AutoPatcher XP December 2006


Recommended Posts

post-161462-1167745310.jpg WTH? You mean January 2007?

Also, why hasn't this topic (and the others) been pinned? BTW, this new IP.Board RULZ.

Individual release threads aren't being pinned anymore, they're just linked to from the main "AutoPatcher Releases" thread

What exactly does "Unofficial" mean on the Windows Media Player 11 (Unofficial) update?

That the module has not been made official by the AutoPatcher team. Perhaps it got corrupted or modified.

for pt-br, the first option is valid. i haven't uploaded that to theblazingangel encript it yet (but it can be done, anyway, since that it's uploaded and links for that are posted). i'm 3000km from home now, so it will be done only next week. anyway, you can check that md5 to see if you have downloaded the same thing that i have at home. and i'm running that version. but helps a lot if informed what ap version you have. there's a few ones, you know

I have run the December update and the patch, and then I ran it again because I decided to add Windows Live Messenger back on (had problems with it before), and then I even ran AP one more time to make sure there weren't updates to WLMsgr. Each time I have run AP, the Critical Update KB926247 and Windows Component update for Windows Rights Management Services Client with Service Pack 2 have appeared in black and selected, as if I don't have them yet, and I have selected and installed them each time, but they keep appearing in black.

If it matters, I have XP SP2, and I have not upgraded to IE7. I had previously installed Defender and WMP11, but I have uninstalled both of these and I choose not to use them for now.

After the uninstall/reinstall, WLMsgr now seems to be working fine and doesn't lock up anymore.

I read that KB926247 has something to do with SNMP, but I have no idea what that is or if I have it. I tried to read through here about it, but I'm afraid a lot of the technichal discussions are over my head.

Otherwise, thanks again for a very useful tool!!

Happy New Year!!!

I have run the December update and the patch, and then I ran it again because I decided to add Windows Live Messenger back on (had problems with it before), and then I even ran AP one more time to make sure there weren't updates to WLMsgr. Each time I have run AP, the Critical Update KB926247 and Windows Component update for Windows Rights Management Services Client with Service Pack 2 have appeared in black and selected, as if I don't have them yet, and I have selected and installed them each time, but they keep appearing in black.

If it matters, I have XP SP2, and I have not upgraded to IE7. I had previously installed Defender and WMP11, but I have uninstalled both of these and I choose not to use them for now.

After the uninstall/reinstall, WLMsgr now seems to be working fine and doesn't lock up anymore.

I read that KB926247 has something to do with SNMP, but I have no idea what that is or if I have it. I tried to read through here about it, but I'm afraid a lot of the technichal discussions are over my head.

Otherwise, thanks again for a very useful tool!!

Happy New Year!!!

It's normal for this to fail to install

what exactly does an "update" do since im a "have drive will travel" type geek i would like to have an autopatcher set on a portable drive but drinking is required in my case (im running linux so Wine/Cedega is needed) so if i have a full release and then run the update what is going on.

(it would help if i could just unzip the two and overlay but...)

what exactly does an "update" do since im a "have drive will travel" type geek i would like to have an autopatcher set on a portable drive but drinking is required in my case (im running linux so Wine/Cedega is needed) so if i have a full release and then run the update what is going on.

(it would help if i could just unzip the two and overlay but...)

The update release just extracts the new and updated files into the existing AutoPatcher folder.

can someone tell me how to install updates? I have the August Full file. Do I just install the August file and then the December file? Or do I need to install the August Full file and September, October and etc updates?

Also where do I download the December fix file? I have been reading this thread and the autopatcher homepage and it seems I should be able to get the fix from this URL: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=521219. But I cannot find the download link for it.

thanks for the help

can someone tell me how to install updates? I have the August Full file. Do I just install the August file and then the December file? Or do I need to install the August Full file and September, October and etc updates?

Also where do I download the December fix file? I have been reading this thread and the autopatcher homepage and it seems I should be able to get the fix from this URL: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=521219. But I cannot find the download link for it.

thanks for the help

You'll need either all of the update releases, or delete your AutoPatcher folder and grab November Full and December update.

The fix can be found here: http://autopatcher.cachefly.net/AutoPatche...4_Patch_ENU.exe

Hey Guys (theblazingangel, etc),

I have notived that when you are at the http://www.autopatcher.com/about/ page and you click on any of the items under the # Current Releases

# AutoPatcher 2000

# AutoPatcher XP

# AutoPatcher 2003

# AutoPatcher XP/2003 x64

The listing that shows up does not have a Date associated with it!

For example the listing for AutoPatcher XP shows:

AutoPatcher XP

This is a complete list of what the latest release of AutoPatcher XP includes. Items in green are either new or updated entries in this release. If you're looking for downloads, head down to our download page

Windows XP SP2 - Critical Updates

KB873339: Security Update for Windows XP

KB885835: Security Update for Windows XP...

This is a small item but it shud be fixed to show the date of the release so as to alleviate any confusion/problems!!

Just thought I wud let you all know!!

Keep up the fantastic work on this program and a hearty THANK YOU for the work you do!!

Sincerely,

Cindy

Hey Guys (theblazingangel, etc),

I have notived that when you are at the http://www.autopatcher.com/about/ page and you click on any of the items under the # Current Releases

# AutoPatcher 2000

# AutoPatcher XP

# AutoPatcher 2003

# AutoPatcher XP/2003 x64

The listing that shows up does not have a Date associated with it!

For example the listing for AutoPatcher XP shows:

AutoPatcher XP

This is a complete list of what the latest release of AutoPatcher XP includes. Items in green are either new or updated entries in this release. If you're looking for downloads, head down to our download page

Windows XP SP2 - Critical Updates

KB873339: Security Update for Windows XP

KB885835: Security Update for Windows XP...

This is a small item but it shud be fixed to show the date of the release so as to alleviate any confusion/problems!!

Just thought I wud let you all know!!

Keep up the fantastic work on this program and a hearty THANK YOU for the work you do!!

Sincerely,

Cindy

i know, thanks, a lot of work needs to be done on the site to bring things up to date, i'll try to do some stuff after i've finished the releases

Thanks for the AutoPatchers; your work is very much appreciated! :)

I have the August Full and Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec Updates installed. I noticed the December one doesn't have the Module Details button now, which I thought was a good idea and is missed.

Also, would it be possible to have a full-screen option on the installer? Sometimes the module descriptions run out of view, and the dialog box seems a bit claustrophobic sometimes :p

@maf74, module details can now be accessed via the right click menu. ap5.1 does not have a maximize button but you can resize the window! the maximize option will most likely be present in ap v6, or did you mean the actuall nsis installer, 'cus if so i'll have to look into that...

@everyone, new releases are up and available on several mirrors now, i'll post the new release threads, and update the website, etc tomorrow, its really late now, i need sleep :sleep:

@maf74, module details can now be accessed via the right click menu. ap5.1 does not have a maximize button but you can resize the window! the maximize option will most likely be present in ap v6, or did you mean the actuall nsis installer, 'cus if so i'll have to look into that...

@everyone, new releases are up and available on several mirrors now, i'll post the new release threads, and update the website, etc tomorrow, its really late now, i need sleep :sleep:

Ah, thanks for that. Yeah, I was just meaning an optional resize of the module window - but you cleared that up for me :)

And for the module details, I'll be right-clicking :D

Cheers!

@maf74, module details can now be accessed via the right click menu. ap5.1 does not have a maximize button but you can resize the window! the maximize option will most likely be present in ap v6, or did you mean the actuall nsis installer, 'cus if so i'll have to look into that...

@everyone, new releases are up and available on several mirrors now, i'll post the new release threads, and update the website, etc tomorrow, its really late now, i need sleep :sleep:

Ah a feature which will be approved by a few (resize option).

Jan downloads available http://ap.manroweb.co.uk

Great. And to download from your site we have to allow advertisements or be re-directed to a Google search results page on why we shouldn't block ads. Why not simply tell people that they can't download from your site unless they support your hosting costs? Even if your point is valid (and I'm not arguing one way or the other), its a irritating method of getting it across.

I think I'll wait for the official mirrors.

Respectfully (if annoyed),

Jacob M.

Great. And to download from your site we have to allow advertisements or be re-directed to a Google search results page on why we shouldn't block ads. Why not simply tell people that they can't download from your site unless they support your hosting costs? Even if your point is valid (and I'm not arguing one way or the other), its a irritating method of getting it across.

I think I'll wait for the official mirrors.

Respectfully (if annoyed),

Jacob M.

Agreed :|

Great. And to download from your site we have to allow advertisements or be re-directed to a Google search results page on why we shouldn't block ads. Why not simply tell people that they can't download from your site unless they support your hosting costs? Even if your point is valid (and I'm not arguing one way or the other), its a irritating method of getting it across.

I think I'll wait for the official mirrors.

Respectfully (if annoyed),

Jacob M.

its irritating for me to explain 40mbit+ constant over 2 days to my host and seeing as ads dont come close to covering the cost (on a good month i make back about 10%) i don't give a monkies if it irritates you and you use another mirror, it saves me bandwidth. If you or other people would donate to the cost of my personal* i'd gladly remove ads for those who donated. Also, if ad revenue picks up i'll remove the forced ads or maybe at least put up another way of informing people

* bold to show donations to me personally not to those making autopatcher

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!