Recommended Posts

There's a reason why a lot of Dallas fans wanted Romo at the beginning of the season.

What I am tired of is Denvers overrated defense. Play someone! They sure did today.

BOOG, not to bring you down or anything, but you were the one who told me Romo was never good and would never be #1:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...98889&st=15

A while ago, yes, but he was the same player then.

BOOG, not to bring you down or anything, but you were the one who told me Romo was never good and would never be #1:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...98889&st=15

A while ago, yes, but he was the same player then.

:shiftyninja:

Looks like QB's from Eastern Illinois University can be the Cowboys' #1 starter ;)

If it takes 2 years of digging to prove me wrong, you win the award. /me looks for any other post in this thread about picks from you.....oh that's right..there are none.

'course, Romo 2 years ago isn't the same Romo now. See: Carson Palmer, Philip Rivers.

I was wrong. :) That's gotta make you feel good.

:p

If it takes 2 years of digging to prove me wrong, you win the award. /me looks for any other post in this thread about picks from you.....oh that's right..there are none.

'course, Romo 2 years ago isn't the same Romo now. See: Carson Palmer, Philip Rivers.

I was wrong. :) That's gotta make you feel good.

That's not what I'm saying, but way to twist my words. I just remembered you didn't like him, even though he had the exact same skills and mechanics then -- I even said he had a quick release and strong arm back then. He's the same guy, same mechanics, same skill, same everything. Read the thread from back then and it's not hard to see.

I wasn't trying to smear your face in it, just saying that you weren't one of those fans that was for him.

BOOG, you're a little paranoid buddy. I honestly didn't know who it was that told me Romo wasn't as good as Henson. I remembered someone said it, but wasn't sure who, and wanted to see what they thought of it now and if they changed their stance. Obviously you did. Never rubbed your face in it, but sorry if you feel that way.

And that would be two threads, but good try. And I wasn't trying to get your attention. I was trying to find out who it was, but I didn't know the football conversation had moved to the fantasy section.

This week's winner is Illicit :D congrats!

Illicit 9-5........+0 zing! right on the money!

Steffan 9-5........+5

BOOG 9-5...........+7

yisman 8-6.........+1

aessap 8-6.........+2

~Greeno~ 8-6.......+11

fluxCapacitor 8-6..+13

Adamb10 8-6........+14

[yt] 7-7...........+2

Toastyone 7-7......+4

D!ABOL!C 7-7.......+4

rap4life 7-7.......+8

L3thal 6-8.........+1

Xeonic 6-8.........+6

Virtualmadden 6-8..+7

NYU_KID 6-8........+9

no-sweat 5-9.......+1

Overall:

yisman...................... 75-39, +107

BOOGSoftball............. 75-39, +108

Flux Capacitor............ 74-40, +85

illicit.......................... 71-43, +91

[yt]........................... 71-43, +92

L3thal.........................71-43, +106

Toastyone.................. 70-46, +108

D!ABOL!C.................. 70-46, +117

aessap....................... 69-45, +68

Xeonic....................... 69-45, +99

Steffan...................... 69-45, +107

Virtualmadden............ 69-45, +133

Adamb10................... 68-46, +93

rap4life...................... 65-49, +142

~Greeno~..................61-37, +78

no-sweat................... 53-47, +96

NYU_KID....................52-46, +91

Yorak........................ 42-18, +61

XT............................. 31-15, +42

dj6ross...................... 23-19, +37

At the halfway point of the season everyone is running at the same pace +/- a few games compared to last year :)

Week 9 schedule:

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle

Edited by Toastyone

Without running the risk of sounding like a complete idiot :)

...here goes anyway...

What are the +'s for? something to do with point predictions? I'm curious as to what my +78 is for and if it's any good :D

Cheers fellas and keep up the good picking, someone will be a deserving winner this year, it's tight at the top!

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 30

Two upsets- Cleveland over San Diego, San Fransisco over Minnesota

zing!

Without running the risk of sounding like a complete idiot :)

...here goes anyway...

What are the +'s for? something to do with point predictions? I'm curious as to what my +78 is for and if it's any good :D

Cheers fellas and keep up the good picking, someone will be a deserving winner this year, it's tight at the top!

Yeah it is the number of points you have been off the Monday night game...it is for tiebreakers when two people have the same record.....It helps to have as low a + score as possible...Like in the overall standings Boog is tied with yisman, but yisman is ahead since he has 107 and boog has 108 ;) Hope that helps

I was being sarcastic...saying 'apparently three threads is trying' since you stated you weren't trying, and yet, there was another thread baiting the person (with a wink). Try to keep up. :)

I wasn't "baiting" the person (unlike what you are trying to do with your "Try to keep up" statement). I wanted to see their reaction to Romo's playing. How is that being rude about it?

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 29

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 25(no starting QB :) raiders can do it)

Week 9 schedule:

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle 35

I'll show some love to the 'skins even if you guys wont :p

Week 9:

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington I'm with you Greeno :)

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago Do they ever play a hard team?

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh If the Raiders can do it...

Indianapolis at New England I hate the Colts!! :laugh:

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 37

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 32

WEEK 9

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 38

Week 9 schedule:

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle 35

I'll show some love to the 'skins even if you guys wont :p

I'd like to change to :-

Indianapolis at New England

thx

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Oakland at Seattle - 34 Points

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No idea, frankly, I'm not into minimum requirements gaming, but it would be an interesting test to find out. Also, I just have to point out that it wasn't my intention to downplay the performance of DXVK on Linux. I just thought it would be good to point out that DXVK is not Linux DXVK.
    • Fastfetch 2.64 released bringing new logos and other improvements by David Uzondu Fastfetch, the popular command-line system information tool that developers created as a fast alternative to the classic Neofetch utility, has updated its codebase to version 2.64, bringing experimental scripting power, streamlined compilation options, a smarter logo renderer, and Codec module support. As noted earlier, Fastfetch can now detect hardware-accelerated video codecs across Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android through this new Codec module. On Linux and BSD, the utility uses VA-API by default, with a fallback to VDPAU on Nvidia hardware if compiled with libva and libvdpau. Windows users get D3D12VA on Windows 11 or D3D11VA with Media Foundation Transforms on older systems, while macOS relies on VideoToolbox and Android utilizes AMediaCodec. You can manually toggle Vulkan Video via the config file, and the program will report both encoders and decoders unless configured otherwise. Logo support for Quasar, Origami, Origami_small, NixOS2, and BerserkArch also landed in this release. BerserkArch, if you have never heard of it, is a specialized Arch Linux derivative that targets security researchers and power users. This distro comes with an offensive security tool manager, simply called berserk, which allows users to install complex hacking toolkits with single terminal commands. Moving on, Fastfetch now has experimental scripting options for custom formats using Lua or QuickJS. The Lua integration supports versions 5.3 through 5.5, sharing a single interpreter instance across all modules so you can store variables globally. T Alternatively, if you prefer JavaScript, you can use QuickJS-ng version 0.15.0 or newer to evaluate your custom formats with the qjs: prefix. Other changes that version 2.64 brings include native CMake compilation flags to disable specific modules to shrink the final binary size. Users can delete unwanted ASCII logo files directly from the source directory before building to save additional space. The format engine now boasts ANSI-escape awareness, meaning you can center text with the new vertical bar specifier without breaking colored outputs. Haiku users receive preliminary support for boot manager, window manager theme, screen brightness, and other basic properties. Finally, the Linux edition now extracts desktop wallpaper and theme details from the modern COSMIC desktop environment.
    • That's a good number until the game you want to play is not in that list. 
    • So, the logo means No ducking AI?
    • For sure, humanity us highly unlikely to survive the helium flash. Even if we have colonized moons in the outer planets by then, that is such a monumental change in heat output, coupled with the destruction of Earth, it's unlikely we could be fully prepared for changes of that scale.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      59
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!