Neowin.net Xbox Community Leaderboards


Recommended Posts

with that panda on your gamertag you should be the first one to take the podium..."hi, my name is Mathachew and i played Kung Fu Panda" :jump:

LOL, am I the only one here who played King Kong for a quick and easy 1000? :blush:

LOL, am I the only one here who played King Kong for a quick and easy 1000? :blush:

A resounding no: http://www.mygamercard.net/clboard.php?id=...mp;x=97&y=6

Even worse: http://www.mygamercard.net/clboard.php?id=...p;x=44&y=11 (I'm on the list)

welcome back at any rate, jonny. and congratulations on the 20K jianbing, it's about time!

i know COD4 can be poison to gamerscores...it's very addictive. but i'm somewhat tired of the cheating and totally biased game mechanics. every match dominated by one 5:1 player...that gets old after a while.

I want to note I'm about to hit that beautiful 4,000GS mark. I'm very happy to announce it should happen within the next 48 hours due to Gears of War 2 campaign and I still haven't been added to the leaderboard. :(

welcome back at any rate, jonny. and congratulations on the 20K jianbing, it's about time!

i know COD4 can be poison to gamerscores...it's very addictive. but i'm somewhat tired of the cheating and totally biased game mechanics. every match dominated by one 5:1 player...that gets old after a while.

Cheating? I've never seen any cheating on COD4?!?!?

Working my way through COD WAW on veteran. It's pretty brutal. Every checkpoint is hard fought.

there's quite a lot of aimboting and wallhacking going on in COD4 on the 360, but by no means is that the majority of people. the less said about it the better - you don't want to dignify those juvenile idiots.

i agree with you on WaW, the single player was better and longer than COD4, but the MP is pretty bad. it's even more skewed than COD4, which is already quite annoying with its random favoring of certain connection types and poor hit detection. it kills me that one game i'm 24:5, then the next match playing with exactly the same people it's like i'm shooting blanks, end at 5:9 or something, plus it's the same guy shooting me time and again - typically near spawn points. for the ultimate online shooter, i still say DF2.

Drown the City (hard getting used to calling you that...), you need to PM PabUK. he's probably on his "hols", you know how those lazy Europeans get around summer time... :fun:

there's quite a lot of aimboting and wallhacking going on in COD4 on the 360, but by no means is that the majority of people. the less said about it the better - you don't want to dignify those juvenile idiots.

i agree with you on WaW, the single player was better and longer than COD4, but the MP is pretty bad. it's even more skewed than COD4, which is already quite annoying with its random favoring of certain connection types and poor hit detection. it kills me that one game i'm 24:5, then the next match playing with exactly the same people it's like i'm shooting blanks, end at 5:9 or something, plus it's the same guy shooting me time and again - typically near spawn points. for the ultimate online shooter, i still say DF2.

Drown the City (hard getting used to calling you that...), you need to PM PabUK. he's probably on his "hols", you know how those lazy Europeans get around summer time... :fun:

That's news to me. I didn't think cheating was possible on 360. That's one of the things I loved about it over PC. Lame.

I preferred COD4's single to WAW. The story was just better, and I felt the levels/gameplay was more varied. WAW was still very good though.

Your description of COD4 pretty much describes every online shooter ever made :p

I just beat WAW on veteran. Got a cool 800+ points from it. It was stupid hard, but an awesome challenge. I was swearing and yelling at it every few minutes, lol.

hats off to you for doing that, on veteran those games are just silly hard. by the 100th grenade tossed my way, which was like five minutes into the campaign, i was "**** it".

btw i reiterate that my introduction to serious online FPSing was DF2, the first shooter i really got into. let me tell you they broke the mold after that one, they haven't made them like that. however, come to think of it Bad Company was pretty well balanced, more so than the COD games.

i agree with you on WaW, the single player was better and longer than COD4

No freaking way did you say that. CoD4 had one of the best FPS single player campaigns I've ever played. It was epic, emotional, powerful and intense as hell. W@W was just the same recycled BS as every other WWII game ever made.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol. The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!