Microsoft unviels ZUNE - Official


Recommended Posts

Microsoft have missed the main market with this IMO. The ipod nano is more popular than the big ipod because of its size, price, bright colours (now), Zune would make more of an impact if it entered the mp3 player market with something more nano like to establish its brand and then expand its range to larger. or expensive products. Many people will be put off buying an expensive mp3 player from a virtually unknown brand.

Thats just my 2 cents.

the player looks nice, the one thing that stands out to me though is the packaging, as it reminds me a lot of a microsoft internal video showing how they get it so wrong with packaging generally (i.e. too much info, compatibility, specs etc on it)...

Seems someone took this on board though...

... this is the video i was on about :

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=36...=microsoft+ipod

the player looks nice, the one thing that stands out to me though is the packaging, as it reminds me a lot of a microsoft internal video showing how they get it so wrong with packaging generally (i.e. too much info, compatibility, specs etc on it)...

Seems someone took this on board though...

... this is the video i was on about :

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=36...=microsoft+ipod

I don't know what you mean about the packaging. But i for one think it looks sleek, stylish very defining of the product that lies inside.

On a side note that 30gb hd turns out being how large when plugged into a PC?

Microsoft have missed the main market with this IMO. The ipod nano is more popular than the big ipod because of its size, price, bright colours (now), Zune would make more of an impact if it entered the mp3 player market with something more nano like to establish its brand and then expand its range to larger. or expensive products. Many people will be put off buying an expensive mp3 player from a virtually unknown brand.

Thats just my 2 cents.

I believe a flash based Zune player is scheduled for 2007.
Zune Battery Life: 12 Hours Music, 3.5 Hours Video

Posted September 17, 2006 * Comments(0)

Apple iPod Battery Status

Yeah, it?s a somewhat minor-seeming detail, but no one seemed to know how much damned battery life the Zune was going to have at launch. They were pretty tight lipped about it, but our new pal Matt Rosoff, a Microsoft analyst, let us know that according to his contacts, with wireless off we can expect a 12 hours of music playback at 128Kbps, 3.5 hours for video playback, and 4.5 hours when running a slide show. Compare that to the 30GB iPod?s 14/4 hours and the 80GB iPod?s 20/6 hours, and it?s a little difficult to fully envision the payoff for that added thickness and height. Still, remember: bigger screen, wireless, bigger screen, wireless. Ah well, we?ll just hope upon hope that?ll be something the fix before release in a couple months.

Courtesy: engadget.com

Taken from www.zuneuser.com

Lucky thing your iPod plays audio for up to 20 hours.(2) Or, if you?d rather watch, you can feast your eyes on movies and TV shows for up to six-and-a-half hours.(3)

Taken from mac.com

***The battery life on the iPod refers to the 80gb model.

Compare and discuss.

Taken from www.zuneuser.com

Taken from mac.com

***The battery life on the iPod refers to the 80gb model.

Compare and discuss.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=587890438

heh

We should have these 2 threads merged or something. :huh: Because it seems kinda pointless talking about the battery in 2 threads.

  • 3 weeks later...

The only way any MP3 player can beat the iPod would be to have the ability to output DVD quality video (720x480), include the A/V cable in the base package, and sell it for less than $349. It would need to have at LEAST 40GB (with more being better), and come with tools designed to convert videos into a portable format for playback.

The only company that would able to take on the MPAA and RIAA is Microsoft and it has failed by my standards.

Of course, the REAL problem here is that even IF Microsoft wanted to integrate it's services into Windows and make them better, the EU would call foul so fast, it's not even worth the time.

The only way any MP3 player can beat the iPod would be to have the ability to output DVD quality video (720x480), include the A/V cable in the base package, and sell it for less than $349. It would need to have at LEAST 40GB (with more being better), and come with tools designed to convert videos into a portable format for playback.

The Zen Vision:M qualifies for two of those criteria, the video output quality and it coming with conversion tools. Then of course there's the new 60 gig version. The main thing is it doesn't come with the cable.

Dumb Dumb Dumb. Unless they tone down the DRM a bit, and get a decent interface for the sync features, I'm sticking with Apple.

Haha i find that hilarious, you talk about DRM and syncing features and then you say youll stick with Apple, they are the worst, their DRM ties you into itunes and ipod, you cant play the music on any other player and syncing you are stuck with itunes or the 3rd party crap tools.

The black looks just like a more pooey version of brown really...were they out of colour to make it more saturated or what? White looks nice, but brown should've been 'brownier' as well.

I like the big screen and orientation change feature, very nice. I wonder of there will be some homebrew to make use of wireless and so on...

the brown one looks horrible IMHO, but I think the white and black ones are good.

Seems Microsoft are trying to redefine "black" as well.

All the photo's/video's I have seem on the "black" zune actually are dark grey - definately not "black"

The black looks just like a more pooey version of brown really

yes - certainly I wouldn't call it black!

I like the big screen and orientation change feature, very nice. I wonder of there will be some homebrew to make use of wireless and so on...

I can see the linux fanbois clammering over themselves to see who can install linux on it first :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      258
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!