Recommended Posts

There's a reason why a lot of Dallas fans wanted Romo at the beginning of the season.

What I am tired of is Denvers overrated defense. Play someone! They sure did today.

BOOG, not to bring you down or anything, but you were the one who told me Romo was never good and would never be #1:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...98889&st=15

A while ago, yes, but he was the same player then.

BOOG, not to bring you down or anything, but you were the one who told me Romo was never good and would never be #1:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...98889&st=15

A while ago, yes, but he was the same player then.

:shiftyninja:

Looks like QB's from Eastern Illinois University can be the Cowboys' #1 starter ;)

If it takes 2 years of digging to prove me wrong, you win the award. /me looks for any other post in this thread about picks from you.....oh that's right..there are none.

'course, Romo 2 years ago isn't the same Romo now. See: Carson Palmer, Philip Rivers.

I was wrong. :) That's gotta make you feel good.

:p

If it takes 2 years of digging to prove me wrong, you win the award. /me looks for any other post in this thread about picks from you.....oh that's right..there are none.

'course, Romo 2 years ago isn't the same Romo now. See: Carson Palmer, Philip Rivers.

I was wrong. :) That's gotta make you feel good.

That's not what I'm saying, but way to twist my words. I just remembered you didn't like him, even though he had the exact same skills and mechanics then -- I even said he had a quick release and strong arm back then. He's the same guy, same mechanics, same skill, same everything. Read the thread from back then and it's not hard to see.

I wasn't trying to smear your face in it, just saying that you weren't one of those fans that was for him.

BOOG, you're a little paranoid buddy. I honestly didn't know who it was that told me Romo wasn't as good as Henson. I remembered someone said it, but wasn't sure who, and wanted to see what they thought of it now and if they changed their stance. Obviously you did. Never rubbed your face in it, but sorry if you feel that way.

And that would be two threads, but good try. And I wasn't trying to get your attention. I was trying to find out who it was, but I didn't know the football conversation had moved to the fantasy section.

This week's winner is Illicit :D congrats!

Illicit 9-5........+0 zing! right on the money!

Steffan 9-5........+5

BOOG 9-5...........+7

yisman 8-6.........+1

aessap 8-6.........+2

~Greeno~ 8-6.......+11

fluxCapacitor 8-6..+13

Adamb10 8-6........+14

[yt] 7-7...........+2

Toastyone 7-7......+4

D!ABOL!C 7-7.......+4

rap4life 7-7.......+8

L3thal 6-8.........+1

Xeonic 6-8.........+6

Virtualmadden 6-8..+7

NYU_KID 6-8........+9

no-sweat 5-9.......+1

Overall:

yisman...................... 75-39, +107

BOOGSoftball............. 75-39, +108

Flux Capacitor............ 74-40, +85

illicit.......................... 71-43, +91

[yt]........................... 71-43, +92

L3thal.........................71-43, +106

Toastyone.................. 70-46, +108

D!ABOL!C.................. 70-46, +117

aessap....................... 69-45, +68

Xeonic....................... 69-45, +99

Steffan...................... 69-45, +107

Virtualmadden............ 69-45, +133

Adamb10................... 68-46, +93

rap4life...................... 65-49, +142

~Greeno~..................61-37, +78

no-sweat................... 53-47, +96

NYU_KID....................52-46, +91

Yorak........................ 42-18, +61

XT............................. 31-15, +42

dj6ross...................... 23-19, +37

At the halfway point of the season everyone is running at the same pace +/- a few games compared to last year :)

Week 9 schedule:

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle

Edited by Toastyone

Without running the risk of sounding like a complete idiot :)

...here goes anyway...

What are the +'s for? something to do with point predictions? I'm curious as to what my +78 is for and if it's any good :D

Cheers fellas and keep up the good picking, someone will be a deserving winner this year, it's tight at the top!

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 30

Two upsets- Cleveland over San Diego, San Fransisco over Minnesota

zing!

Without running the risk of sounding like a complete idiot :)

...here goes anyway...

What are the +'s for? something to do with point predictions? I'm curious as to what my +78 is for and if it's any good :D

Cheers fellas and keep up the good picking, someone will be a deserving winner this year, it's tight at the top!

Yeah it is the number of points you have been off the Monday night game...it is for tiebreakers when two people have the same record.....It helps to have as low a + score as possible...Like in the overall standings Boog is tied with yisman, but yisman is ahead since he has 107 and boog has 108 ;) Hope that helps

I was being sarcastic...saying 'apparently three threads is trying' since you stated you weren't trying, and yet, there was another thread baiting the person (with a wink). Try to keep up. :)

I wasn't "baiting" the person (unlike what you are trying to do with your "Try to keep up" statement). I wanted to see their reaction to Romo's playing. How is that being rude about it?

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 29

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 25(no starting QB :) raiders can do it)

Week 9 schedule:

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle 35

I'll show some love to the 'skins even if you guys wont :p

Week 9:

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington I'm with you Greeno :)

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago Do they ever play a hard team?

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh If the Raiders can do it...

Indianapolis at New England I hate the Colts!! :laugh:

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 37

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 32

WEEK 9

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle - 38

Week 9 schedule:

Sunday, Nov. 5

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Monday, Nov. 6

Oakland at Seattle 35

I'll show some love to the 'skins even if you guys wont :p

I'd like to change to :-

Indianapolis at New England

thx

Atlanta at Detroit

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Dallas at Washington

Green Bay at Buffalo

Houston at N.Y. Giants

Kansas City at St. Louis

Miami at Chicago

New Orleans at Tampa Bay

Tennessee at Jacksonville

Minnesota at San Francisco

Cleveland at San Diego

Denver at Pittsburgh

Indianapolis at New England

Oakland at Seattle - 34 Points

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!