First Halo 3 multiplayer screens from Swedish Mag


Recommended Posts

What if you could save your own movies from Halo 3's single- and multiplayer gameplay and then rewatch them? In Halo 3, you can.

http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3154702

It's on now! Montages galore!

Now that is awesome! I bought a TV-Card just so I can do that with Halo 2 but it wasn't very good quality and I ended up not really using it. Having it built into the game is a great addition! I just hope they have an easy way of sharing this with others online :yes: :D

http://translate.google.com/translate?u=ht...Flanguage_tools

With no offense to any Halo fanboys here, after seeing these scans of the magazine, I'm not too impressed with the graphics. They don't look like a big improvement over Halo 2 or Halo. I know it's still early and I'm sure there's placeholders, just stating.

"How can you say this is going to be amazing? All of that is pre-rendered! Nothing of that is in-game, they havent got a HUD! All it is is images that Bungie have put together to get us thinking how amazing it is!"

If this was the Sony forum and was a PS3 game, this thread would be full of replies like this from the M$ fanboys. Makes me laugh at how all you M$ bumsucks can actually bum aload of pre-rendered stuff when its a 360 game and totally contradict yourself when a PS3 game releases images of this sort.

I would quote lots of people here, but tbh I dont want to waste my time and also there would be too many to fit in this post!

But any way, as a 360 owner, I have no comment as again they are only renders, I will comment when I see someone playing the game before I comment on how amazing or crap it looks.

Any how, I will all you M$ fanboys in here to continue ejaculating over some PRE-RENDERED images and trolling in the Sony forum.

I love being neutral to both M$ and Sony as I can take the mik wen due, and the mik is due here for all you M$ boys loving this scans.

Chow.

"How can you say this is going to be amazing? All of that is pre-rendered! Nothing of that is in-game, they havent got a HUD! All it is is images that Bungie have put together to get us thinking how amazing it is!"

If this was the Sony forum and was a PS3 game, this thread would be full of replies like this from the M$ fanboys. Makes me laugh at how all you M$ bumsucks can actually bum aload of pre-rendered stuff when its a 360 game and totally contradict yourself when a PS3 game releases images of this sort.

I would quote lots of people here, but tbh I dont want to waste my time and also there would be too many to fit in this post!

But any way, as a 360 owner, I have no comment as again they are only renders, I will comment when I see someone playing the game before I comment on how amazing or crap it looks.

Any how, I will all you M$ fanboys in here to continue ejaculating over some PRE-RENDERED images and trolling in the Sony forum.

I love being neutral to both M$ and Sony as I can take the mik wen due, and the mik is due here for all you M$ boys loving this scans.

Chow.

I'll quote you when we're playing :) Oh, and you're neutral, but you say 'M$' like a 14 year old Sony fanboy,

Edit: bolded a prime example of your childishness.

I'll quote you when we're playing :) Oh, and you're neutral, but you use 'M$' like a 14 year old Sony fanboy.

ha Shetland, the thing is I quote M$ coz its funny. I own a 360, I am playing PES6 on my 360 at the moment. So I aint no Sony fanboy, I dont troll this forum, I havent trolled about this game, I would love for it to look like this, but I don't know why all you lot are gettin all so excited. Its just some scans, hell you guys trolled the hell out of everything PS3 that were scans or pre rendered, but come something 360 and its the f**king bomb, its gonna rock, its going to be the best god damn mutha f**king game ever.

Sorry dude, it annoys me how people are such gays about things like this and contradict themselves time and time again.

And also as for being a 14 year old Sony fanboy, I'm not the one claiming to have came over some scans from a swedish gaming magazine, now that must make 3/4's of the population of this xbox forum 11 year old microsoft nerds who have yet to have met women.

Jog On Son.

EDIT: OMG you have brought out the bold, dude get a life. You are all bumsucks, seriously, you don't see me getting all like this over PS3 scans or 360 scans so you can call me a fan boy at all. I was just stating what you lot are and it's really pathetic.

Scazza, while I agree with you that 360 fanboys would be saying how screens of PS3 games were prerendered, I don't think these screenshots are prerendered at all. Just because there is no HUD does not mean these are prerendered. It's common practice in the gaming industry to take more "cinematic" screenshots and leave out the HUD in early screens. The developers have programs that allow them to pause the game, remove any HUD material, and take screens of action shots that will look better than just taking one straight.

Whatever the reason for your attitude is Scazza, it's not on. I don't know why you're so adamant this is all pre-rendered, except for the concept art, it looks well within the limits of what we've seen the 360 do so far and I would bet money on it looking amazing by launch. For me at least, the Halo franchise has never been the best looking of games anyway.

"How can you say this is going to be amazing? All of that is pre-rendered! Nothing of that is in-game, they havent got a HUD! All it is is images that Bungie have put together to get us thinking how amazing it is!"

If this was the Sony forum and was a PS3 game, this thread would be full of replies like this from the M$ fanboys. Makes me laugh at how all you M$ bumsucks can actually bum aload of pre-rendered stuff when its a 360 game and totally contradict yourself when a PS3 game releases images of this sort.

:laugh: :rofl: Another "$ony" fanboy calling himself neutral. It just doesn't get any better than that.

It's not pre-rendered stuff, guys. We saw the E3 trailer, and that was in game. This doesn't even look as good, in my opinion (all the maps are in the alpha stages, so that's totally expected; the E3 trailer level was polished to look good and awe-inspire). Are you going to say the promotional ad for Gears of War was pre-rendered too?

Edit: Scazza, just stop posting before you embarrass yourself even more. You're doing a great job now.

"These magazines are copyrighted material and are available to their subscribers and people who purchase the magazine. Scanning images, posting those images, scanning or posting transcriptions of the articles is a violation of the magazine's copyright and ownership of the material." - Bungie

to be honest it doesnt look that good, i mean look at the high res scans, it looks empty and definatly needs weather conditions or something. For example, check this screenshot out(http://tourfilms.com/h3scans/Halo3-3.JPG)... flat terrain, horrible textures... its garbage. Good thing its alpha :)

and yea, i know you will tell me its ALPHA, but whats the point of releasing these screenshots when they are not looking that good. ehh i guess Halo fans will love it either way.

"These magazines are copyrighted material and are available to their subscribers and people who purchase the magazine. Scanning images, posting those images, scanning or posting transcriptions of the articles is a violation of the magazine's copyright and ownership of the material." - Bungie

Well, you're never technically supposed to scan from a magazine. It's always copyrighted material. Common practice anyway.

DiEMOS, they released the screenshots to show that what's going on in Bungie headquarters. I don't really find the screenshots the best part. It's mostly the new weapons, vehicles, and gameplay mechanics that get me excited. That's not to say the final build of Halo 3 won't look absolutely amazing. Just look at Gears of War now.

Scazza, while I agree with you that 360 fanboys would be saying how screens of PS3 games were prerendered, I don't think these screenshots are prerendered at all. Just because there is no HUD does not mean these are prerendered. It's common practice in the gaming industry to take more "cinematic" screenshots and leave out the HUD in early screens. The developers have programs that allow them to pause the game, remove any HUD material, and take screens of action shots that will look better than just taking one straight.

Ayepecks, thats fair kop there mate, but as most people say, until you can see a HUD and someone playing it, you have to take these images with a pinch of salt until you do actually see them on a TV screen with some dude with a 360 controller in his hand kick some ass with a plasma gun.

Until that time, I'm gonna say, Yea those scans do look nice but I'm not gonna get all excited and change my underwear over it. Tbh I would never have to change my underwear over a game, but I do get hyped about certain games when they start coming together and looking good. No doub in my mind this game will kick ass, but it's the fact that you have all these people in here saying how amazing it looks and how amazing it's going to be JUST because its a 360 game.

Now if this was being produced on the PS3 and this exact topic was posting in the Sony Forum, you would have your usual trolls, trolling away at how they are just scans, just pre-rendered images, the fact that there is no HUD all because it is on a PS3 and not a 360.

It just gets to me because I love gaming and hate it when people take sides, coz im not one of them, Im gonna be buying all 3 Next Gen consoles and I cant wait to be playing Halo 3 on the 360, MGS4 on the PS3 and having fun lookin like an idiot waving my Wii Wand around. I wish everyone could be like this and not troll all the time.

^^^Except we know from the BWU that these guys actually played the game, and got the shots from the game. So they did have the controllers in their hand, and played all this stuff. Then they're like, "oh, I want a screenshot here," and accessed the debug menu and took off the HUD and snapped a pic.

-Spenser

Until that time, I'm gonna say, Yea those scans do look nice but I'm not gonna get all excited and change my underwear over it. Tbh I would never have to change my underwear over a game, but I do get hyped about certain games when they start coming together and looking good. No doub in my mind this game will kick ass, but it's the fact that you have all these people in here saying how amazing it looks and how amazing it's going to be JUST because its a 360 game.

Not true. Plenty of us acknowledge some PS3 games look good. I think Resistance looks pretty good. Not so much MGS4, but that's because of the horrendous environmental textures in the last screenshots we saw (worse than these alpha build textures of Halo 3).

This game looks amazing because it looks amazing; not because it's on the 360. That game is about the cowgirl with the zombies looks horrible. I acknowledge that, and it's a 360 game.

:laugh: :rofl: Another "$ony" fanboy calling himself neutral. It just doesn't get any better than that.

It's not pre-rendered stuff, guys. We saw the E3 trailer, and that was in game. This doesn't even look as good, in my opinion (all the maps are in the alpha stages, so that's totally expected; the E3 trailer level was polished to look good and awe-inspire). Are you going to say the promotional ad for Gears of War was pre-rendered too?

Edit: Scazza, just stop posting before you embarrass yourself even more. You're doing a great job now.

Embarrasing myself? Ok I'm not the one saying that I need to change my pants coz I just came over some scans of a game now am I. I am just stating an opinion, and thats what goes on in the Sony forum all the time by you guys and what is with all the Alpha excuses? I don;t care if it's in alpha stage, I don't care at all.

As for GoW I can;t wait for that it's going to kick ass and looks fantastic, and I can say that truthfully coz I have seen it in action, people playing so I know that it's real.

If I was a fanboy I wouldn't be saying things like that now would I, hell I wouldn't of owned an Xbox and own a 360. So don't brand me as a fanboy when I'm not. All I have is an opinion about the majority of the Xbox Forum users who fail to see anything else good if it doesn't have the numbers 360 slapped on it.

"These magazines are copyrighted material and are available to their subscribers and people who purchase the magazine. Scanning images, posting those images, scanning or posting transcriptions of the articles is a violation of the magazine's copyright and ownership of the material." - Bungie

Right. So does this thread not break rules?

Scazza, while I agree with you that 360 fanboys would be saying how screens of PS3 games were prerendered, I don't think these screenshots are prerendered at all. Just because there is no HUD does not mean these are prerendered. It's common practice in the gaming industry to take more "cinematic" screenshots and leave out the HUD in early screens. The developers have programs that allow them to pause the game, remove any HUD material, and take screens of action shots that will look better than just taking one straight.

Not just cinematic shots...

post-18268-1161985157.png

taken from Neogaf.

I'd say it's quite a difference give or take a few for an alpha game with placeholder texture/weather/other effects off. Not to mention we're judging this on ugly magazine scans.

562116_20041105_screen040.jpg

h313wg0.jpg

You know Halo 2 doesn't look this good.

MC has a lot more detail:

halo33uu6.png

Looks better than Coagulation:

halo31nm6.png

Midship isn't near the quality of this(the magazine seemed to photoshop the warthog in this pic btw):

halo39tg6.png

Most important of all, these will be rendered in 720p/1080i(p). It's by far the largest difference between Halo 2's 480p.

I'll quote you when we're playing :) Oh, and you're neutral, but you say 'M$' like a 14 year old Sony fanboy,

Edit: bolded a prime example of your childishness.

While he is clearly acting like a fanboy. So are you. Even when you posted the pics you said "For any anti-xbox360 fanboys" like anyone who is disappointed in the pics is either a newbie or a fanboy.

Edited by MadFerIt2006
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!