MacOSXMan Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs...34/1005/OPINION United Nations an instrument for one-world rule By BENJAMIN G. VUKICEVICH For the Courier-Post Is the so-called globalization concept truly the path to one-world government? If so, how will it be accomplished? Which organizations will be involved? Will it be the Republican or Democratic Party that will be the proponent of this one-world rule? Can history enlighten us? Yes. The organizations that will lead this combined effort to one-world rule are the scandal-ridden United Nations, the World Affairs Council's insidious Declaration of Independence, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the ultra-secretive Bilderberger Organization and the Law of the Sea Treaty. Is it fact or fiction that, nationally, we are controlled by a group of elected elitists? And was there a conspiracy on the part of more than 125 members of Congress in 1976 to completely change the monetary systems and processes of production in America to regulation by international authorities? They did, and with impunity. The primary instrument for this one-world rule is the United Nations. Its sole purpose was and is the seat for this one-world utopia. In addition, the United Nations wants to tax Americans and wants America to lend it $1 billion to expand the New York headquarters and is commencing its absolute control of all oceans by adopting the Law of the Sea Treaty. Power groups Nationally, we are controlled by a group of elected politicians who are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission who hold interlocking positions in the media, financial systems, unions and academia. Every president since Woodrow Wilson up to and including President Clinton, except Ronald Reagan, has been a member of both groups. President George H.W. Bush resigned from both the council and the Trilateral Commission before being elected. President Bush is a member of the secret Skull and Bones fraternity. The United Nations is the depository for one-world rule/domination. In 1976, more than 125 members of Congress publicly endorsed delivering America's sovereignty to total control of unnamed international authorities. Why does the United Nations want American taxes and money for expanding its office building. Only to bring forth an all-consuming and stifled one-world government. This has been partially accomplished by the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, adopted on April 30, 1982 and opened for signatures during December 1982. The die has been cast. Will we succumb? Which party was prone to have more members of Congress willing to deliver the economic soul of America to collaborative control by international authorities. Without a doubt, it is the Democrats. On Jan. 30, 1976, the World Affairs Council of Philadelphia convened a ceremonial signing by members of Congress of a Declaration of Interdependence that was promulgated by Henry Steele Comminger in 1975. Democrats agreed At this signing, more than 125 members of Congress publicly agreed to the declaration. Of these, about 102 were Democrats and 22 were Republicans. Are voters in the recent election certain of the candidates they sent to Washington? I asked Jim Florio at a public meeting why the former governor and congressman signed the declaration and to what international authority he wanted to surrender America's sovereignty. Florio responded that the declaration was a bilateral agreement. It was a stupid response. Florio apparently never read paragraph 13 that is the sellout of America to international (United Nations) authorities. Look up When you visit the Rotunda in the State House in Trenton, look up and see the portrait of Florio and you can wonder if he could have done it and did you vote for him. Yes, he did. Wake up America, before it is too late. The writer was a member of the U.S. Marine Corps in World War II and is a resident of Stratford. Published: January 07. 2007 3:10AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Derf Veteran Posted January 24, 2007 Veteran Share Posted January 24, 2007 I can't even keep these conspiracies straight. I thought you were against a neo-con new world order. The UN represents the diametrical opposite approach. Please don't tell me that you think they are working together? [Thread Moved from RWI to Area51,H101] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts