Recommended Posts

Low & behold, the YouTube trailer here.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZqzL7Fc1gqM

** Warning **

Cam quality is pretty bad

I haven't seen it myself. Waiting for the HD version. Hopefully soon.

Yea I am going to wait too. It will officially be out this Sunday at:

http://www.whysoserious.com/happytrails/

Can someone explain what this Harvey Dent and President thing is?

Harvey Dent is the District Attorney of Gotham City. You can read all about his character on Wikipedia.

Good news: The new Dark Knight trailer is very, very good. Bad news: You have to wait until Sunday to see it (officially).

As many of you will know, last night a global treasure hunt was held that led those who took part to cinemas where the new Dark Knight trailer was shown. We followed the trail of the London one and while there's not a huge amount to report 'from the ground', the sight of tens of Batman fans with faces painted in Joker slap was a bizarre one ? if rendered less frightening than it might have been by the giddy grins of the dashing throngs ? and the screening took place at Odeon Leicester Square. One fan was, slightly bizarrely, given the trailer film reel once the screen had faded to black. What he's supposed to do with this, we don't know. Are Warner Bros stealthily encouraging people to get the trailer on the web? Poor quality bootlegs are already showing up.

Unfortunately for those who weren't able to take part, the trailer won't be released officially until Sunday. It'll be at this site then. The delayed release seems to have been greeted with some displeasure by fans and is the one mis-step so far in this incredibly slick campaign.

Last night's treasure hunt required some fans to stay by their computers to relay clues to those running around town. Those who did that part of the task were rewarded with an extra five days of their friends bragging about seeing the trailer early. The expected release of the trailer once all the treasure hunts were over, which happened by the early hours of this morning, might have been a more popular solution and kinder on those who did half the work.

So, sorry, there are still a few more days until you can see the trailer in the kind of quality you would want. But what you see will be worth it. To describe it fully would spoil your enjoyment, but this is, again, all about The Joker, with Harvey Dent being brought in gradually and judiciously, and the Clown Prince of Crime is looking very bad in a very, very good way.

This Sunday then if you want to wait till official version.

This movie has some of the best movie posters I have seen in many years, I agree that some are looking very artificial, but the rest are just great pieces.

Hey sanctified what do you think of Chris Nolan?

I was talking to a friend who has a big interest in photography and he says Nolan is a very poor visual storyteller. I can't really grasp what he means but he had this to say

Now, the man sure does make very well constructed movies, but does anyone else think that visually, his movies have a horribly clumsy feeling? I'm not talking about the lighting or the 'look' of the movie, but the intangible feel and flow that is made up of shot composition, camera movement and editing. Compare a Spielberg film to a Nolan film and you'll get the gist of what I'm saying.

I'm not talking about individual shots and moments, its the overall feel of the film made up of those elements mentioned. Nolan's films have a laborious and clunky feel to them (in a not good way), Spielberg's (for the sake of this comparison) glide along with a distinctive silky smoothness.

I think Nolan is a talented actors director, but a poor visual director. In a way, Nolan is something of the reverse of post-American Graffiti George Lucas. I doubt its got anything to do with the technical team, it does seem to be more of an innate thing. Its the command of the film language as a medium, the intangible quality which makes a film filmic. Sergio Leone was probably the greatest exponent of this quality. All the great directors possess this x-factor (but not all directors who have this x-factor are great) and its always clear to see no matter the circumstances. Its the overall visual vibe we are talking about. His movies (to me and some people I know at least) do not have what I can best term as a visual rhythm, a pulse.

Now I know you dislike spielberg, but let's leave that out for a moment. :D He also says Nolan is an average action director, this which I agree, based on what we saw in Begins. The action was never a highlight of that film. It just wasn't executed well.

Hey sanctified what do you think of Chris Nolan?

I was talking to a friend who has a big interest in photography and he says Nolan is a very poor visual storyteller. I can't really grasp what he means but he had this to say

Now I know you dislike spielberg, but let's leave that out for a moment. :D He also says Nolan is an average action director, this which I agree, based on what we saw in Begins. The action was never a highlight of that film. It just wasn't executed well.

I disagree. You cant seriosly say that Nolan visual narrative its weak after seeing movies like Memento and the Prestige, but I can quite understand what your friend its saying:

Spielberg has a great grasp of aesthetics, visual rethoric and most importantly, what the hollywood public wants, that is why he is so economically succesful but since both directors are heading in almost opposite directions about what they intent to do i think that your friend its comparing apples with oranges. Nolan`s visual narrative its intended to be primitive, minimalistic, sometimes almost at "Dogma 95" or Woody Allen levels, a clear example of that its the Memento black and white scenes.

That changed with Batman where the technique used was a little more conventional but not worse and his craftmanship really helps. I do get what Nolan tried to do with those ultra fast and blurry actions scenes in Batman Begins: A fight its fast, furious and ususally you get confused, all its just a quick blur, maybe his error its that he used visual methods that where more appropriate in an artistic film than in an action movie intended for hollywood, tipically an action director tries to glorify the violent parts of the movie creating a frieworks show rather than a plausible scenario. That its not necessarily bad, after all if that was the director?s original vision then its his prerogative, the downside its that the hollywood public its too used to this kind of action style that anything different will be questioned.

But then we got The Prestige, where the hybrid matured evidently. I dont know what your friend expected but the visuals worked as far as the plot allowed and in my opinion that is the true way to go, visuals can never be more important than the plot (something that Spielberg has done in the past) because visuals are just a narrative tool, not the story itself nor the movie itself (and when this happens, well, we got most hollywood movies, no substance).

I would invite your friend to watch both Noland and Spielberg movies with a critic eye. I know my dislike for most Spielberg works its quite known here, but I trully enjoy some of his movies, I truly do, he has some great sunday afternoon flicks that I can truly enjoy with a popcorn bag, something I cant do with Nolan since his films require attention to detail.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!