[NFL] Ladanian Tomlinson's records--worthless w/visor!


Recommended Posts

When Casey Martin asked the PGA to let him use a golf cart, they said no. Part of the game is walking, so he had to take them to court to get it out of them.

Guess what? Part of being a running back or receiver is the fact that your opponents can see your eyes. Now, Mr. Visor is shattering records because his opponents have no idea what he's looking at; they can't defend receptions because they don't know where the ball is coming from, they can't see if they have help behind them on runs.

Yeah, he's got a doctor's prescription to wear a dark tinted visor, but I don't see him on the sidelines wearing sunglasses. Does he have some magical medical condition that allows his eyes to work normally when he crosses the out of bounds line?

Having a medical condition doesn't entitle you to unfair advantages. Ask Troy Aikman if they allowed him to have flags so he didn't get tackled. Ask Casey Martin if he the PGA give him a cart without being forced by law to do so. What's next? A short NBA player with stilts? Free and indefinite timeouts when a player gets a migraine? There are a lot of NFL players that are not going to be happy that Ladainian Tomlinson is shattering all their hard-earned records with an advantage that few if any other player gets.

It wouldn't be so bad if he weren't already a phenomenal player, but the visor gives him just enough edge to make him more than human.

Wow I never knew about that rule. I don't see enough SD games to know if this is helping his runs. If he's running to the outside a lot I would say definately since it's more one-on-one. If he's primarily a between-the-tackles runner I'd say it has more to do with his o-line blocking. Again though, if he's juking the linebackers to get extra yards, you still hve a point.

Well I guess you can look at it this way.

Football is a competitive sport, 'LDT' has a unfair advantage and he's getting the big bucks and as it goes that'll only increase, meanwhile his opponents are getting trampled, their salaries are diminishing and eventually they too will look to gain an advantage, perhaps Steroids, perhaps Eagle Eye Vision, or maybe just big heels.

But if football isn't appealing to you, then this means nothing.

He has no unfair advantage by wearing a visor. Those of us who actually PLAYED football know that in most cases the game is being played too quickly to recognize anyone's eyes besides the Quarterback. To be honest, the best way to anticipate a player's move, especially a running back, is to watch film. Linebackers spend hours watching RB's tendencies. For example, last week, you saw LT's cut to the inside after a small hook play to the outside. When there's no men to the outside, a back will often wait for the defense to roll towards that direction and then he'll cut inside. LT just happens to be able to do this better than anyone in the league. He is Barry Sanders with Marshall Faulk's size and recieving ability. He's the best player in football, and quite possibly (well, arguably) the best running back in NFL history.

People are just starting to notice. Don't blame it on the visors.

Oh, and I'm an Eagles fan. Don't even bother calling bias.

As a San Diego native and a Chargers fan I just have to laugh at this.

Take away LT's visor and he would still run all over just about anyone. Reading eyes :blink: You ever played football?

:angry:

LT is one of the best backs to play the game now or ever. Peeps could argue to no end if hes the best ever. But with or w/o the visor hes better than anyone else at the moment. Ive seen other players wear the visor how about we start bashing on them..oh wait..they arent #1 so its okay for them...

ACTUALLY...

If you were a DB in HS or College, there is an advantage to looking at a player's eyes. You don't immediately need to turn to look for the football on throws. Although, it is good practice... if you are caught unaware, checking an opponent's eyes helps tremendously in gauging passes.

Also, running backs have a tendency for looking where they are going, it isn't like basketball where you head fake pass and pump fake shots, etc. It does slightly give him an advantage as far as unpredictability goes, but... a lot of players have worn those and haven't seemed as spectacular as LT. I'd say he's a beast of a running back regardless of the tinted visor.

But saying that eyes don't matter is absurd considering it is common practice for LBs and Lineman to watch QB's eye movements, and arm action for pass blocking/interception seeking. Watch the clip where Urlacher picks Pennington this last weekend.. Urlacher actually jumps before the pass is thrown due to Pennington staring at his receiver and then throwing. And then Urlacher actually says in the end game interview that Pennington needs to learn to take a quick look, not stare. It is part of the game, although saying LT can't wear a visor, who cares, he still has to follow his blocking and holes.

I had to laugh at this thinking that this takes away from his credability as an NFL PLAYER. I don't understand how someone can blame a visor for missing a tackle, or not knowing where a ball was being thrown at a certain point.

Get me a tinted visor and a uniform and I'll pass up the league's records for TDs in my rookie season...please. :rolleyes:

  • 2 weeks later...

Do you guys really think that the defense have the time to read every player eyes and react and that speed?

Get real guys, the only player you SHOULD read his eyes is the QB.

Do you guys really think that the defense have the time to read every player eyes and react and that speed?

Get real guys, the only player you SHOULD read his eyes is the QB.

True. I can see a rare instance where it would help a DB by reading a RB/WR's eyes, but they should be covering them closely enough by that time to know if the ball is coming or not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!