FORCE slow USB drives work READYBOOST in vista


Recommended Posts

This "hack" is the most useless piece of information I have seen on Vista yet...

ReadyBoost devices don't just add on as "extra RAM" its only used for disk caching...using slower than MS spec is just dumb....just spend the few dollars it will cost to get one that is compatible you cheapskates!!

Couldn't agree more :yes:

Actually using a flash drive as a swap mechanism is better than going to the hard drive for many reasons.

1 - the hard drive may be doing other things when an application wants to swap a page to the hard drive, the hard drive then has to go back and forth from the swap file to the working file to do its job.

2 - The hard drive generally have a slower seek time than a flash device. A flash device can access any section of memory at any time without having to seek to it, therefore going to and from a flash drive is faster.

The fact is that the transfer rate does play a role in this, but it is ultimately the seek time that should be considered. You aren't writing large files to the swap, you are writing a page of RAM, which is generally pretty small.

So yes, if you have a blazing fast hard drive(or more than one drive which is the optimum solution) then doing this will cause a bottleneck, but if you have a moderately slow hard drive, and insufficient RAM, depending on what you are doing this could provide a speed increase.

It's so simple, yet people are confused by it...

1. ReadyBoost is "between" RAM & HD when it comes to caching

2. The reason USB sticks can make a difference is because of the near-null latencies when reading/writing and that makes all the difference when it's handling 4kb pages.

3. The bandwidth for USB sticks are on the other hand waay lower than for any normal HD

4. Windows caches bits and pieces of programs that it believes you're going to use (from an algorithm sensing what you start and when and how often)

5. If the USB stick is slower than the MS specs, any gain by using an USB stick will disappear, and the slower it is (while being used), the worse the performance. It's NOT used as RAM, it's a small in-the-middle pagefile on an USB stick in 4kb pages.

6. If you have 1Gb or more, you won't notice a difference.

7. ReadyBoost was pretty much made for people with older computers and older laptops that couldn't upgrade their RAM or didn't want to for some reason.

1Gb RAM > 512mb + ReadyBoost (512-1Gb stick)

If it's a fast stick it doesn't hurt to leave it in and have it as a ReadyBoost device no matter what amount of RAM you have, but the more real RAM you have, the less impact it will make, and above 1Gb of RAM, ReadyBoost will be very difficult to notice at all.

Isn't this tip pretty useless. The guy says that Readyboost has already been made so it accepts the slowest possible USB that will provide a noticable performance difference. Anything lower would just make your PC slower, wouldn't it?

  • 3 weeks later...
I can't get it to work, even though I've edited the registry, the drive won't function as a ReadyBoost device. :(

It keeps switching back to 'Do not use this device.' :(

Your device prob has sow regions, go back into regedit and look for "Has slow regions" with the value of 1. Change the value to 0 and re-insert your usb device, it should work now

  • 4 weeks later...

I was planing to buy SD or CF or Memory stick Card to do so even though I have 2 GB of Ram, reason why I want to do is to Extend the life of HD as I hope onece windows no more write constanntly on HD with Pagefile, the life of HD will be extended normaly ? what do u think ? and also I need advise what type of Card should I go for ?

thanks :)

  • 5 months later...

I NOTICED THE READYBOOST COMPATABILITY TWEAK

HKLM (Local Machine)->SOFTWARE->Microsoft->Windows NT->CurrentVersion->EMDgmt

Find your device

Change ReadSpeedKBs to

Change WriteSpeedKBs to

FOR SLOW FLASH DRIVES

i changed the read write to several different values wich does seem to effect performance so the entered value was the actual bench speed of flash drive ,cause of readyboost stutter in games

THE FLASH I USE IS COMPATABLE but not "made for readyboost". THE READ ,WRITE SHOWS LIKE 1673 KBS ,,THE VALUE VISTA ENTERED AS DEFAULT

MY GAMES STUTTER ?

1673 KBS TO MBS = LIKE 1 MBS?

I BENCHED MY DRIVE WITH HD TACH READ IS 24 MBS

SO ENTERED THE VALUE IN REGISTRY FOR READ, WRITE AS 24576 kbs -> 24 mbs

WHICH IS 1024 X 24 = 24576

, 1024 KBS = 1 MBS

Windows ReadyBoost is a great technology, caching things on USB drives to improve system performance, but Windows Vista insists on checking the drives for certain speed requirements before enabling the feature. If you have a USB drive that is just a hair to slow to beat the test, or you want to use an external hard drive (slower speed, loads of cache space), Matt Rajca posts at Channel 9 how you can force Vista to let you use ReadyBoost on an unsupported device, whether it wants to or not :

1. Plug in the device.

2. Open the Readyboost tab on the device properties.

3. Select ?Do not retest this device?

4. Unplug the device

5. Open regedit (start->run->regedit)

6. Expand - HKLM (Local Machine)->SOFTWARE->Microsoft->Windows NT->CurrentVersion->EMDgmt

7. Find your device.

8. Change Device Status to 2

9. Change ReadSpeedKBs to 1000

10. Change WriteSpeedKBs to 1000

11. Plug in the device.

12. Enable Readyboost!!!!

NOTICED THE READYBOOST COMPATABILITY TWEAK

HKLM (Local Machine)->SOFTWARE->Microsoft->Windows NT->CurrentVersion->EMDgmt

Find your device

Change ReadSpeedKBs to

Change WriteSpeedKBs to

FOR SLOW FLASH DRIVES

i changed the read write to several different values wich does seem to effect performance so the entered value was the actual bench speed of flash drive ,cause of readyboost stutter in games

THE FLASH I USE IS COMPATABLE but not "made for readyboost". THE READ ,WRITE SHOWS LIKE 1673 KBS ,,THE VALUE VISTA ENTERED AS DEFAULT

MY GAMES STUTTER ?

1673 KBS TO MBS = LIKE 1 MBS?

I BENCHED MY DRIVE WITH HD TACH READ IS 24 MBS

SO ENTERED THE VALUE IN REGISTRY FOR READ, WRITE AS 24576 kbs -> 24 mbs

WHICH IS 1024 X 24 = 24576

, 1024 KBS = 1 MBS

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!