. Perhaps it wont ever see the light of day, but it was discussed and worked on for a while. If he claims that it doesn't and never did exist, then he's just trying to cover it up now.

That's inaccurate.

Aero Diamond did exist and it's well documented. It was ment to be the highest tier of Aero but since the Diamond name was being used as a codename by the ehome team it was scrapped. It was just a codename they threw about which was then put into documentation and that's how ATi picked up on it originally.

Trying to prove that Aero Dimond does not exist by quoting MS officials is pritty pointless.

The whole argument of Aero Dimond is that it's a secret suprise, still to come, late in the Vista development.

If there is indeed a Aero Dimond coming (which there may or may not be), it's going to be denied, by all MS employees, until it shows up.

I'd speculate it could eventually surface as an additional theme to Vista for those who use MCE. Like Royale in XP.

But Tom, Media Centre is no longer an additional SKU. In Vista, Media Centre is just another application. How would Microsoft provide an additional theme just for users who install this application? Would people who purchase Vista Ultimate but choose not to install Media Centre get this theme too?

I don't think Aero Diamond is an additional theme. True, it was internally documented, but it could have just been used to codename the UI for the Media Centre application. Since obviously it wasn't Glass, but something that reflected the aesthetics of Aero. And one guy thought it might have been smart to combine "Aero", the general UI aesthetics with "Diamond", the codename for Media Centre.

May I remind you all of Vector Glass? Aero Diamond is Vector Glass, Vector Glass is just the codename, Aero Diamond is the true name. Here is a video at a Microsoft demo of what vector glass is(link1), but this is an old build of Longhorn, Aero Diamond will look way better, and here is a video of how to trigger Aero Diamond in Vista but fails to begin all the way(link2)!

link1: http://winsupersite.com/files/winhec2005_glass_demo.wmv

link2: http://www.aeroxp.org/board/index.php?show...amp;#entry37356

I don't think Aero Diamond still exist. We have Aero, Windows Basic and Windows Classic Theme. So what the heck should be Aero Diamond? It should be the highest of those three. So Aero Diamond is our Aero. And there won't be any vector glass. Just my thought...

But Tom, Media Centre is no longer an additional SKU. In Vista, Media Centre is just another application. How would Microsoft provide an additional theme just for users who install this application? Would people who purchase Vista Ultimate but choose not to install Media Centre get this theme too?

I don't think Aero Diamond is an additional theme. True, it was internally documented, but it could have just been used to codename the UI for the Media Centre application. Since obviously it wasn't Glass, but something that reflected the aesthetics of Aero. And one guy thought it might have been smart to combine "Aero", the general UI aesthetics with "Diamond", the codename for Media Centre.

What Tom said is possible, don't forget MCE functionality is not included in all versions of Vista. The "Aero Diamond" could possibly be an additional theme that is only available in "MCE enabled" versions of Vista, just a thought.

considering it was an idea throwen around by ATi god knows considering they maybe dissolving into amd..

maybe it was an idea for beta 1 but never showed up at winhec 2005. just like others probably a dropped feature

traces are probably still in it like alot of things are but dosent mean they will ever work like they were planned to. so the registry modifications arnt that much proof and considering what you have in your sig i think you sound just like a religious preacher for a thing that dosent exsist a.k.a aero diamond. and i dunno when you done your sig but windows vista by default for a long time now has DirectX 10 installed. so i dont see why you may think its a directx 10 hidden feature or somthing because it isnt.

May I remind you all of Vector Glass? Aero Diamond is Vector Glass, Vector Glass is just the codename, Aero Diamond is the true name. Here is a video at a Microsoft demo of what vector glass is(link1), but this is an old build of Longhorn, Aero Diamond will look way better, and here is a video of how to trigger Aero Diamond in Vista but fails to begin all the way(link2)!

link1: http://winsupersite.com/files/winhec2005_glass_demo.wmv

link2: http://www.aeroxp.org/board/index.php?show...amp;#entry37356

That has been dropped, we're approaching 2 years after that idea was brought into the product. You'd see it in betas by now if it was going to ship for RTM!

the image in your sig is a blowen up concept image done obviously with photoshop or along-the-lines of program the same and dosent show any proof or anything, the background image in ur sig is the default wallpaper in 4074 figure how old that is...

Ahah!

If you think MS will add a large feature like "vector glass" you must be dreamin man. The development process is near completion, and MS wants to test every bit so that the OS is as much bug-free as thay can. Do you think they will add a complex feature on RC1, and shop it without proper testing?

The thing we can see is a new theme, but even that I doubt, because MS is polishing the current Aero. Why would they polish it, if it was to be dropped? Also, current Aero is everywhere in Vista site and keynotes.

And even if they introduce "vector glass", who gives a damn if it looks the same as current Aero? The thing is that it can scale to large resolutions, being resolution independent.

But you know, we still don't pay taxes for dreaming.

What Tom said is possible, don't forget MCE functionality is not included in all versions of Vista. The "Aero Diamond" could possibly be an additional theme that is only available in "MCE enabled" versions of Vista, just a thought.

They've already added a premium theme for MCE+ editions of vista, its called Aero Glass, and its not available in Home Basic.

Aero Diamond is coming, look at my sig, thats what Aero Diamond is. Compare that to the current buttons in the titlebar! :)

Yeah, I was wondering about that picture, too... But it was originally from here. And from that page, you can basically see that the picture was included only to demonstrate transparencies in Windows Aero. Here's the caption under the picture:

Windows Vista Aero provides spectacular visual effects such as glass-like interface elements that you can see through.

considering it was an idea throwen around by ATi god knows considering they maybe dissolving into amd..

maybe it was an idea for beta 1 but never showed up at winhec 2005. just like others probably a dropped feature

traces are probably still in it like alot of things are but dosent mean they will ever work like they were planned to. so the registry modifications arnt that much proof and considering what you have in your sig i think you sound just like a religious preacher for a thing that dosent exsist a.k.a aero diamond. and i dunno when you done your sig but windows vista by default for a long time now has DirectX 10 installed. so i dont see why you may think its a directx 10 hidden feature or somthing because it isnt.

By "DirectX 10 installed" he means the computer has a DirectX 10 graphic card. Right now, nobody owns one of those. 'Aero Diamond' was supposed to use DirectX 9 to render anyway.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Chrome 149.0.7827.156 (offline installer) by Razvan Serea The web browser is arguably the most important piece of software on your computer. You spend much of your time online inside a browser: when you search, chat, email, shop, bank, read the news, and watch videos online, you often do all this using a browser. Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology to make the web faster, safer, and easier. Use one box for everything--type in the address bar and get suggestions for both search and Web pages. Thumbnails of your top sites let you access your favorite pages instantly with lightning speed from any new tab. Desktop shortcuts allow you to launch your favorite Web apps straight from your desktop. Chrome has many useful features built in, including automatic full-page translation and access to thousands of apps, extensions, and themes from the Chrome Web Store. Google Chrome is one of the best solutions for Internet browsing giving you high level of security, speed and great features. This update includes 33 security fixes. [N/A][516496659] Critical CVE-2026-12437: Use after free in WebShare. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516947912] Critical CVE-2026-12438: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][519728275] Critical CVE-2026-12439: Use after free in Digital Credentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][519731619] Critical CVE-2026-12440: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520157118] Critical CVE-2026-12441: Use after free in File Input. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521950423] Critical CVE-2026-12442: Use after free in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 [N/A][522566295] Critical CVE-2026-12443: Use after free in Web Authentication. Reported by Google on 2026-06-11 [N/A][513160088] High CVE-2026-12444: Out of bounds read in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513199795] High CVE-2026-12445: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513313107] High CVE-2026-12446: Insufficient data validation in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513405023] High CVE-2026-12447: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513458233] High CVE-2026-12448: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513480539] High CVE-2026-12449: Use after free in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][514531776] High CVE-2026-12450: Inappropriate implementation in Media. Reported by Zhixin Tu on 2026-05-19 [N/A][514741076] High CVE-2026-12451: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-05-19 [N/A][515462244] High CVE-2026-12452: Use after free in Downloads. Reported by Google on 2026-05-21 [N/A][516448843] High CVE-2026-12453: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516926968] High CVE-2026-12454: Race in Safe Browsing. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517069848] High CVE-2026-12455: Use after free in Tab Strip. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517124587] High CVE-2026-12456: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517153117] High CVE-2026-12457: Insufficient data validation in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517258337] High CVE-2026-12458: Incorrect security UI in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517406035] High CVE-2026-12459: Inappropriate implementation in Serial. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517484284] High CVE-2026-12460: Insufficient policy enforcement in File System Access. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517727318] High CVE-2026-12461: Out of bounds read in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][517916024] High CVE-2026-12462: Use after free in Media. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][518042749] High CVE-2026-12463: Inappropriate implementation in Views. Reported by Google on 2026-05-30 [N/A][519358344] High CVE-2026-12464: Use after free in Browser. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520189702] High CVE-2026-12465: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Metrics. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520199394] High CVE-2026-12466: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520202726] High CVE-2026-12467: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521485244] High CVE-2026-12468: Inappropriate implementation in Updater. Reported by Google on 2026-06-08 [N/A][521618871] High CVE-2026-12469: Uninitialized Use in GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 Important to know! The offline installer links do not include the automatic update feature. Download web installer: Google Chrome Web 32-bit | Google Chrome 64-bit | Freeware Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 64-bit | Direct Link | 131.0 MB Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 32-bit | Direct Link | 119.0 MB Download page: Google Chrome Portable Download: Chrome ARM64 | Direct Link View: Chrome Website | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • they couldnt do W11 LTSC so the support lasts longer....
    • The fact that the pref is not enabled by default tells you that what you see is what you get...for now. Hopefully the final version will have all the quirks ironed out.
    • It's enterprise, not consumer. And "...affected scenarios involve third-party software..." Would be good to know that in headline, not way down in the article. Instead, you lead with Windows update, which is not very helpful and misleading, IMHO. Just saying.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!