Recommended Posts

sorry just seen that after i posted tried to edit

Well I think the latest photo seals it for one that mentioned George Stephenson [http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blrailroad7.htm]

It just seemed that Glenn Seaborg was just not quite right based on the other inventions listed.

From Inventors Hall of Fame

It shows that the Reaper was patented in 1834

Cyrus McCormick of Virginia was responsible for liberating farm workers from hours of back-breaking labor by introducing the farmers to his newly invented mechanical reaper in July, 1831. By 1847, Cyrus McCormick began the mass manufacture of his reaper in a Chicago factory.

Try replacing JW with 1722 for pulsation engine by John Whitehurst

After the dialog and pictures found of the Wachs I'd go back to James Watt for JW

I believe the intention was to point to the steam machine but they screwed up

with the picture.

Year ? the wiki says that he had a working engine in 1765.

i tried putting the initials in chronological order of when the inventor invented the device.

BF (1752)

JW (1763)

GLL (1774)

HD (1806)

CM (1809)

GS (1814)

LP (1862)

TE (1877)

AGB (1880)

GM (1901)

but when i put the initials in the answer box in that order with only a space between each, i had no luck.

Edit: forgot one. going to include it and see if i can work something out. : \

If we add up the time between the dates is there any pattern? If so, we could extend (or prepend?) the pattern to a date before or after and see if there's an invention on that date... Maybe that's the answer?

After the dialog and pictures found of the Wachs I'd go back to James Watt for JW

I believe the intention was to point to the steam machine but they screwed up

with the picture.

Year ? the wiki says that he had a working engine in 1765.

I think they hosed the entire Mural puzzle... There are multiple dates that could be used for a few of them too. For example, do they mean Marconi's first transmission, his first experiment, his first trans-Atlantic transmission, his patent dates, his... wait... if this is all about vanishing maybe it's the dates all the inventors died! :)

By averaging the dates of the inventors I get 1822.67 . In mid-1822 Charles Babbage invented the Difference Engine.

I think 1822.52 is within a margin of error, given over the last several posts we've been fiddling a year here, a year there.

Still don't know what the actual answer is though.

I don't believe we'll find exact records of the years for each couple of inventions and

we may be waisting effort like the tomb puzzle trying to figure something from the

numbers besides that they are all contemporary, most of them created their

inventions in the 19th century and many of the inventions contributed to the

industrial revolution.

The problem is that what we are supposed to provide as an answer, a missing

inventor ? a commonality between all them ? the effects or their inventions ?

I don't think we'll get anywhere with the years, besides to validate that they are

from the same generation.

Hmmm "name plates on each door" and "don't forget the baseboards" sounds

familiar ?

My .02

Out of all these inventors, only 1 was awarded the Nobel prize for physics, and it was not him alone. it was jointly awarded to GUGLIELMO MARCONI and CARL FERDINAND BRAUN in recognition of their contributions to the development of wireless telegraphy.

not sure yet if this might pertain to the answer, but I am still looking.

I don't believe we'll find exact records of the years for each couple of inventions and

we may be waisting effort like the tomb puzzle trying to figure something from the

numbers besides that they are all contemporary, most of them created their

inventions in the 19th century and many of the inventions contributed to the

industrial revolution.

The problem is that what we are supposed to provide as an answer, a missing

inventor ? a commonality between all them ? the effects or their inventions ?

I don't think we'll get anywhere with the years, besides to validate that they are

from the same generation.

Hmmm "name plates on each door" and "don't forget the baseboards" sounds

familiar ?

My .02

Maybe this will help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_invention

Out of all these inventors, only 1 was awarded the Nobel prize for physics, and it was not him alone. it was jointly awarded to GUGLIELMO MARCONI and CARL FERDINAND BRAUN in recognition of their contributions to the development of wireless telegraphy.

not sure yet if this might pertain to the answer, but I am still looking.

And for a couple of them was difficult to affirm who really invented the thing first.

And for a couple of them was difficult to affirm who really invented the thing first.

I was thinking lasting effect meant the one that was useful. e.g.: Tesla may have discovered radio transmission, but he didn't see the use in it. Marconi perfected it for communications...

I don't believe we'll find exact records of the years for each couple of inventions and

we may be waisting effort like the tomb puzzle trying to figure something from the

numbers besides that they are all contemporary, most of them created their

inventions in the 19th century and many of the inventions contributed to the

industrial revolution.

The problem is that what we are supposed to provide as an answer, a missing

inventor ? a commonality between all them ? the effects or their inventions ?

I don't think we'll get anywhere with the years, besides to validate that they are

from the same generation.

Hmmm "name plates on each door" and "don't forget the baseboards" sounds

familiar ?

My .02

I tend to agree with you. The only other thing in the mural that we haven't addressed is the backdrop in the mural itsself. In the early pitctures it is of clouds and sky. The farter to the right you scan we begin to see stars and space. Should we be looking for the inventors of flight?

I may be thinking in the wrong direction, but looking at the name of the puzzle Mural, the phrase People And Dates With Lasting Effect, & the fact that the picture moves. I was thinking in the direction of Motion Picture. I could not get anything to work so far, but it is just a thought.

I tend to agree with you. The only other thing in the mural that we haven't addressed is the backdrop in the mural itsself. In the early pitctures it is of clouds and sky. The farter to the right you scan we begin to see stars and space. Should we be looking for the inventors of flight?

I thought about that as well. I tried Goddard (rocketry) and Wright (airplane)...

I tend to agree with you. The only other thing in the mural that we haven't addressed is the backdrop in the mural itsself. In the early pitctures it is of clouds and sky. The farter to the right you scan we begin to see stars and space. Should we be looking for the inventors of flight?

Hehe, when I saw the clouds changing color, since it's seems that the pictures of the inventions are in

chronological order I tried with "Pollution" but didn't work :-)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      260
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!