Recommended Posts

I can't believe Aaron Eckhart was casted for this movie. That guy is by far the worst actor I have ever seen. He was terrible in The Core, The Black Dahlia Murder, and Suspect zero. I'll admit he was pretty funny in Frasier, for the 2 episodes he was on. But I really hope he steps it up for The Dark Knight. The cast doesn't look too promising, I just hope it's alot better than what I see happening.

I can't believe Aaron Eckhart was casted for this movie. That guy is by far the worst actor I have ever seen. He was terrible in The Core, The Black Dahlia Murder, and Suspect zero. I'll admit he was pretty funny in Frasier, for the 2 episodes he was on. But I really hope he steps it up for The Dark Knight. The cast doesn't look too promising, I just hope it's alot better than what I see happening.

He was awesome in Thank you for smoking, so if he shows up anything like and with that stye Harvey Dent will be perfect.

Woah, I absolutely LOVED Batman Begins. Still one of the best movies ever in my humble opinion...

Didn't even know there was going to be a sequel. Will Christian Bale still be playing Bruce Wayne?

I agree 100%! It's high time we had creative REAL comic book fans making these movies. Look at the Spiderman films. Sam Raimi was already one of my favorite director and now he's as high on my respect level as they get.

I hope the next Batman movie continues to brings the Dark Knight back and does not just run him through the ringer as most sequals do.

I hope Bale replays his role, however I think, an I am sure this was intentional, he played a far too immature Bruce. But I guess that may have been Bruce before he became the Batman..... *shrug*

Cheers!

I don't think it matters who is playing who, in the end it will be good as long as they do it like the 1st, same director so hopefully it will be good but i think scientology chick isnt steppin up to the plate..

btw batman begins = ****ing awesome and bale as batman rules I love his attitude, about time we had a more rated r batman then the g rated before lol

Tell me if you guys agree with me on this.

I love the first one, but for some reason it lacks any comic book feel to it. The movie feels too "real". The 1989 version was dark, had a comic book feel to it, but it was corny & really PG rated.

It sounds like you have it all backwards lol. IMO Tim Burtons Batman was quite far from the Comic books, and much to real. Where's Batman Begins is much more in it's own world. I geuss it's just how you see it. Story wise Batman Begins is much more true to the comics.

When will... this be coming out?

I think it's 18th July 08

^^It's probably just a photoshop job, as no pictures have been released of the film.

I think all you need to read the "Dark Knight" comic book before comment about Batman movies.

Batman begins is the first movie, now we will have a great history and ambience.

Nolan will rock again, just wait and see.

Yea i agree, Nolan also said that he will be using Alan Moores comic The Killing Joke (which is about the origin of the Joker) as inspiration for the story, as well as looking at some of the older comics.

Edited by acies
Hollywood :rolleyes:

A sequel to a prequel :rolleyes:

Gotta flog it, dont they...

What does that even mean?

Batman Begins isn't a prequel to anything. It's a complete reboot to the franchise. You want to talk about flogging the Batman franchise, talk to Joel "nipples on the batsuit" Schumacher. He's the one that beat the series into the ground. Although if it weren't for him, Nolan may never have decided to do the reboot.

Is the Dark Knight series the one done by Miller? If so that is hardly indicative of what batman is supposed to be like, as Batman is old, robin is a girl and he tries to kill superman.

One of Batman's monikers is "The Dark Knight". I'm pretty sure that was the case even before Miller wrote "The Dark Knight Returns". While the storyline isn't considered "canon", his take on Batman pretty much set the tone for all future Batman stories.

This movie isn't going to be based on Miller's work, it's just using the "Dark Knight" name.

Was batman begins not set before the original batman??

Personally i thought it was the best of all the movies but...hmmm...im afraid they will wear out the fun of it....

Burton's Batman and Nolan's Batman Begins don't take place in the same "universe". In the continuity of Batman Begins, the events of Batman will never happen.

It's like saying that Batman Begins takes place before the events of the campy 60's TV series.

This is a completely new story.

I think all you need to read the "Dark Knight" comic book before comment about Batman movies.

Batman begins is the first movie, now we will have a great history and ambience.

Nolan will rock again, just wait and see.

One of Batman's monikers is "The Dark Knight". I'm pretty sure that was the case even before Miller wrote "The Dark Knight Returns". While the storyline isn't considered "canon", his take on Batman pretty much set the tone for all future Batman stories.

This movie isn't going to be based on Miller's work, it's just using the "Dark Knight" name.

Burton's Batman and Nolan's Batman Begins don't take place in the same "universe". In the continuity of Batman Begins, the events of Batman will never happen.

It's like saying that Batman Begins takes place before the events of the campy 60's TV series.

This is a completely new story.

I completely realize what you said in your post. My post was saying that, assuming the first poster quoted was talking about the miller series it was hardly indicative of what batman is all about. I was meaning that one should read hte Miller comics before talking about the movies. That aside I am not a big batman comic fan, although I did enjoy the burton movies and loved nolans take on the series.

It sounds like you have it all backwards lol. IMO Tim Burtons Batman was quite far from the Comic books, and much to real. Where's Batman Begins is much more in it's own world. I geuss it's just how you see it. Story wise Batman Begins is much more true to the comics.

I think it's 18th July 08

I didn't like Burtons Batmam, but for one exception: Catwoman! :heart:

Just in case of confusion: Frank Millers book was called The Dark Knight Returns, the new movie will be called The Dark Knight, they won't be the same. ;)

Was batman begins not set before the original batman??

Personally i thought it was the best of all the movies but...hmmm...im afraid they will wear out the fun of it....

if you watch both Batman Begins and Butons Batman, you'll see that the story is quite different and wouldn't work if it was a prequal. For one thing Batman can actually fight in batmanbegins :yes:

Just in case of confusion: Frank Millers book was called The Dark Knight Returns, the new movie will be called The Dark Knight, they won't be the same. ;)

if you watch both Batman Begins and Butons Batman, you'll see that the story is quite different and wouldn't work if it was a prequal. For one thing Batman can actually fight in batmanbegins :yes:

And turn his neck!!

Hey

i loved batman begins, but nobody, I mean nobody can replace Jack as the Joker

"Seem like i got a bat in my belfry"

Jack Nicholson AKA The Joker

I think you need to look at it from a different point of view. If Nolan is to be believed (and considering his track record I think you can believe him) the "joker" in the new films will be vastly different from the one Jack played in the older series. So you really can't look at it as someone trying to emulate his work as joker.

Also as others have said, this is a completely different series from the Tim Burton film. In this series those films never happened, and I definitely prefer Batman Begins to the original Batman film.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      557
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!