First Halo 3 multiplayer screens from Swedish Mag


Recommended Posts

^^^ I second the motion. I LOVED Hang 'Em High...

For all those that say these are renders... what makes you honestly think that? They don't even look that 'jaw-dropping' if you ask me. But I know the final game will look damn good, Bungie always delivers... just look at Halo 1 and Halo 2, both arguably the best looking games (graphically) of their time.

EDIT: lawl, looks like Bungie's servers are being overloaded... I can't access their site (bungie.net)

If mgs comes to the xbox360 then I will get one instead of a ps3

I have nothing against the PS3 but $600 for a console its just too much for a third world country citizen like me.

Not just cinematic shots...

Giga, I wasn't saying they were screenshots from cinematics in the game. I was implying that's why they use those camera angles and remove the HUD -- to give them a cinematic look.

taken from Neogaf.

I'd say it's quite a difference give or take a few for an alpha game with placeholder texture/weather/other effects off. Not to mention we're judging this on ugly magazine scans.

562116_20041105_screen040.jpg

h313wg0.jpg

You know Halo 2 doesn't look this good.

MC has a lot more detail:

halo33uu6.png

Looks better than Coagulation:

halo31nm6.png

Midship isn't near the quality of this(the magazine seemed to photoshop the warthog in this pic btw):

halo39tg6.png

Most important of all, these will be rendered in 720p/1080i(p). It's by far the largest difference between Halo 2's 480p.

I knew I shouldn't have said anything to rile the Halo fanboys :rolleyes:

And it's nice of you to use a dated Halo picture (not even from the final build from the looks of it) for comparison.

Giga, I wasn't saying they were screenshots from cinematics in the game. I was implying that's why they use those camera angles and remove the HUD -- to give them a cinematic look.

I knew I shouldn't have said anything to rile the Halo fanboys :rolleyes:

And it's nice of you to use a dated Halo picture (not even from the final build from the looks of it) for comparison.

He was comparing "alpha stage" to "alpha stage". :|

Giga, I wasn't saying they were screenshots from cinematics in the game. I was implying that's why they use those camera angles and remove the HUD -- to give them a cinematic look.

I knew I shouldn't have said anything to rile the Halo fanboys :rolleyes:

And it's nice of you to use a dated Halo picture (not even from the final build from the looks of it) for comparison.

Indirectly calling me a fanboy?

And no, that wasn't a dated shot. Nov 7, 2004. Gamespot: http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/halo2/...dex.html?page=8

And IGN if you want: http://media.xbox.ign.com/media/482/482228/imgs_9.html

halo-2-20041107100411411.jpg

halo-2-20041107100416004.jpg

halo-2-20041107100428910.jpg

halo-2-20041107100459706.jpg

Edited by Giga

no comments here, everytime I say something it seems like a "go for it" signal for some people to go all out hunting Spartans... :rofl: :rofl: :p

so, this time not teasing, no clues, no nothing... just believe what you want to believe... :happy: :yes:

Looking good, can't wait to see some direct-feed screens and videos. Glad to see that the Mongoose is back. :D

Not so much MGS4, but that's because of the horrendous environmental textures in the last screenshots we saw

Placeholder textures.

Looks like theres going to be a lot of Halo 3 content being released next month at 1UP, including single player details.

Giga, I wasn't indirectly calling you a fanboy. I was directly calling you one. I haven't even said anything remotely bad about Halo 3 and you're getting your panties in a knot in the assumption that I'm bad mouthing it. All I said was that it doesn't look like a big leap from Halo 2 graphics thus far, but I acknowledged that it's early and that there are still place holding graphics. Don't get in a tissy about it.

Halo PC: (Since we should really be comparing the PC version to this since the resolutions are more similar than comparing Halo 3 to Halo 1 on XBox)

9910_full.jpg

9885_full.jpg

Halo 2: (linked due to size)

http://sameergul2004.tripod.com/sitebuilde...05100903736.jpg

http://liquid-phantom.tripod.com/sitebuild...iteoverlook.jpg

Halo 3:

See entire thread.

Sorry, but again... I don't see as big of a graphical leap as you would expect from a next-generation console title; especially a next-gen console title that everyone's claiming will have some of the best graphics ever.

magik, please read my post again more clearly: I never said there wasn't a difference. That much is clear. I said it wasn't a drastic difference and that it wasn't as good as you would expect to see from a game of Halo 3's hype. I'm still waiting to see those trailer graphics, bud. Newsflash: just like I said, those won't happen and never will.

magik, please read my post again more clearly: I never said there wasn't a difference. That much is clear. I said it wasn't a drastic difference and that it wasn't as good as you would expect to see from a game of Halo 3's hype. I'm still waiting to see those trailer graphics, bud. Newsflash: just like I said, those won't happen and never will.

So you're willing to 'debunk' the graphics quality of the trailer on an alpha-version of scans of a magazine?

... ah, well, patience is a virtue. Don't worry, I still have our beloved discussion bookmarked. :)

So you're willing to 'debunk' the graphics quality of the trailer on an alpha-version of scans of a magazine?

... ah, well, patience is a virtue. Don't worry, I still have our beloved discussion bookmarked. :)

No, I'm not. I'm just reiterating that graphics of that quality will not occur in Halo 3. I stand by that statement proudly. If those graphics were so possible, why aren't they there right now since they already developed them? Because, as I already said -- the tech demo was missing A.I. and physics. Halo 3 won't look that good. That's a promise.

And you can't honestly tell me you wouldn't have responded the same way if the graphics looked great.

No, I'm not. I'm just reiterating that graphics of that quality will not occur in Halo 3. I stand by that statement proudly. If those graphics were so possible, why aren't they there right now since they already developed them? Because, as I already said -- the tech demo was missing A.I. and physics. Halo 3 won't look that good. That's a promise.

And you can't honestly tell me you wouldn't have responded the same way if the graphics looked great.

I myself said they don't look that great. It's not a secret. It's also not a secret that this is a very early build. It's also not a secret that Halo 3 will look like the trailer. That is a fact.

I myself said they don't look that great. It's not a secret. It's also not a secret that this is a very early build. It's also not a secret that Halo 3 will look like the trailer. That is a fact.

Yeah dude I totally agree with you! It'll be like when the first Halo 2 drop ship vid was released!..... Oh wait... Well at least it was like that E3 2003 level set in the city!... ok maybe not that either. Stop going off fanboy emotion and think about that your saying.

No, I'm not. I'm just reiterating that graphics of that quality will not occur in Halo 3. I stand by that statement proudly. If those graphics were so possible, why aren't they there right now since they already developed them? Because, as I already said -- the tech demo was missing A.I. and physics. Halo 3 won't look that good. That's a promise.

I don't see why not, Gears of War looks as good as the E3 trailer did, and people were able to control Master Chief backstage (Gamespot etc if I recall correctly). You promising means nothing.

ok girls show is over, time to settle down. :yes:

go have a cup of tea and retouch your makeup before you two start losing your glamour... :laugh: :rofl: :p

Well said mate..

Can't we just keep this topic on Halo 3, and it's new developments, instead of comparing it with old stuff..?

They better concentrate more on the gameplay (single one at that) then the bloody graphics. I want a game that takes some skill to play unlike the ###### autoaiming noobfest that Halo 2 turned out to be.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!