Breaking News: Cisco Sues apple over iPhone 'name'


Recommended Posts

Pubicity issue.. maybe? Its probably not going to hurt them too much.. but the product has been all over in the news as "iPhone" already and there is a good chance that Apple might have to pay a fee for this too. so yeh i dunno

While it is true that it has been all over the news as the iPhone, most consumers won't remember about it when it is released. The iPhone won't be released until June of this year, so by then most consumers aren't going to remember the name and it will be very easy to rebrand it as a different name. I don't see a problem at all.

I thought Cisco sold the patent to Apple for a boatload of money like an hour before Apple unveiled the iPhone. Hrm.. :unsure:

It isn't a patent, it is a trademark. Apple and Cisco were in talks to allow Apple to use the trademark, however Apple went ahead of finalizing a deal with Cisco and publicly announced the iPhone. Cisco didn't like this and is now suing Apple.

"Cisco entered into negotiations with Apple in good faith after Apple repeatedly asked permission to use Cisco's iPhone name," said Mark Chandler, Cisco senior vice president and general counsel, in a statement. "There is no doubt that Apple's new phone is very exciting, but they should not be using our trademark without our permission."

Another name suggestion: iCall

I think it sounds pretty nice.

The problem with that is iCall only describes the phone as a phone and the iPhone is so much more than a phone. I don't think iPhone does this all-in-one wonder justice either. Apple has such an awesome marketing team I can't figure out why they have come up with a better name that would revolutionize the cell phone/pda/smartphone industry.

When you think about the MP3 market, you think of it an the iPod market. The iPod was a unique name, they didn't call it iMP3 Player because that really doesn't describe the power of the iPod. The iPod is a very unique device as is the iPhone and the name really is a poor choice on Apple's part in the first place.

iLife-2-Go

That's actually a really good name. It's to bad that iLife is taken by software because just calling it iLife would be awesome.

Apple needs to come up with a phone name that is unique like BlackJack or BlackBerry. Those are cool names and that are easily remembered. iPhone is just to blah!

Stupid Apple, should have reached an agreement before the Keynote.

Anyway, Apple's in the wrong here, either going to reach an agreement, or just change the name (i doubt they have even submitted it to the FCC yet, they have lots of time to change it)

iPodPhone? iPhonePod? iTalk? iTouch?

I acutally cannot see anyway in which Apple think they are gonna be successful here. Just cause you own iPod, iMac, and pretty much i[AnythingElse] it doesn't give you rights to someone else's trademark, even if it is similar. Everyone saw the iPhone coming for a looong time. Apple should have registered the name a lot earlier.

*Goes off to trademark iZoom* :D

The name is something very critical for Apple, and if they end up having to change the name from iPhone to something else...it won't just be a small deal..for them this is make or break. If they dont get it, things would get ugly for Apple. I really can't imagine Apple even giving up that name..tough to happen. Should be interesting how things turn out.

Haha. I love it.

The negotiations aren't going fast enough so Steve shows the phone anyway, without having the right to the iPhone name yet.

Not to mention the legal right to even sell the phone in the US, as it still has not officially received FCC approval yet. Wouldn't it be funny if for some strange reason, the phone ended up not being cleared for sale?

Just goes to show the arrogance of Apple. They think that because they sell so many ipods they have the right to use any ibrand they want. They muscled over several smaller companies to use the names so i'm glad Cisco aren't being pushed around on this one.

Go Cisco.

look whaat was on the iphone's site:

This device has not been authorized as required by the rules of the Federal Communications Commission. This device is not, and may not be, offered for sale or lease, or sold or leased, until authorization is obtained.
iThinkAppleDeservedThisRoyally.

iLikeIt! :laugh:

I hope Cisco take them to court and force them into giving up the name. Apple have been bullying small companies and individuals for some time over names that they don't deserve. About time someone bullied them back!

I'm sure this is going to be settled out of the court. All ya'll wanting payback to Apple won't get it. :p You'd have better luck looking towards the stock options trouble they're in.

Well, if Cisco decides not to settle (unless Apple pays a hefty, hefty, price) then I'm sure they will win on this hand. They've had it since 2000, way earlier than when the stock of the iPod started to raise.

In fact that trademark was registered on March 20, 1996 by Infogear, Cisco went on to buy them in 2000.

Also it's worth noting that Cisco didn't want money for the use but wanted Apple to open up the platform to some of there services.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Right, Google... because that's who this is going to. Google, the company who's entire business model is geared around ad revenue and your personal data.
    • That is the natural course for regulations. First to protect the consumer. Then to protect the business/industry from upstart competition. There are countless examples across history.
    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!