AutoPatcher XP December 2006


Recommended Posts

@vearn27, theres no way with AP5.1 for me to detect whether you have SNMP installed, so theres no way to hide it when you don't need it. perhaps AP6 whenever its finished will have some way to do it.

Oic, thanks for the explanation and also the release :D .

Anyway, I have another question in mind that I actually wanted to ask long ago. All the while I'm using Update Release since I installed the April Full Release. Say if I uninstalled and install a brand new Full Release, would the installed updates still being detected and tweaking done to be 'greened'? :unsure:

@vearn27, uninstalling AutoPatcher does not revert any of the stuff you installed with it! You are perfectly safe to uninstall your copy of AutoPatcher and replace it with a newer full/lite release.

To reverse the stuff you installed with AutoPatcher: for tweaks, use the tweakundo tool included with AutoPatcher; for everything use add/remove programs, else if not available in there, either take a look at the modules setup instructions to determine how to reverse it, or ask for instructions here in the forum.

done. autopatcher xp december 2006 PT-BR unofficial uploaded. changelog:

892211

918997

923694

925168

925398

926247

926255

928089 (em ingl?s)

KB928388 (hor?rio de ver?o em diversos pa?ses)

KB929120 hor?rio de ver?o no fuso hor?rio da Austr?lia Ocidental (Perth)

928939 (em ingl?s) (hor?rio de ver?o austr?lia ocidental)

eu font update (em ingl?s)

RDC6 (em ingl?s)

RMS (kb917275)

==============================

module updates/fixes/changes

==============================

same than english (plus winrar 3.62, removed winrar 3.61), except by names, keeped original and, of course, module names

now all module tree should be expanded by default

==============================

modules removed

==============================

same than english, plus .net 2 (instalation order changed to .net 3). translation pack for .net 2 keeped

it doesn't include windows defender

issues detected after upload:

detection for instalation of webfolders are not the same for PT-BR and english. english is: {7CCEBC24-62DB-4280-A8EC-BFA49F167920} and for PT-BR it must be {545AF448-4FE8-4E57-8B51-165F259435F9}. it's installed fine anyway. just instalation detection is wrong, so, it will be fixed next month;

translation pack for .net 2: it must be instaled after .net 3 and is installing before. so, you may see that also a needed update on windows update. if you with, you can run autopatcher again and manually select to install it (because it installs anyway and is detected by autopatcher and unselected). not a big deal anyway. so, it will be fixed next month.

if you wanna try anyway:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=M2KAMFNQ

md5: 8b06c69e9c1e8e2ff330905f3284173b

~347MB

http://rapidshare.com/files/8763745/autopa....part1.rar.html

md5: 85d5326c25ad4a512d454a204b9886f8

~97,7Mb

http://rapidshare.com/files/8773521/autopa....part2.rar.html

md5: 1134101ef1391c963e30566ceed75387

~97,7Mb

http://rapidshare.com/files/8791640/autopa....part3.rar.html

md5: 37ed08a1d3034e70aae52947921be42a

~97,7Mb

http://rapidshare.com/files/8801910/autopa....part4.rar.html

md5: 67174343a58c907f050eaf8ab7678c5f

~60,6Mb

enjoy and feliz natal (mery xmas)!

Yes, every once in awhile this happens. The torrent @ the moment has:

123 seeds | 213 peers ,which is quite healthy :)

I forwarded the information to Kefro, but he's very hard to get ahold of.

I will try again today...

THX !

but statistic not work

Size ul dl xfer dls time byte/s

0 0 0 0 00d00h00m 0/s

^ if your deleting modules then be careful to make sure parts of the module don't creep back in with newer update releases! sometimes i may include new copies of the .amc and .lst files to fix a bug, you'd then have a broken module (the setup file wouldn't be included in the update release unless that had been updated with a newer version). also note that occasionally i do fix minor things like adjusting priorities/names that aren't important enough to mention in the changelogs.

Yeah, thats why I never apply the update to the AutoPatcher files. I apply it to a new directory and then merge.

hi i installed and patched my xp on Sept and never updated again after that. my question is.. do i have to download previous updates from previous months or should i just download december update to keep updated?

thanks for your answers and happy holidays to everyone!

hi i installed and patched my xp on Sept and never updated again after that. my question is.. do i have to download previous updates from previous months or should i just download december update to keep updated?

thanks for your answers and happy holidays to everyone!

Just download November full, then the December update, and then the December Update Fix. That should bring you XP up to date.

also reported before, autopatcher xp december 2006 PT-BR unofficial has some issues regarding bad detections and a bad instalation order to .net 2 translation pack. just to not be only that 2 fixes, i've checked a few more detections and i've notice some other bad detections, regarding:

kb831240

KB892211

KB917275

WinLiveMsngr

taskswitch_powertoy

shockwave

foxitreader

this ones was installed fine, but if you runs AutoPatcher again, you may see them also a needed update. to fix that translation pack for .net 2, instalation order to .net 2 translation pack was changed too. so, it may fix all issues regarding this release. you just need run AutoPatcher_XP_Dezembro2006_PT-BR_QMUP.exe and select "Atualizar um release FULL" and it's done. notice that it is tested only with this release.

any other issues not detected, please report.

download links:

http://rapidshare.com/files/8937924/AutoPa...R_QMUP.rar.html

md5: 27dbb3ff2b89db339291ddd990a83dab

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=0781BO4V

md5: 27dbb3ff2b89db339291ddd990a83dab

sorry for any truble regarding my mistake.

merry xmas to all

[]s and be in peace

Installed Nov FULL, then Dec Update. Ran AP and got this error:

Module Panic on Update for Windows XP (KB887742)! You are running Windows XP Professional Edition (English -- locale 1033) + IE7. This release is not suitable for your system. 35602: Key is not unique in collection.

What does this mean?

Installed Nov FULL, then Dec Update. Ran AP and got this error:

Module Panic on Update for Windows XP (KB887742)! You are running Windows XP Professional Edition (English -- locale 1033) + IE7. This release is not suitable for your system. 35602: Key is not unique in collection.

What does this mean?

Could somebody answer this? Because I got the same error when I installed AP Nov

Updated: Dutch Release

Torrent:

http://autopatcher.scarywater.net/AutoPatc...ULL.exe.torrent

Cachefly.com Servers:

http://autopatcher.cachefly.net/AutoPatche...06_NLD_FULL.exe

MD5: 296c6ef39682f1d0fe5e86ddb7e9ce60

Edited by Oddstar

^ your probably clicking on the wrong thing, the fix is available directly from this page. do not click the bullet pointed links, click the link in the sentence about the bug fix! the bullet pointed links just point here and similar threads!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!