Admiralty Arch

By Xtremist
in Digital Camera Lab

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...
Rising Star

Xtremist

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I kinda like the first one as it is a bit more colorful...

Do you have higher resolutions? I'd love to try this out as a wallpaper.

so do u want to pay for a wallpaper or not???

will be 5 pound for full res

the image will be urs but it must have a anycloud.com watermark down at the bottom

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/533802-admiralty-arch/#findComment-589757564
Share on other sites
Veteran

Scazza

Posted
Posted

Ha, that is classic.

First of all the 9 month old thread revival, then 2nd he is charging ?5 for a single wallpaper with a watermark.......and has an attitude.

"Do you want to buy the wallpaper or not".

I think after 9 months of no reply I think thats a no.......

Shame I am at work so I can't see the pictures but there is no way you should be charging for wallpapers LoL!

Never ever come across some one charging money for a wallpaper, a print yes but a wallpaper, never.

Also do you have a website? As I would love to see the pictures that you charge for. As they must seriously be amazing. Link?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/533802-admiralty-arch/#findComment-589760896
Share on other sites
Rising Star

Xtremist

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Ha, that is classic.

First of all the 9 month old thread revival, then 2nd he is charging ?5 for a single wallpaper with a watermark.......and has an attitude.

"Do you want to buy the wallpaper or not".

I think after 9 months of no reply I think thats a no.......

Shame I am at work so I can't see the pictures but there is no way you should be charging for wallpapers LoL!

Never ever come across some one charging money for a wallpaper, a print yes but a wallpaper, never.

Also do you have a website? As I would love to see the pictures that you charge for. As they must seriously be amazing. Link?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/photoxtremist/

nd also what i charge is cheap compared to others, especially since im a pro

on my website (www.anycloud.com) you'll find my prices

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/533802-admiralty-arch/#findComment-589761590
Share on other sites
Veteran

Scazza

Posted
Posted
http://www.flickr.com/photos/photoxtremist/

nd also what i charge is cheap compared to others, especially since im a pro

on my website (www.anycloud.com) you'll find my prices

Thanks for the links.

I have to agree with Crazy here, I just looked through your flickr page and your website and from what I have seen I'm sorry to say this but I wouldn't call you a pro.

You have access to a studio which is cool, but the photos are not that great considering youre calling yourself a Pro. Really nothing that makes me think wow. I tried getting on the pricing page but it wouldn;t load so I don't know what you charge (but as you say it's cheap I can see why).

If you want to see some portraiture photos which I would consider pro, check out places like Venture (Venture Gallery). I feel that they have a nice feel to them and like the photography has a lot of interaction and the people look like they are enjoying being photographed. Also the photo editing is lot more professional too. Yes they are expensive and you can see why.

Sorry to seem harsh and that with some critic but if you are earning a living from this then I am in the wrong job and should start taking my photography more seriously and start earning a living from it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/533802-admiralty-arch/#findComment-589762848
Share on other sites
Mentor

Dev Null Zen

Posted
Posted

So wait, I have to get this straight. You call yourself a pro yet:

You advertise you use your schools studio

Your images on your front page aren't coded properly

You forgot to put in the pricing page

You and your 'partner' list all of the equipment you use on the webpage

Your prices are on your 'business' site, in a word doc

8 of your selected images on CD (high quality fine art shots as shown on the website. With a variety of stylish processing treatments including black and white sepia and colour) -?50 + ?10 for each additional image.

Single price per image with selected treatments on CD- ?30

and

30 of your selected images on CD (high quality fine art shots as shown on the website. With a variety of stylish processing treatments including black and white sepia and colour) -?100 + ?10 for each additional image.

Single price per image with selected treatments on CD- ?20

All this, from a couple of high school kids that want to say they are pro? Can you see where the skepticism comes from?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/533802-admiralty-arch/#findComment-589766756
Share on other sites
Grand Master

goodcase

Posted
Posted
So wait, I have to get this straight. You call yourself a pro yet:

You advertise you use your schools studio

Your images on your front page aren't coded properly

You forgot to put in the pricing page

You and your 'partner' list all of the equipment you use on the webpage

Your prices are on your 'business' site, in a word doc

All this, from a couple of high school kids that want to say they are pro? Can you see where the skepticism comes from?

Not to mention speed of website, and quality of photos.

"6?4″ ?9.00

7?5″ ?12.00

8?6″ ?14.00

12?8″ ?17.00"

thats kind of pricey too BTW. $18.00 for a 4x6?

Compared to my co-worker: http://jcthephotographer.com/ , who btw, doesn't consider himself pro.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/533802-admiralty-arch/#findComment-589766768
Share on other sites
Experienced

o0moonman0o

Posted
Posted

rofl, well a pro is a pro if he provides a service to customers but theres also a difference between an average joe and a creative photographer. being able to shoot strobes with a white background isn't the best way of being creative.

oo and forgot to add, for pics in the beginning of this thread if i was a customer i wouldn't pay for that kinda work. infact if it was a stock photo i probably won't use it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/533802-admiralty-arch/#findComment-589796024
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • SQL Server Management Studio 22.7 brings "What's New" page, T-SQL formatting, and lots more

      By wrack · Posted

      Formatting would be awesome if fully customised and then roll out the settings as a company wide standard.
    • Instagram now lets you manually reorder posts on your profile grid

      By PeterTHX · Posted

      I just want to know why the volume control feature in the browser version keeps appearing then disappearing, here today - gone tomorrow. Now it's gone again. Annoying as hell.
    • U.S. delegation throws away all burner phones and gifts from China before takeoff

      By PeterTHX · Posted

      When you have only lies and blood libels to present, you've lost. And how hard is it for you to look up BBC and AP? You hate Jews, just admit it.
    • Claude on Windows is eating up massive amounts of RAM, with no way to stop it

      By TheGhostPhantom · Posted

      This article does not make sense and it’s very evident, the bug wasn’t confirmed to exist, because the application itself runs on editions of Windows which make it impossible to run Hyper-V VMs on, “Basically, Claude Desktop on Windows spins up a 1.8GB Hyper-V virtual machine if you use Claude Cowork or agent mode even once.”, suggests the bug is caused by something else otherwise it would only happen to users with the capability of running Hyper-V VMs and that’s only if Hyper-V was enabled which is by default not enabled. The true issue is that the author who reported the bug used the incorrect terminology, it’s actually a container, not a VM that is being started by the way. There were users on macOS reporting the same issue, Hyper-V, doesn’t exist on that platform obviously. Every single user who confirmed the problem in the last week was either using macOS making this issue impossible to be relevant to them, or was a comment talking about WSL, which the author indicated 3 months ago was disabled.
    • Stack Overflow is launching a version of itself for AI agents

      By TheGhostPhantom · Posted

      “To prevent hallucination issues and keep the database clean, the platform uses a multi-agent verification loop to check code quality.” - This absolutely isn’t happening. ”Before the massive rise of LLMs, which tanked its traffic by about 50% over the last couple of years, Stack Overflow was the go-to website for millions of programmers seeking coding solutions.” - It still is trusted, because the community of users, blocked other users from submitting false and misleading answers generated by AI agents that can be convinced something it generated is actually incorrect even if it’s actually correct. The company itself doesn’t know what it wants to be so it keeps trying and failing to introduce AI features to the platform. This effort will also fail, already submitted one successful poison pill, look forward to generating more.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      211
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      83
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!