Lost - Season Three


Recommended Posts

That's an interesting idea. So many possibilities, I'm just going crazy thinking of all the information we got :wacko: Can't wait for more!

In theory they could also tap into one of those underwater fiber optic cables, if one ran near the island.

Or depending on the tech, something like WiMax could work...assuming they are close to civilization.

truly amazing, i wonder who the hell that kid was... in the cell across from sawyer. i highly doubt that was just a one time thing. hell, nothing is a one time thing on lost :D

I am thinking he was a decoy...meant to see how Sawyer would react to certain situations. You saw how easy he got out of that cell right?

In theory they could also tap into one of those underwater fiber optic cables, if one ran near the island.

Or depending on the tech, something like WiMax could work...assuming they are close to civilization.

there was that cable that ran into the ocean sayid found way back in season 1...

Perhaps they didn't have to do any research at all... maybe they drugged Jack and he told them all about himself. We assume that we saw the first time he woke up, but maybe he was awake before, but under the influence of some serious drugs.

I do think they did outside research though, I just wanted to throw that theory out there.

Ok i agree with them getting the autopsy report from the coffin....there may have been some information about the next of kin in there.....that folder could've been all fake though.......as after she came out ben said "nice job".....so she could've bluffed her way through that......when he asked if his wife was happy....she could've totally made that up by saying "she's happy"......imo at least

They prolly have internet (Satellite?) and thats how they got all the info. I still wish jack would have kicked some ass when she came into the room. He should have grabbed her taser then and used it on "Ben" then knocked her out and run like hell. O well maybe in the next episode.

Oh and Jack was getting pretty dehydrated and low on sugars etc, thats probably why she could knock him out(not to mention the rigors of swimming in that current!).

Or shes like any other .. Other and is extremely strong.

Wow... just WOW! I loved it.. now I really do wish it was 2 hours long. :blush:

Think Tags would be best bet until everyone has seen...:)

Again, this was discussed in the season two thread. The only thing that should be posted in spoiler tags are spoilers about episodes that haven't aired yet.

All information about the episode that is airing or any episode already shown shouldn't be shown in spoiler tags. The title of the thread even says "spoilers and theories, be warned".

Why would anyone want to come in this thread an hour or two before the episode airs anyway? Everyone on the west coast should know that as soon as 7pm rolls around, the spoilers are comin'.

Edited by Jack31081

They would need Internet access (possible for sure) and probably a bunch of private investigators to pull that off.

I think you guys are all missing it.....

They didn't get all that information from Jack from outside the island...

They got the information from Jack's head. They gave him some type of drug that caused him to start having halucinations... side effects of the drugs... They took or copied jack's whole life out of his brain and wrote it down. Surely it is possilbe they came up with that type of research.

Or they could have drugged him with truth syrim and asked him all these questions again, like an animal to gain his trust and then shock him by showing him they have all the answers.

sorry for bad spelling.

They're not bluffing:

Jack: ...My ex-wife---

Juliet: Sarah?

She knew her name.

Also, am I the only one that caught Juliet's lie?

Didn't she tell Jack her name was "Juliet" but Ben said "Good work, Julia"

????????

or not?

EDIT

Yes, I just checked!

Even in the beginning, Adam calls her "Julia" but she tells Jack "Hi.. Jack. I'm Juliet"

Obviously she's another treacherous lying ***&% and Jack's falling for it! Oh noes!

I wonder if they know about Monica Dean? I want to know!

When does Monica show up again!?????!!

PLEASE??~

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!