MS Modifies black maximized borders


Recommended Posts

Yes, it is. Box check = black maximized windows. Box unchecked = transparent maximized windows.

No, it isn't. I don't code operating systems, but even I know it's not that easy. And even if it was, MS has other things to focus on: bugs that affect everyone, not just 1% of the user base that is whining about the colour of 1/30th of their monitor that they will probably end up theming within a month. Not to mention, we're between RC1 and RC2, a change like that can create new bugs too.

If you ask me, there should be the following radio buttons in the color customization dialog...

Appearance of maximized windows and the taskbar:

( ) "Black" titlebars and taskbar (Default)

( ) Transparent titlebars and taskbar

( ) Opaque titlebars and taskbar

I personally would go for the third option. Keep the colors and look the same, just go from transparent to opaque.

No, it isn't. I don't code operating systems, but even I know it's not that easy. And even if it was, MS has other things to focus on: bugs that affect everyone, not just 1% of the user base that is whining about the colour of 1/30th of their monitor that they will probably end up theming within a month. Not to mention, we're between RC1 and RC2, a change like that can create new bugs too.

First of all, it's not a bug. It's an annoyance that's bothering the **** out of a large number of Vista testers. Second, there are a lot of assumptions when the blogger says "1% of 1% of 1% are the ones whining about it." Third, this can't be that difficult to do because the blog says that they ARE changing it (only slightly, though). And color change introducing more bugs? You're crazy! All they have to do is keep the aero glass on maximized windows. If they hadn't messed with it in the first place, there wouldn't be any changes to make at all.

The only thing i wanted microsoft to do with this black taskbar was give a good enough option just to change it's color to whatever we want... Since it was the only thing that u can't change the color for.. I'm not sure about the sidebar since i find that the sidebars are more dead now a days then anything..

(Probably) new taskbar style: img_start_tv.jpg

(Probably) new sidebar style

img_windows_main3.jpg

(Probably) new start menu style

img_windows_main4.jpg

All images are from microsoft-

-Don't blame me if they aren't what it's going to be, and remember they are quite old! But still i like them more than the current style

I can't believe you still think they aren't doing their best. I want my window to be 6 inches thick and white. Joe Blow wants it completely transparent. MS can't listen to every beta tester and give them what they want. Did you even read the blog?

Who says MS has only changed one thing? :sleep:

I can't believe you still think they aren't doing their best. I want my window to be 6 inches thick and white. Joe Blow wants it completely transparent. MS can't listen to every beta tester and give them what they want. Did you even read the blog?

Who says MS has only changed one thing? :sleep:

They *ARENT* doing their best, and you can't honestly sit there and believe that they are. If I have my windows set to X color, when I maximize my window, it should look EXACTLY the same. It should be the same color, same shade, same everything. In WindowsXP, when you maximize my windows, they don't turn black to "focus on the content" do they?

If they want to use that excuse because they say if aero glass is enabled, you'll see through the transparent titlebar and lose focus... then um... DISABLE TRANSPARENCY. There is no need for the black in the first place.

If they WERE doing their best, they would give the user the choice of what they want. How it should be.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't have waited until MAY to release BETA2, which was at best, a pre-alpha release.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't have taken 5 years to release Vista.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't say that every screw-up in Vista is because of time, money, or priorities.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't have given Vista less than a year for developing, testing, bug-fixing, and releasing it.

wow this is a lot of fuss over nothing, I dunno about most people but when I maximise a window, it's to look at whats in that window, not the titlebar. I probably would not have even noticed that they changed anything unless it was pointed out to me. However if people really must have it transparent, why not just manually size the window to fill the screen, doing that leave the titlebar transparent.

I hate the black, but I hate even more the way they do it.

If only they fade the window to black or something.

But has they do it, it looks very unpolished. You maximize a window and dang, black everywhere.

Also, why the hell do they turn the taskbar black, and turn off the transparency of it?

They *ARENT* doing their best, and you can't honestly sit there and believe that they are. If I have my windows set to X color, when I maximize my window, it should look EXACTLY the same. It should be the same color, same shade, same everything. In WindowsXP, when you maximize my windows, they don't turn black to "focus on the content" do they?

If they want to use that excuse because they say if aero glass is enabled, you'll see through the transparent titlebar and lose focus... then um... DISABLE TRANSPARENCY. There is no need for the black in the first place.

If they WERE doing their best, they would give the user the choice of what they want. How it should be.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't have waited until MAY to release BETA2, which was at best, a pre-alpha release.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't have taken 5 years to release Vista.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't say that every screw-up in Vista is because of time, money, or priorities.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't have given Vista less than a year for developing, testing, bug-fixing, and releasing it.

Maybe they know that you are not smart enough to choose for yourself. So they have to do it for you.

They *ARENT* doing their best, and you can't honestly sit there and believe that they are. If I have my windows set to X color, when I maximize my window, it should look EXACTLY the same. It should be the same color, same shade, same everything. In WindowsXP, when you maximize my windows, they don't turn black to "focus on the content" do they?

If they want to use that excuse because they say if aero glass is enabled, you'll see through the transparent titlebar and lose focus... then um... DISABLE TRANSPARENCY. There is no need for the black in the first place.

If they WERE doing their best, they would give the user the choice of what they want. How it should be.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't have waited until MAY to release BETA2, which was at best, a pre-alpha release.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't have taken 5 years to release Vista.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't say that every screw-up in Vista is because of time, money, or priorities.

If they WERE doing their best, they wouldn't have given Vista less than a year for developing, testing, bug-fixing, and releasing it.

Ok, I'll take the bait.

Hey, maybe they *should* give the user the choice of what they want. I mean, there's only a few hundred million users out there, and clearly, everyone should be able to have it *their* way. Cause this is Burger King. That way, Windows can add options willy-nilly and end up with a million different options that 99% of the people will never use and clutter up all the control panels. Then Windows will be really good and take another 2 years just so all the options can be completely written, internationalized, tested, debugged, etc. Every time you add an option, you increase the number of codepaths that need to be tested by a lot.

Second of all, I don't think you actually bothered reading the blog post. It's not just that people will see through the transparency--the primary idea here was to use the letterbox effect to draw people's eyes to the content. Maybe you think it should do this or do that. Good for you. I'm sorry that you don't like it, and that it ruins your nice idea of what the interface should or shouldn't look like.

The last 3 points. Well, I'm not sure I understand, because points 3 and 5 seem to be in conflict. We've given it 5 years =)

Finally, for people who suggested the fade: think about what you're asking. If you want it to fade to black in the same time it takes the window to maximize, the fade time is going to be instantaneous--i.e. what happens now. Ok, you want it to fade slowly--now it's distracting that your window is changing colors after it's maximized. Why is it doing that!? Fine, we'll put a maximize animation in along with the fade. Ok, now window maximizing feels sluggish. Ok, let's make it as fast as the minimize animation. Gee, I don't think a 0.1 second fade works very well. &($#$(* Let's just remove the animation and fade, because anything else is just too distracting.

P.S. for all you people who are complaining, a much more observant complain would have been this: if I maximize a window on a display that my taskbar is not on, it still turns the taskbar black. The taskbar should remain transparent if there are no maximized windows on the same display as the taskbar.

Ok, I'll take the bait.

Hey, maybe they *should* give the user the choice of what they want. I mean, there's only a few hundred million users out there, and clearly, everyone should be able to have it *their* way. Cause this is Burger King. That way, Windows can add options willy-nilly and end up with a million different options that 99% of the people will never use and clutter up all the control panels. Then Windows will be really good and take another 2 years just so all the options can be completely written, internationalized, tested, debugged, etc. Every time you add an option, you increase the number of codepaths that need to be tested by a lot.

Second of all, I don't think you actually bothered reading the blog post. It's not just that people will see through the transparency--the primary idea here was to use the letterbox effect to draw people's eyes to the content. Maybe you think it should do this or do that. Good for you. I'm sorry that you don't like it, and that it ruins your nice idea of what the interface should or shouldn't look like.

The last 3 points. Well, I'm not sure I understand, because points 3 and 5 seem to be in conflict. We've given it 5 years =)

Finally, for people who suggested the fade: think about what you're asking. If you want it to fade to black in the same time it takes the window to maximize, the fade time is going to be instantaneous--i.e. what happens now. Ok, you want it to fade slowly--now it's distracting that your window is changing colors after it's maximized. Why is it doing that!? Fine, we'll put a maximize animation in along with the fade. Ok, now window maximizing feels sluggish. Ok, let's make it as fast as the minimize animation. Gee, I don't think a 0.1 second fade works very well. &($#$(* Let's just remove the animation and fade, because anything else is just too distracting.

P.S. for all you people who are complaining, a much more observant complain would have been this: if I maximize a window on a display that my taskbar is not on, it still turns the taskbar black. The taskbar should remain transparent if there are no maximized windows on the same display as the taskbar.

Adding three options (Turn black (or a selected color), Turn off transparency, or Do Nothing) I think would pretty much fit everyone's needs. That isn't willy-nilly, or a million different options. I can guarantee if nothing was done, when Vista was released and people began using it, MS would get plenty of calls asking why their window is changing to black when they set it to Red, or orange, or green, or pink. Taking 2 years to internationalize three options? That shouldn't happen... But yeah... it is Vista, so I wouldn't be surprised.

Yes, I read the blog post, and if you check the topic in the shell revealed forums, I have posted there too. I know what the purpose of turning the window black was. I don't care what the purpose was. I have my Aero set to Reddish color. I DO NOT want them black. I want Aero the color I picked, not Microsoft. Maximized windows have worked fine since 3.1, why do they need to introduce this "letter box" bull**** 14 years later?

For points 3 and 5... XP was released 5 years ago, they "supposedly" began working on Vista before that. However, to me, it seems like they sat around with their thumbs up their asses until Beta 2 was released in MAY of 2006. Beta 2 was such a debacle they needed to get as much feedback as possible, and that's when they started to actually begin really working on Vista. That's what I meant... I guess it was kind of confusing :blush:

And as for the fade/animation type thing... I think that the window could be able to have a quick maximize animation... then after it was completely maximized, it could have a nice soothing fade to the black, or whatever color it is being faded to.

And your P.S. that's been complained about too. :) Don't worry, the MS teams knows all about it. :p

what they should do is just make the glass themeing program able to change colour for complete aero interface so you can change the start menu and taskbar and windows and boarders to any colour you wish with hue and saturation

Adding three options (Turn black (or a selected color), Turn off transparency, or Do Nothing) I think would pretty much fit everyone's needs. That isn't willy-nilly, or a million different options. I can guarantee if nothing was done, when Vista was released and people began using it, MS would get plenty of calls asking why their window is changing to black when they set it to Red, or orange, or green, or pink. Taking 2 years to internationalize three options? That shouldn't happen... But yeah... it is Vista, so I wouldn't be surprised.

Yes, I read the blog post, and if you check the topic in the shell revealed forums, I have posted there too. I know what the purpose of turning the window black was. I don't care what the purpose was. I have my Aero set to Reddish color. I DO NOT want them black. I want Aero the color I picked, not Microsoft. Maximized windows have worked fine since 3.1, why do they need to introduce this "letter box" bull**** 14 years later?

For points 3 and 5... XP was released 5 years ago, they "supposedly" began working on Vista before that. However, to me, it seems like they sat around with their thumbs up their asses until Beta 2 was released in MAY of 2006. Beta 2 was such a debacle they needed to get as much feedback as possible, and that's when they started to actually begin really working on Vista. That's what I meant... I guess it was kind of confusing :blush:

And as for the fade/animation type thing... I think that the window could be able to have a quick maximize animation... then after it was completely maximized, it could have a nice soothing fade to the black, or whatever color it is being faded to.

And your P.S. that's been complained about too. :) Don't worry, the MS teams knows all about it. :p

Testosterone overload?

I imagine you punching the air and screaming at your monitor.

It's not that big a deal, it's just a color.

For what I read, the change won't even be very noticeable on the default color scheme, So I'm not expecting anything drastic at all regarding the black borders when maximized.

Testosterone overload?

I imagine you punching the air and screaming at your monitor.

It's not that big a deal, it's just a color.

Go read the shellrevealed forums... Go read Microsoft's response to everything that is said... and then you'll understand why I, as well as many other people are ****ed off with MS and Vista.

(Probably) new taskbar style: img_start_tv.jpg

(Probably) new sidebar style

img_windows_main3.jpg

(Probably) new start menu style

img_windows_main4.jpg

All images are from microsoft-

-Don't blame me if they aren't what it's going to be, and remember they are quite old! But still i like them more than the current style

See thats what they should do. its one of their concepts and they SHOULD folow it.

Adding three options (Turn black (or a selected color), Turn off transparency, or Do Nothing) I think would pretty much fit everyone's needs. That isn't willy-nilly, or a million different options. ...

His point was that this isn't going to be the only feature people complain about or love. In the end, the entire way the OS works has to be a compromise. Whether it's the color of a window or the way files are indexed, it's all a compromise. If MS were to give people what they want, there'd be 3 options for the transparency and then two or three for every other little nit pick aspect to the OS.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!