Windows Vista System Requirements Released


Recommended Posts

Oh i'm not saying it doesn't run bad on 1gb if nothing is loaded, however Vista at startup uses 600mb of ram.

Play a game and Vista is worse than XP on 1gb, or play some music, surf the net and use messenger, it begins to get slower.

Vista is a ram cow, it uses 400mb more than XP at startup. It's a shame I find.

OK you really need to stop talking. The OS taking a lot of memory is a GOOD thing it makes the OS respond faster and it releases memory as it is needed by other programs. What would you rather have? an OS trying to get memory from other programs or the OS already having the ram allocated and it just lending it to programs as needed? using more ram just makes the OS more efficent. Ram is ment to be used...why are you bitching that it finally is?

Also I run 1GB and do Dreamweaver, Fireworks, VS.net 2005, office 2007 all the time and have NEVER had any issues is my 2GB machine quicker? yes. But how much of that is do to the fact it has a 10,000rpm HDD, dual channel, better GPU a faster CPU? and its not amazingly better just smoother if anything.

The systems im speaking of are in my sig. and aside from the desktop being smoother I wouldnt really call it faster at all, more efficent yes. Neither are faster then XP was on the same machine.

LOL....It blows my mind that people still think a DVD-ROM drive is some sort of major investment. You can nab the damn things for like $20. Hell, you can get a DVD Burner for less than $30. If your PC doesn't have a DVD Drive, then it prolly doesn't have enough power to run Vista anyway. No offense, just my opinion.

***Disregard this if you're talking about a laptop.***

Completely agreed. When DVD burner drives are $30, in my opinion no computer game or application of any kind should ever be produced on CD-ROM anymore. I cycle my old machines to different rooms, and my build from like 4 computers ago has a DVD drive.

Not this stupid argument again.

Offer time, system requirements for everything increase. You make it sound bad that a Operating system made for today's computers don't run on the minimum system requirements of Windows XP when it was released. Seesh.

Technology gets faster, and to Operating systems, software, games need to use faster hardware to take advantage of the new/more advanced technologies. *sighs*

Excatly. The system requirement of XP was controversial, but nowadays, the system specs of XP is meh and almost everybody have systems today that can run XP with much ease. This will be same for Vista. 5 years from now we will have systems that will run Vista with ease - as well as XP. XP will be like running Windows 98 on todays computers.

OK you really need to stop talking. The OS taking a lot of memory is a GOOD thing it makes the OS respond faster and it releases memory as it is needed by other programs. What would you rather have? an OS trying to get memory from other programs or the OS already having the ram allocated and it just lending it to programs as needed? using more ram just makes the OS more efficent. Ram is ment to be used...why are you bitching that it finally is?

Also I run 1GB and do Dreamweaver, Fireworks, VS.net 2005, office 2007 all the time and have NEVER had any issues is my 2GB machine quicker? yes. But how much of that is do to the fact it has a 10,000rpm HDD, dual channel, better GPU a faster CPU? and its not amazingly better just smoother if anything.

The systems im speaking of are in my sig. and aside from the desktop being smoother I wouldnt really call it faster at all, more efficent yes. Neither are faster then XP was on the same machine.

I'm sorry but i'm not going to stop talking.

I just find the requirements under rated. I'm not the only one who agrees with me on that.

Seeing how 98 went to XP, it used double the ram, thats fine, but XP to Vista uses more than double the ram. Sure ram is meant to be used, but not excessively when idle.

The XP requirements were under rated as well. How about you go on XP, run all your programs on 128mb of ram (which is recommended), it won't be optimal. 512MB-1GB made things so much better. Anyone agree on that? lol

The XP requirements were under rated as well. How about you go on XP, run all your programs on 128mb of ram (which is recommended), it won't be optimal. 512MB-1GB made things so much better. Anyone agree on that? lol

If XP was meant to work better with minimum requirements than recommended or anything above, it wouldn't be a good OS still today. Vista is not meant to be used with today's computers. It works with them, but it will be optimal with the computer's that not everyone can afford, right now. Minimum requirements are what work, not what is optimal.

People need to stop talking as if all new computers come with DVD drives.

There's a good chunk of brand new computers that don't come with a DVD drive/burner even though they're dirt cheap now.

Also, not everyone who owns a computer wants a DVD drive. If Microsoft is releasing a CD-Rom version of Vista I'm not surprised by that at all.

To the people saying a PC without a DVD drive is worthless....GET A CLUE!

Until the day comes when all software or games is released on DVD, then there's no reason at all to switch over if you don't have any need for a DVD drive.

Until the day comes when all software or games is released on DVD, then there's no reason at all to switch over if you don't have any need for a DVD drive.

Soooo the fact that Vista was originally DVD-only still doesn't count as a "need for a DVD drive"? :rofl:

The day will come. And we're getting to it slowly. It wont happen in just "one day".

We demand for next gen OS and more efficient OS than what we have now and yet we refuse to make changes on our side of the consumer. You want this and that in Windows but yet you refuse to make the chances necessary on your end.

If OSX were to be sold without the MAC machines to people like you.. I bet its gonna be the same problem like what it is now too. You cant install Tiger on Panther machines coz the OS requirement is greater to ensure performance.

If u're happy with ur present config. Then continue using it. Dont bitch about stuff.

No one is forcing you to use it.

Hold up. Let me get it right For u. Microsoft is forcing me to use VISTA, new software and updates will soon only be available for Vista just like officce 2007 is not available for windows 2000. Maybe not now but by the time vista SP1 comes out microsoft will make you get vista or screewww you over

People need to stop talking as if all new computers come with DVD drives.

There's a good chunk of brand new computers that don't come with a DVD drive/burner even though they're dirt cheap now.

Also, not everyone who owns a computer wants a DVD drive. If Microsoft is releasing a CD-Rom version of Vista I'm not surprised by that at all.

To the people saying a PC without a DVD drive is worthless....GET A CLUE!

Until the day comes when all software or games is released on DVD, then there's no reason at all to switch over if you don't have any need for a DVD drive.

I looked, and could only find 3 computers without a DVD drive, and they were refurbished, and PLEASE give me one reason that someone wouldnt want a dvd-rom. Name ONE single advantage a cd-rom has over a dvd-rom. Yeah we get it, you hate windows and everything microsoft, but you are really strecthing it on this. You are bitching about one of the most stupid things you could possible bitch about.

Here you go

and i only have 1gb of ram and a core 2 duo and onboard graphics, and vista hands down runs faster then what xp does on here.

nice now we have the offical specs we can see how obsurde and how much we need to blow just for this stupid OS

Which brand of pole, reel, line, and bait do you use for your trolling?

All I see is a lot of heat from you and very little light.

--ScottKin

If you don't have a DVD-ROM at the minimum on your computer, (or laptop evne) it's time to upgrade. That rock that sitting on your desk, is about as good as a door stop....

Those rocks make great donations for charity, no?

Hold up. Let me get it right For u. Microsoft is forcing me to use VISTA, new software and updates will soon only be available for Vista just like officce 2007 is not available for windows 2000. Maybe not now but by the time vista SP1 comes out microsoft will make you get vista or screewww you over

Well, if they did force you to use Vista, no one would be using Office XP, or 2000 - which both of these suites are still commonly used. No one would be running equipment controlling PCs using Windows 98 or older (i.e. a machine controlling the lights of a theatre). No one would be able to hit CTRL+ALT+DEL on those numerous Windows NT 4 systems in the workforce. Point-of-sale machines in numerous supermarkets will cease to function just because they use Windows 98, 2000, Me, and to a far lesser extent, XP. Those rural families living away from modernism won't have a clue as to why they were locked out of their computers. Oh yeah, even those gigantic billboards in major cities will suddenly go blank.

End of support doesn't indicate them forcing you to upgrade, mmmmmkay? Get back to me when they start timebombing their OSes.

Even with support discontinued for, say, Windows 98, you're bound to run into a few individuals on the 'net that put together unofficial fixes.

It still amazes me how people moan about how much RAM Vista uses compared to previous Windows versions. The purpose of RAM is for quick access to information that the system needs. Exactly the same with the registers down on the CPU level. When info is needed, the registers are first searched at very high speeds. If the data required is not found there, the computer looks elsewhere, normally at RAM. Now as the RAM is so vast nowdays (1gb and over) plenty can be stored there and it's up to the OS to manage what's placed there.

Yes, Vista does run a bunch of services that require memory, however Vista uses a completely (and more efficient) RAM allocation technology. See, what it does is keep track of what programs you use frequently. So if you use Word quite a bit, the startup files for Word will be cached by Vista into RAM. You then see Vista taking up more memory than XP as XP didn't do this, however now when you decide to run Word, the system no longer has to load data from the hard disk, which as we know is painfully slow, but it takes what it needs from RAM which is much quicker.

Don't think that just because your RAM usage has gone up it's a sign of bloat. I'm not saying Vista uses RAM 100% effectively, it just utilizes more RAM to speed up your computing experience.

Please, oh please, don't be suckered into those Free-Your-Memory programs for Vista. Why pick up info from the hard drive when it's been cached in RAM for you? Why do you think Vista runs smoothly on computers with less than 1Gb of RAM?

Suddenly Vista is out, a DVD-ROM is costly. But not when Spiderman 3 or LOTR is released on DVD's and u own a top of the line HD-DVD set top player. Getting XBOX 360, PS3 or Wii is not a problem, but getting a DVD-ROM for ur pc suddenly is a huge finanical problem. For god sake you people..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!