First Halo 3 multiplayer screens from Swedish Mag


Recommended Posts

What if you could save your own movies from Halo 3's single- and multiplayer gameplay and then rewatch them? In Halo 3, you can.

http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3154702

It's on now! Montages galore!

Now that is awesome! I bought a TV-Card just so I can do that with Halo 2 but it wasn't very good quality and I ended up not really using it. Having it built into the game is a great addition! I just hope they have an easy way of sharing this with others online :yes: :D

http://translate.google.com/translate?u=ht...Flanguage_tools

With no offense to any Halo fanboys here, after seeing these scans of the magazine, I'm not too impressed with the graphics. They don't look like a big improvement over Halo 2 or Halo. I know it's still early and I'm sure there's placeholders, just stating.

"How can you say this is going to be amazing? All of that is pre-rendered! Nothing of that is in-game, they havent got a HUD! All it is is images that Bungie have put together to get us thinking how amazing it is!"

If this was the Sony forum and was a PS3 game, this thread would be full of replies like this from the M$ fanboys. Makes me laugh at how all you M$ bumsucks can actually bum aload of pre-rendered stuff when its a 360 game and totally contradict yourself when a PS3 game releases images of this sort.

I would quote lots of people here, but tbh I dont want to waste my time and also there would be too many to fit in this post!

But any way, as a 360 owner, I have no comment as again they are only renders, I will comment when I see someone playing the game before I comment on how amazing or crap it looks.

Any how, I will all you M$ fanboys in here to continue ejaculating over some PRE-RENDERED images and trolling in the Sony forum.

I love being neutral to both M$ and Sony as I can take the mik wen due, and the mik is due here for all you M$ boys loving this scans.

Chow.

"How can you say this is going to be amazing? All of that is pre-rendered! Nothing of that is in-game, they havent got a HUD! All it is is images that Bungie have put together to get us thinking how amazing it is!"

If this was the Sony forum and was a PS3 game, this thread would be full of replies like this from the M$ fanboys. Makes me laugh at how all you M$ bumsucks can actually bum aload of pre-rendered stuff when its a 360 game and totally contradict yourself when a PS3 game releases images of this sort.

I would quote lots of people here, but tbh I dont want to waste my time and also there would be too many to fit in this post!

But any way, as a 360 owner, I have no comment as again they are only renders, I will comment when I see someone playing the game before I comment on how amazing or crap it looks.

Any how, I will all you M$ fanboys in here to continue ejaculating over some PRE-RENDERED images and trolling in the Sony forum.

I love being neutral to both M$ and Sony as I can take the mik wen due, and the mik is due here for all you M$ boys loving this scans.

Chow.

I'll quote you when we're playing :) Oh, and you're neutral, but you say 'M$' like a 14 year old Sony fanboy,

Edit: bolded a prime example of your childishness.

I'll quote you when we're playing :) Oh, and you're neutral, but you use 'M$' like a 14 year old Sony fanboy.

ha Shetland, the thing is I quote M$ coz its funny. I own a 360, I am playing PES6 on my 360 at the moment. So I aint no Sony fanboy, I dont troll this forum, I havent trolled about this game, I would love for it to look like this, but I don't know why all you lot are gettin all so excited. Its just some scans, hell you guys trolled the hell out of everything PS3 that were scans or pre rendered, but come something 360 and its the f**king bomb, its gonna rock, its going to be the best god damn mutha f**king game ever.

Sorry dude, it annoys me how people are such gays about things like this and contradict themselves time and time again.

And also as for being a 14 year old Sony fanboy, I'm not the one claiming to have came over some scans from a swedish gaming magazine, now that must make 3/4's of the population of this xbox forum 11 year old microsoft nerds who have yet to have met women.

Jog On Son.

EDIT: OMG you have brought out the bold, dude get a life. You are all bumsucks, seriously, you don't see me getting all like this over PS3 scans or 360 scans so you can call me a fan boy at all. I was just stating what you lot are and it's really pathetic.

Scazza, while I agree with you that 360 fanboys would be saying how screens of PS3 games were prerendered, I don't think these screenshots are prerendered at all. Just because there is no HUD does not mean these are prerendered. It's common practice in the gaming industry to take more "cinematic" screenshots and leave out the HUD in early screens. The developers have programs that allow them to pause the game, remove any HUD material, and take screens of action shots that will look better than just taking one straight.

Whatever the reason for your attitude is Scazza, it's not on. I don't know why you're so adamant this is all pre-rendered, except for the concept art, it looks well within the limits of what we've seen the 360 do so far and I would bet money on it looking amazing by launch. For me at least, the Halo franchise has never been the best looking of games anyway.

"How can you say this is going to be amazing? All of that is pre-rendered! Nothing of that is in-game, they havent got a HUD! All it is is images that Bungie have put together to get us thinking how amazing it is!"

If this was the Sony forum and was a PS3 game, this thread would be full of replies like this from the M$ fanboys. Makes me laugh at how all you M$ bumsucks can actually bum aload of pre-rendered stuff when its a 360 game and totally contradict yourself when a PS3 game releases images of this sort.

:laugh: :rofl: Another "$ony" fanboy calling himself neutral. It just doesn't get any better than that.

It's not pre-rendered stuff, guys. We saw the E3 trailer, and that was in game. This doesn't even look as good, in my opinion (all the maps are in the alpha stages, so that's totally expected; the E3 trailer level was polished to look good and awe-inspire). Are you going to say the promotional ad for Gears of War was pre-rendered too?

Edit: Scazza, just stop posting before you embarrass yourself even more. You're doing a great job now.

"These magazines are copyrighted material and are available to their subscribers and people who purchase the magazine. Scanning images, posting those images, scanning or posting transcriptions of the articles is a violation of the magazine's copyright and ownership of the material." - Bungie

to be honest it doesnt look that good, i mean look at the high res scans, it looks empty and definatly needs weather conditions or something. For example, check this screenshot out(http://tourfilms.com/h3scans/Halo3-3.JPG)... flat terrain, horrible textures... its garbage. Good thing its alpha :)

and yea, i know you will tell me its ALPHA, but whats the point of releasing these screenshots when they are not looking that good. ehh i guess Halo fans will love it either way.

"These magazines are copyrighted material and are available to their subscribers and people who purchase the magazine. Scanning images, posting those images, scanning or posting transcriptions of the articles is a violation of the magazine's copyright and ownership of the material." - Bungie

Well, you're never technically supposed to scan from a magazine. It's always copyrighted material. Common practice anyway.

DiEMOS, they released the screenshots to show that what's going on in Bungie headquarters. I don't really find the screenshots the best part. It's mostly the new weapons, vehicles, and gameplay mechanics that get me excited. That's not to say the final build of Halo 3 won't look absolutely amazing. Just look at Gears of War now.

Scazza, while I agree with you that 360 fanboys would be saying how screens of PS3 games were prerendered, I don't think these screenshots are prerendered at all. Just because there is no HUD does not mean these are prerendered. It's common practice in the gaming industry to take more "cinematic" screenshots and leave out the HUD in early screens. The developers have programs that allow them to pause the game, remove any HUD material, and take screens of action shots that will look better than just taking one straight.

Ayepecks, thats fair kop there mate, but as most people say, until you can see a HUD and someone playing it, you have to take these images with a pinch of salt until you do actually see them on a TV screen with some dude with a 360 controller in his hand kick some ass with a plasma gun.

Until that time, I'm gonna say, Yea those scans do look nice but I'm not gonna get all excited and change my underwear over it. Tbh I would never have to change my underwear over a game, but I do get hyped about certain games when they start coming together and looking good. No doub in my mind this game will kick ass, but it's the fact that you have all these people in here saying how amazing it looks and how amazing it's going to be JUST because its a 360 game.

Now if this was being produced on the PS3 and this exact topic was posting in the Sony Forum, you would have your usual trolls, trolling away at how they are just scans, just pre-rendered images, the fact that there is no HUD all because it is on a PS3 and not a 360.

It just gets to me because I love gaming and hate it when people take sides, coz im not one of them, Im gonna be buying all 3 Next Gen consoles and I cant wait to be playing Halo 3 on the 360, MGS4 on the PS3 and having fun lookin like an idiot waving my Wii Wand around. I wish everyone could be like this and not troll all the time.

^^^Except we know from the BWU that these guys actually played the game, and got the shots from the game. So they did have the controllers in their hand, and played all this stuff. Then they're like, "oh, I want a screenshot here," and accessed the debug menu and took off the HUD and snapped a pic.

-Spenser

Until that time, I'm gonna say, Yea those scans do look nice but I'm not gonna get all excited and change my underwear over it. Tbh I would never have to change my underwear over a game, but I do get hyped about certain games when they start coming together and looking good. No doub in my mind this game will kick ass, but it's the fact that you have all these people in here saying how amazing it looks and how amazing it's going to be JUST because its a 360 game.

Not true. Plenty of us acknowledge some PS3 games look good. I think Resistance looks pretty good. Not so much MGS4, but that's because of the horrendous environmental textures in the last screenshots we saw (worse than these alpha build textures of Halo 3).

This game looks amazing because it looks amazing; not because it's on the 360. That game is about the cowgirl with the zombies looks horrible. I acknowledge that, and it's a 360 game.

:laugh: :rofl: Another "$ony" fanboy calling himself neutral. It just doesn't get any better than that.

It's not pre-rendered stuff, guys. We saw the E3 trailer, and that was in game. This doesn't even look as good, in my opinion (all the maps are in the alpha stages, so that's totally expected; the E3 trailer level was polished to look good and awe-inspire). Are you going to say the promotional ad for Gears of War was pre-rendered too?

Edit: Scazza, just stop posting before you embarrass yourself even more. You're doing a great job now.

Embarrasing myself? Ok I'm not the one saying that I need to change my pants coz I just came over some scans of a game now am I. I am just stating an opinion, and thats what goes on in the Sony forum all the time by you guys and what is with all the Alpha excuses? I don;t care if it's in alpha stage, I don't care at all.

As for GoW I can;t wait for that it's going to kick ass and looks fantastic, and I can say that truthfully coz I have seen it in action, people playing so I know that it's real.

If I was a fanboy I wouldn't be saying things like that now would I, hell I wouldn't of owned an Xbox and own a 360. So don't brand me as a fanboy when I'm not. All I have is an opinion about the majority of the Xbox Forum users who fail to see anything else good if it doesn't have the numbers 360 slapped on it.

"These magazines are copyrighted material and are available to their subscribers and people who purchase the magazine. Scanning images, posting those images, scanning or posting transcriptions of the articles is a violation of the magazine's copyright and ownership of the material." - Bungie

Right. So does this thread not break rules?

Scazza, while I agree with you that 360 fanboys would be saying how screens of PS3 games were prerendered, I don't think these screenshots are prerendered at all. Just because there is no HUD does not mean these are prerendered. It's common practice in the gaming industry to take more "cinematic" screenshots and leave out the HUD in early screens. The developers have programs that allow them to pause the game, remove any HUD material, and take screens of action shots that will look better than just taking one straight.

Not just cinematic shots...

post-18268-1161985157.png

taken from Neogaf.

I'd say it's quite a difference give or take a few for an alpha game with placeholder texture/weather/other effects off. Not to mention we're judging this on ugly magazine scans.

562116_20041105_screen040.jpg

h313wg0.jpg

You know Halo 2 doesn't look this good.

MC has a lot more detail:

halo33uu6.png

Looks better than Coagulation:

halo31nm6.png

Midship isn't near the quality of this(the magazine seemed to photoshop the warthog in this pic btw):

halo39tg6.png

Most important of all, these will be rendered in 720p/1080i(p). It's by far the largest difference between Halo 2's 480p.

I'll quote you when we're playing :) Oh, and you're neutral, but you say 'M$' like a 14 year old Sony fanboy,

Edit: bolded a prime example of your childishness.

While he is clearly acting like a fanboy. So are you. Even when you posted the pics you said "For any anti-xbox360 fanboys" like anyone who is disappointed in the pics is either a newbie or a fanboy.

Edited by MadFerIt2006
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!