CNN Ridicules Microsoft Zune


Recommended Posts

Typical of the press... comparing apples to oranges instead of apples to apples and oranges to oranges. And why not someone who actually knows what they are talking about. Anyone who watches CNN in the morning knows they are idiots.

I was quoted, so I guess that was directed at me... First, I don't thing my argument is that terrible. An absurd comparison was made on the show so I pointed it out. Second, I'm sorry if my jokes are too childish for you. I was commenting on how everyone on this forum rips into FoxNews on a constant basis, (check out just about any topic about politics) when in reality the other news stations are just as bad. People definitely need to lighten up around here though. We're not fighting holy wars, we're just debating.

That's a standard practice in the console market and there is good logic behind it. In the mp3 player market, not so much.

No i meant to say that in this case, I think people who hate Zune are just cheering because Zune got hurt by this report, and not because any of the arguments or jokes were good.

In the same way some people like certain news sources even if they report poorly because they agree with them; or hate them even if they report well because they disagree with them.

My point is that I'm neither a Microsoft or FoxNews fanboy; I just think people should realize this is a case of bad CNN reporting. It wasn't attacking you at all

Sorry, but the only way you'll get people to switch from their iPod to something else is to allow them to transfer their entire library to the new device easily. That includes iTunes music.

And since iTunes music can't be transferred to other devices (unless you have an app that strips DRM, but sshhhh...), it's gonna be VERY difficult to make people switch away from their iPod.

In fact, I think we're at a point now where it's going to be hard to make people switch from whatever it is they're already using.

or are you just happy that Microsoft is looking bad?

You know, actually, I am. I'm damn glad that Microsoft is getting railed over this, and I hope Vista turns out the same way. Because Windows is what got me thinking computers were cool, over a decade ago, and not something that must be fought with in order to get something done. And it's been a slow and steady decline since then. Windows XP brought that back up for a bit, and so did the Xbox, but by and large, Microsoft has gone from being a company that makes compelling products that I want to use and am interested in, into a company that puts out cludge that I'm compelled to use out of neccessity due to interrelated software and services. I'm sick and tired of these mediocre, half-assed "oh well it's good enough, lets churn it out" releases that have been coming from Microsoft lately, and I want something better. I want to see a Microsoft product and go "Wow, that's kinda cool" instead of being told it's cool in a marketing campaign, then realizing it falls far short of expectations. Is that too much to ask from one of the most important, innovative and powerful corporations on the planet? I don't think so.

Hahaha, wow, that's a pretty bad review by CNN. :blink:

I do believe that comparing a video iPod would still have made the iPod look better, but that comparison was apple and oranges. You can't even manage your music well, much less video, with a Shuffle.

Ugh. Mark my words, the iPod will die. It won't necessarily be because of another player, but because of oversaturation. I know a lot of you have made the comments about people buying iPods because they're cool, and that's the dead truth. The iPod is a fad and people will move on. It's just not as cool as it used to be, and that's not for lack of features - it's because everyone has one.

I guess before iPod fanboys flame me, I should mention I own an iPod, and after it dies, I might look into the Zune, but will probably end up with an iPod nano.

When I say it'll die, I don't me completely gone, I just mean it won't ever be nearly as popular as it is now. There's logically only one direction it can go from it's position.

-Spenser

Edited by stifler6478

just remember people this is first generation of it for MS, look how 1st gen things progress... iPod wasnt that great 1st gen, the Dell Axim was clunky first gen and people compared it to the iPaq which was much smaller and ligher, but now Dell Axim's are very nice PPC's XBOX was basically a out of date PC when it came out but look at the 360, its a massive computing device... you have to start somewhere and work your way up to greatness, greatness doesnt come in the first try always

I dont like the Zune much, but some of its feature are better than the ipod.

However the repoter is stupid.

Compare a normal Video Ipod and Zune.

Not Zune vs Shuffle ofcourse the Zune will be heavier etc...

Some other examples:

Compare a ferrari to lamborghini.

not ferrari to average ford.

OMFGWTFBBQ the ford cost so much less and still gets you from A to B why would you want a expensive ferrari.

I got to play with the zune today at work and i was pleasantly surprised. It is a lot smaller and sleeker then I thought it would be. You can definitely count me in as one of the people to buy the Zune especially with it being able to share the tv shows and movies downloaded on my 360.

However the repoter is stupid.

Compare a normal Video Ipod and Zune.

Not Zune vs Shuffle ofcourse the Zune will be heavier etc...

You're missing the point. You have to look at it from her perspective: The Zune is being marketed primarily as a music player, and all SHE needs in a music player is what the shuffle offers. She doesn't CARE that it has a video screen and 30x more capacity, it's just a another music player.

But in all, NONE of them had any sort of enthusiasm at all for the Zune.

I find this to be very shallow and pedantic.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

At least they pointed out that the Shuffle held less music, I think that's the main point. Besides, most people buy mp3 players to listen to music, not look at videos on a tiny screen at a crappy resolution.

I don't like zune for the same reason I don't like the Ipod they are both "closed", you can only buy from here and only manage it using itunes or whatever zune uses.

That's why I bought the ZVM, they are not trying to push their codecs/other products trough their players, they are just selling DAPs.

That review was biased in some ways, but like most it hit the nail right on the head. Microsoft released it only because the iPod was a thorn in its side. People will flock to buy the Zune as much as they flock for prunes. Correction, prunes serve a purpose.

You're missing the point. You have to look at it from her perspective: The Zune is being marketed primarily as a music player, and all SHE needs in a music player is what the shuffle offers. She doesn't CARE that it has a video screen and 30x more capacity, it's just a another music player.

But in all, NONE of them had any sort of enthusiasm at all for the Zune.

OMFG did you not read my post?

I clearly understand thus i made a comparsion between a ford and ferrari.Ferrar vs lamborghini

Look carfeully:

Ferrari V12 ...................................................Lamborghini V12

Italian ......................................................... Italian

$300K+ .........................................................$300K+

320Km/h+.........................................................$320Km/h+

There is a fair comparison when almost everything is identical then It just coem down to the look

Now

Ferrari V12...........................................................Average Ford V4-V8

Italian...................................................................American

$300K+.................................................................$10-50K

320Km/h+................................................................180Km/h?

Now this comparsion is like shuffle vs Zune who cares about a turbocharged V12 engine that goes from 0-100 in 4 secs flat. All I need is a car that gets me from A to B. Thats what the silly reporter is doing. She is compring a base product mto top of the line.

Now if she compared weight/size/price of VIDEO ipod and Zune then said the Zune is a POS, Heavy etc.. I will listen to her.

they are comparing a 5th or 6th generation ipod to the first generation of Zunes? lol... oh yea i loved what the woman said... email? hahahaha dumb people dumb people!

I wonder what kind of email she does on the shuffle... :D

For all the ****ing idiots on this board arguing, shut the hell up. It's ****ing annoying, and it's the same redundant **** over again. Seriously, this world has become who can say the biggest opinion to change the other's mind.

This ****ing CNN report is a ****ing joke. Why would they put a lady reporter talking about an electronic device, not that women do not know anything, but this lady was just plain stupid. Email, it's not a ****ing pda. Does it look like it has a ****ing keyboard on it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!