Lost - Season Three


Recommended Posts

I think you guys are all missing it.....

They didn't get all that information from Jack from outside the island...

They got the information from Jack's head. They gave him some type of drug that caused him to start having halucinations... side effects of the drugs... They took or copied jack's whole life out of his brain and wrote it down. Surely it is possilbe they came up with that type of research.

Or they could have drugged him with truth syrim and asked him all these questions again, like an animal to gain his trust and then shock him by showing him they have all the answers.

sorry for bad spelling.

On the other hand, season 2 showed us that the others already know a lot about the survivors, without delving into drug-induced hypnosis.

It's a possibility, but my guess is that they have access to the outside world.

ROFL @ S03E01

Give me a break. This are the "others"?!... A bunch of hippies that discuss about books?. Come on.

And this "Ben", wow, he is talking back what they did in the hatch?. lol

Ahh. I see. They replace the damn button to 'clues' to solve. And the 'control' is not a timer but an +45 years old ladie with sexual represion. HAHA. This is Lost, and we are.

Just waiting to the next hilarious ep. This season start bad and will end bad. Nothing like the seconds season, where the 'group' has an objective. Survive. And what they do now?. Dont make me laugh

Ah, and be aware. The Others knows EVERYTHING. LOL **** that

On the other hand, season 2 showed us that the others already know a lot about the survivors, without delving into drug-induced hypnosis.

It's a possibility, but my guess is that they have access to the outside world.

That is a good point. They proved in the past to know certain things about many of the survivors. Remember they had a whole list of every survivor from the tail, like the day of or after the crash?

Now drug-induced hypnosis certainly could get out some internal thoughts that their private investigations or internet research could not bring up. Very useful when they are trying to break down Jack and take away his will.

Yes, I just checked!

Even in the beginning, Adam calls her "Julia" but she tells Jack "Hi.. Jack. I'm Juliet"

Obviously she's another treacherous lying ***&% and Jack's falling for it! Oh noes!

Actually, Adam calls her "Julie". She introduces herself to Jack as Juliet, which is what Ben calls her at the end when he tells her she did good work.

If she was going to use a fake name for herself, do you really think she would have chosen something that was only 1 letter off from her real name? I think it's much more likely that Julie is short for Juliet.

The thing about this show is that very small things can later turn out to be important. Because of this, I have noticed that people sometimes take very small, insignificant things that aren't even relevant to the plot and focus in on them.

I thought of something yesterday that intrigued me a bit.

When it comes to the audience and fans of Lost, I am compelled to come to the conclusion that those who are most obsessive and most fanatical about the show actually enjoy the show less than the casual fan.

The casual fan allows the storyteller to tell his tale. He listens, enjoys the twists and turns, and awaits each installment, wanting to know what happens next. There is some natural tendency to think ahead and try to put the pieces together, but nothing severe.

The fanatic, however, studies each episode as if there were a mid-term the next morning. He compiles clues, reads blogs, theorizes, postulates, dissects even the most innocuous details. Most importantly, he doesn't let the storyteller do his job. He tries to write the story before its told, and when it is told, is almost universally disappointed by the outcome, not because it is a bad story, but because it does not match their theory.

just a thought.

I thought of something yesterday that intrigued me a bit.

When it comes to the audience and fans of Lost, I am compelled to come to the conclusion that those who are most obsessive and most fanatical about the show actually enjoy the show less than the casual fan.

The casual fan allows the storyteller to tell his tale. He listens, enjoys the twists and turns, and awaits each installment, wanting to know what happens next. There is some natural tendency to think ahead and try to put the pieces together, but nothing severe.

The fanatic, however, studies each episode as if there were a mid-term the next morning. He compiles clues, reads blogs, theorizes, postulates, dissects even the most innocuous details. Most importantly, he doesn't let the storyteller do his job. He tries to write the story before its told, and when it is told, is almost universally disappointed by the outcome, not because it is a bad story, but because it does not match their theory.

just a thought.

I have to agree with this, I find myself staying away from most lost stuff for fear of spoilers of the next episode.

I thought of something yesterday that intrigued me a bit.

When it comes to the audience and fans of Lost, I am compelled to come to the conclusion that those who are most obsessive and most fanatical about the show actually enjoy the show less than the casual fan.

The casual fan allows the storyteller to tell his tale. He listens, enjoys the twists and turns, and awaits each installment, wanting to know what happens next. There is some natural tendency to think ahead and try to put the pieces together, but nothing severe.

The fanatic, however, studies each episode as if there were a mid-term the next morning. He compiles clues, reads blogs, theorizes, postulates, dissects even the most innocuous details. Most importantly, he doesn't let the storyteller do his job. He tries to write the story before its told, and when it is told, is almost universally disappointed by the outcome, not because it is a bad story, but because it does not match their theory.

just a thought.

Totally agree :yes:

You know I refresh this page Over and Over for new ideas? :p

You asked where the sig came from...another one of my blogs (I have to many!!!)

http://gossip.rapnix.com/2006/10/01/evangeline-in-parade/

I seem to be refreshing alot as well....plus a bit of lost scoopage....new cast member cast to lost for 2 episodes

http://lost.rapnix.com/2006/10/05/kristin-unveils-scoop/

*nevermind* .. i just spent a few minutes perusing the lost wikipedia--

"She then gave birth to a daughter, Alex, and shortly afterwards a plume of black smoke appeared and "the Others" kidnapped Alex."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characters_of...nielle_Rousseau

daughter~

Did you fellas get that the bear cage that sawyer was in that took the bears "2 hours to figure out" were probly the same polar bears that sawyer killed in the beginning of the first season? Coooool.

So here is my theory. The others really want a Zoo, so they are going to turn Sawyer into a polar bear, Kate into a tiger (that wears a dress), and Jack into a Dolphin.

Edited by RGSPro
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!