Is rugby a game for the uncivilised?


Recommended Posts

I was watching a program on network tv last nite called "Trading spouses"

Its a US show where they swap wives for a week.

In this episode one american and one english woman living in san fran were swapped.

The american woman was at a rugby game and was discusted with it, saying it was a game that was completely uncivilised! and not a game for "gentlemen"

Mind you she also thought Paintballing was the unnecessary use of violence and weapons.. :|

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/502834-is-rugby-a-game-for-the-uncivilised/
Share on other sites

The comment may possibly be made about the _fans_ of any sport. Football, Soccer, Nascar, Rugby, Hockey. They all have civilised and uncivilised fans alike.

The professional _players_ however, would tend to be more civilised. The dedication and training needed would only be achievable by civilised people in most cases.

If you're talking about Sunday League and non-pro, then yes, any old bloke, of any manner could play.

You (the woman) can't make a generalisation like that with sport, races, religion, anything.... that's just ignorant.

There are sports where the fans and players are more civilised, such as croquet, polo etc... but those are traditionally upperclass pastimes.

There are two types of rugby (League/Union) I played the former for my university and it is a very tough sport. I disagree with the opinion of the woman. The game is one of the most physical that you can play but it is a constructive sport as any other.

I think that woman probably knows nothing about rugby. If you don't know the rules of a sport, you'll probably think it looks like a random scramble of people rushing about bashing each other.

I always got the impression that rugby was a tough sport, but also rather middle class.

I do not think it is for the 'uncivilised'. Those who are uncivilised don't spend their time playing sports, which entails discipline and following rules.

Its anything but, you have to show more respect for players and referees than in some games such as football (soccer).

The referee has to be referred to as Sir/Miss and voices can't be raised and swearing results in heavy penalties

Correct, and you hardly ever see any of the theatrics that you see in football even though there is a hell of a lot more contact in Rugby.

Also: Rugby is actually a very complicated game, there are so many rules and regulations it takes forever to fully understand the ins and outs of the game.

I personally find playing rugby far more fun than football, but that may be because I suck at football :)

Yeah, rugby is a game for the uncivilized to a certain extent but then again so is hockey. Often the team is filled with plumbers and construction workers who drive macho cars and get ridiculously drunk after games, find women that are attending with their boyfriend and then proceed to hit on the girl in an attempt to start a bar fight. I played for rugby for one season and hockey for several.

I mean, it isn't exactly a day at the country club but so what.

Personally, I think that "Trading Spouses" isn't the most civilized concept in the world either.

[Thread Moved from GD to the Sporting Arena]

Is rugby a game for the uncivilised?

Not in the slightest. There's a lot happening (so many rules) and so much contact that you can't be uncivil. As already mentioned, there's no theatrics in rugby like with football - people don't go down like they've been shot, roll around, then get up with a fake limp. They just get on with it.

Often the team is filled with plumbers and construction workers who drive macho cars and get ridiculously drunk after games

In dublin, they are real pretentious pompus asses that play the game, they consist of "upperclass" people.

In the south of the republic, Limerick and cork, mainly regular middle class people play the game. Munster are the team from this area. European champs

76425image.jpg

i reckon it depends on where u come from that depends on who plays the game. I now in america they gernerally are failed American football players that think BIG is good..Couldnt be more wrong

You can hardly call it uncivillised. The ref is in control of matches and as soon as someone does something bad they are other sent off for a few mins or taken straight off.

To me it's a great game. just look at the crowds it's a mixture. And if i remember at most natioanl matchs you can drink. were as football you can't drink and watch the game at the same time.

Infact you will probley find pro rugby players are smart. Most of them went to uni and have some even have judges as parents.

So i think it's a fair game where players know where they stand with the ref.

The comment may possibly be made about the _fans_ of any sport. Football, Soccer, Nascar, Rugby, Hockey. They all have civilised and uncivilised fans alike.

The professional _players_ however, would tend to be more civilised. The dedication and training needed would only be achievable by civilised people in most cases.

If you're talking about Sunday League and non-pro, then yes, any old bloke, of any manner could play.

You (the woman) can't make a generalisation like that with sport, races, religion, anything.... that's just ignorant.

There are sports where the fans and players are more civilised, such as croquet, polo etc... but those are traditionally upperclass pastimes.

Rugby union and Rugby league fans are always well behaved, rarely if ever is there trouble at games!

In dublin, they are real pretentious pompus asses that play the game, they consist of "upperclass" people.

In the south of the republic, Limerick and cork, mainly regular middle class people play the game. Munster are the team from this area. European champs

76425image.jpg

i reckon it depends on where u come from that depends on who plays the game. I now in america they gernerally are failed American football players that think BIG is good..Couldnt be more wrong

Rugby is played by people of all walks of life. As for American (Rugby USA) rugby, it is building a proud tradition and is not only played by people who are "failed American Football Players!" The Army Rugby Team was founded in 1961 and for over 40 years has been a leader in USA Collegiate Rugby. The Army Ruggers are West Point?s most winning team. The USA National side (The Test Side!) have qualified for the Rugby World Cup 2007 and I am sure that they will not disgrace themselves at all! The top sides like New Zeeland, South Africa, Australia, France, and England are expected to beat sides like the USA pretty comfortably but I am sure that they will give a good account of themselves!

In France its a game played by "Hard Men"

I don't think those two words go together. The European players are usually the softer ones, look at the whole situation with that Irish ****** at the Lions Tour for a prime example. If you want a "hard man" look up Buck Shelford.

The referee has to be referred to as Sir/Miss and voices can't be raised and swearing results in heavy penalties
WTF? You can't abuse/insult the ref but the rest is untrue.

Rugby is a sport played by real men

Football is played by boys who think they are men

Amerikan Football is played by pansies

Couldn't have put it better myself.

It is a our national game and the All Blacks are pretty much our national heroes so it is the most popular sport and we are also the most successful nation even though we only have a population of 4 million.

Edited by Michael_C

I have played games where swearing has resulted in a penalty to the opposition.

If you listen to interviews from international players you will all see that they are all intelligent people and unlike football when they are on the ground and dont get up it really does mean they are hurt but the thing you dont see is them rolling around in 'agony'

On the pitch and off the pitch players all have huge amounts of respect for each other and whilst fights do occasionally happen at the end of the game they shake hands and just forget about it.

I would certainly say that is is not for the uncivilised at all but rather the opposite

situation with that Irish ****** at the Lions Tour for a prime example. If you want a "hard man" look up Buck Shelford.

you refer to the illegal spear tackle that could have broke his neck?

The top sides like New Zeeland, South Africa, Australia, France, and England are expected to beat sides like the USA pretty comfortably but I am sure that they will give a good account of themselves!

we (ireland) put 60 or 70 poinyts over on them at one stage, we beat them with our developmental squad too...

It is a our national game and the All Blacks are pretty much our national heroes so it is the most popular sport and we are also the most successful nation even though we only have a population of 4 million..

you rob the best of the south pacific players too, so its a little more than a pool of 4 million.

Is rugby a game for the uncivilised? No more so than any other sport I would imagine. All sports, when you think about it, promote what could be considered slightly neanderthal attitudes. "I'm going to beat you because I'm the better/stronger/smarter individual" type of notion.

So yes, in that context, rugby is a sport for the uncivilised. So is football, golf, tennis, show-jumping, chess.........

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      260
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!