Mac OS X 'Leopard'-related Discussion


Recommended Posts

So far I'm unimpressed by what I've seen of Leopard. They won't fix the Finder - I don't like the idea of Coverflow previews in the least. Most the 'new' features seem gimmicky. I'm not expecting a revolutionary new OS every 2 years but there are some flaws with OS X that they don't even seem to be addressing.

I'm therefore considering seriously not buying 10.5 and I'm really not even considering buying a new Mac. I'm probably going to install Linux on my iMac G5 and buying a Windows computer. It would genuinely be nice if there were more 'Windows' app makers making OS X apps but since that's not going to happen, I'm going back to Windows - though my Windows computer is not going to connect to the Internet! ;)

To a certain level I have to agree. Mac OS X Leopard isn't really that special. Sure it has some nice improvements and it has a fresh feel to it but there isn't much in there that will really change the way I work on my Mac. But then again, I don't think Windows Vista is that of a big deal compared to Windows XP either. It looks like both Apple and Microsoft have come to an impasse where they can't really fundamentally improve things without drastically change their operating systems and perhaps even the way we interact with computers.

Why you would want to install PPC Linux on your iMac instead of Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger is completely beyond me though.

I'm going back to Windows - though my Windows computer is not going to connect to the Internet! ;)

You're not happy with Tiger or impressed with Leopard, you have posted you'll probably install a Linux distro over your iMac and instead return to a Windows OS with no internet connection.

Am I missing something here? Is this supposed to be a good choice?

So far I'm unimpressed by what I've seen of Leopard. They won't fix the Finder - I don't like the idea of Coverflow previews in the least. Most the 'new' features seem gimmicky. I'm not expecting a revolutionary new OS every 2 years but there are some flaws with OS X that they don't even seem to be addressing.

I'm therefore considering seriously not buying 10.5 and I'm really not even considering buying a new Mac. I'm probably going to install Linux on my iMac G5 and buying a Windows computer. It would genuinely be nice if there were more 'Windows' app makers making OS X apps but since that's not going to happen, I'm going back to Windows - though my Windows computer is not going to connect to the Internet! ;)

"I'm going back to Windows." Did I read that right?

Looks like someone really wants to waste cpu cycles on antivirus software.

But I guess with enough lipstick, shiny surfaces and transparencies, even woefully lousy code can look attractive.

You're not happy with Tiger or impressed with Leopard, you have posted you'll probably install a Linux distro over your iMac and instead return to a Windows OS with no internet connection.

Am I missing something here? Is this supposed to be a good choice?

Windows + no Internet is to avoid all the spyware and crapware. I like to do work on my computer without worrying that someone is going to take it. Ditto for financial software. It can still be connected to a network on occasion to download software. I don't see that being a problem.

@.Neo

I see PPC Linux as something that 'just works'. IBM's done a lot to get its PPC chips working on Linux kernel so I don't see it as a downgrade. True its the same with OS X. But running on my hardware with a Radeon 9600 and 1 Gig RAM, frankly, I'm not impressed with OS X. Typing long documents in Word and Pages is hard because the screen draws in OS X are bloody slow in both programs. I know Word was under is not fully Coco but I'm not paying for the next one. I've tried some smaller alternative word processors some freeware others payware and not impressed with OS X. The new Intel Macs seems to work it fine .... but I'm not buying another Mac.

@LTD - there are some specific apps I need for work and for furthering my career. They are Windows only apps. Guess which platform I'm going to need. And my iMac G5 won't run Windows well. Hmmmm. Nevermind that for a few of these apps, the Mac version is generally several builds behind (yes app maker responsible for that). This effects the quality of the work and the # of bugs in the program.

I could keep writing to justify but I'm stopping. Seems whenever someone buys a Mac everyone says congrats. But when someone moves away from Mac everyone asks ... are you insane? I'm not. I just have a change in priority and know what I need to get my work done.

I see PPC Linux as something that 'just works'.

Interesting view.

From what I can tell you're nothing short of extremely demanding when it comes to Mac OS X, but you are completely willing to let that all go when it comes to Windows or Linux.

But hey if you have your reasons to switch to another system you should. That's what I did as well. :) Investing money in something you don't feel comfortable with is one of the worsts things one could do.

Edited by .Neo
Windows + no Internet is to avoid all the spyware and crapware. I like to do work on my computer without worrying that someone is going to take it. Ditto for financial software. It can still be connected to a network on occasion to download software. I don't see that being a problem.

@.Neo

I see PPC Linux as something that 'just works'. IBM's done a lot to get its PPC chips working on Linux kernel so I don't see it as a downgrade. True its the same with OS X. But running on my hardware with a Radeon 9600 and 1 Gig RAM, frankly, I'm not impressed with OS X. Typing long documents in Word and Pages is hard because the screen draws in OS X are bloody slow in both programs. I know Word was under is not fully Coco but I'm not paying for the next one. I've tried some smaller alternative word processors some freeware others payware and not impressed with OS X. The new Intel Macs seems to work it fine .... but I'm not buying another Mac.

@LTD - there are some specific apps I need for work and for furthering my career. They are Windows only apps. Guess which platform I'm going to need. And my iMac G5 won't run Windows well. Hmmmm. Nevermind that for a few of these apps, the Mac version is generally several builds behind (yes app maker responsible for that). This effects the quality of the work and the # of bugs in the program.

I could keep writing to justify but I'm stopping. Seems whenever someone buys a Mac everyone says congrats. But when someone moves away from Mac everyone asks ... are you insane? I'm not. I just have a change in priority and know what I need to get my work done.

OK, I get most of that - makes sense.

I use a Windows PC at work as well. In fact, the software we run is industry-related and Windows-specific (accounts recovery software called ACE), so obviously. And I do understand that some people need particular Windows apps at home as well. But for everything else, and there's *alot* of "else", why choose Windows? I use Windwos because I have to. I'm forced to do it at work. I come home to my Mac where, incidentally, I feel most productive in terms of getting the most out of a computer. I'd say buy an Intel-based mac and you'll have a system that has greater shelf life and usability than anything else out there. But you don't seem to be motivated to do so. You don't think it's worth the money in terms of what you'll use it for. I can understand that, I suppose.

You're a computer *user*, and not really a platform afficionado. You've got your reasons. In fact, it's kind of good that you don't mind switching from system to system. If you're equally comfortable in Windows as you are (were) in OS X, and perhaps in Linux, then more power to you. Fair enough.

Can someone with Leopard and InDesign tell me if Quick Look can preview INDD files please.

I just tried it for you, and no, currently Quick Look won't preview INDD files. Either Apple or Adobe will probably (and hopefully) release a CS3 Quick Look plugin once Leopard hits GM.

Viewing already supported files, especially documents be it from Word, Pages or simply .rtf, isn't exactly picture perfect either.

Edited by .Neo
To a certain level I have to agree. Mac OS X Leopard isn't really that special. Sure it has some nice improvements and it has a fresh feel to it but there isn't much in there that will really change the way I work on my Mac. But then again, I don't think Windows Vista is that of a big deal compared to Windows XP either. It looks like both Apple and Microsoft have come to an impasse where they can't really fundamentally improve things without drastically change their operating systems and perhaps even the way we interact with computers.

Why you would want to install PPC Linux on your iMac instead of Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger is completely beyond me though.

Both Leopard and Vista have included major improvements under the hood. In a way, having new user interfaces are sort of a "bonus." Vista, for example, uses a radically improved kernel based on Server 2003, but you'd never know this as it's not something you can see. The same thing with Leopard. The kernel has been improved a bit, as it's not true Unix, and it features improved networking, especially with other PCs.

I agree that there isnt anything major added to OS 10.5 but thats for the same reason that people dont see the major improvements in Vista.

99% of the work is under the hood

50% of the improvements are only noticeable on powerful machines.

Vista has a Major work under the hood, too boring to go into but OS 10.5 is more then likely the same.

Some things to need to be added, like having a built in uninstallation application. It's a real pain to have to download the Parallels Trail just to uninstall Parallels from my system.

but I really believe that OS X will make a sudden change for the better (like Vista RC1-RC2) we'll get a sudden improvement about two weeks before the launch, then after a few months Leopard will become more stable and powerful then tiger.

Well, I didn't really mean to make that style universal, but yeah, since Leopard has a constant UI, it would be obvious that other apps look the same... So I tried to wok a little bit on Safari, the result isn't all that ugly IMO, I really like it :

hey i quite like that! :D i think it looks MUCH better than the current brushed metal look :)

Both Leopard and Vista have included major improvements under the hood. In a way, having new user interfaces are sort of a "bonus." Vista, for example, uses a radically improved kernel based on Server 2003, but you'd never know this as it's not something you can see. The same thing with Leopard. The kernel has been improved a bit, as it's not true Unix, and it features improved networking, especially with other PCs.

Mac OS X Leopard on Intel is true UNIX. Apple got the official certificate for it.

Overall the amount of end-users features of Mac OS X Leopard are a bit disappointing. Doesn't matter how you twist it, regular people won't cough up ?129 (or in Windows Vista's case ?300+) because the OS received a bunch of under-the-hood changes.

there are lots of reasons that i cannot wait for this release. mostly, time machine, spaces, and a fully unified UI. i will be sure to snag this as soon as i can get my paws on it!!

Like always going back to the previous Mac OS X version, in this case 10.4 Tiger, is a bit of a pain. No doubt about that! :D

The UI looks very clean now compared to Tiger, starting to love the new Menu Bar as well:

picture1xg6.png

The more I see of Leopard the more I like it. I've tried an earlier build which was impressive but had the transparent menu bar. But these screenshots and others posted around of the current developers release just keep getting better.

Roll on October

is coverflow really that useful?

i dont use it in itunes (some of the songs i have dont have an album art, too local, too whatever, so no need) and yea im not sure wheather it really makes sense... even in pictures-folders i highly doubt it. i prefare the thumbnail-view...

what are your experiences?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!