AOL Preparing Netscape Browser 9.0


Recommended Posts

post-108961-1170713563.png

What you are looking at is a draft of the main toolbar of Netscape 9.0, running on Windows XP

Although it hasn't seen a major update in well over a year, the Netscape browser is about to get a makeover, according to a teaser posted to the Netscape blog. Version 9.0 of the software, which AOL reincarnated in 2005, is due in the coming months.

An AOL spokesperson declined to discuss specifics with BetaNews just yet, but a number of things are already known about Netscape 9. Most notably, the browser will have deep integration with the new Netscape.com user-driven news site that debuted last year and mirrored the functionality of Digg.com.

Also, developers say it will remain a standalone product built atop Mozilla's Firefox code base; it will not contain a mail client or Web page editor. Instead, the browser will integrate a number of different Firefox extensions that relate to Netscape.com, including a Friends' Activity Sidebar and Sitemail Notifier.While version 8 of Netscape was largely outsourced to Mercurial Communications, AOL has created its own development team for 9.0. The new browser will now be cross-platform, compatible with Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Smaller features are getting focused on for 9.0, such as a redesign of Netscape's FTP view.

When it was first reborn, the Netscape Browser was intended to be a friendlier version of Firefox, adding more privacy features and phishing protections, as well as the option to render pages using Internet Explorer's Trident engine for compatibility. The software included a "Trust Rating" system that warned users of potentially dangerous Web sites.

However, uptake was slow as Firefox adoption soared, leading many to speculate the effort would simply be abandoned. Now, it seems AOL ostensibly plans to pitch Netscape 9 as a complementary desktop application to Netscape.com.

Netscape developers plan to publish new information about version 9.0 each week on the Netscape Blog.

Source: BetaNews

Edited by MchWalte
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/536399-aol-preparing-netscape-browser-90/
Share on other sites

What they should do is allow their AOL Explorer browser to use the Mozilla engine and realize that. AOL Explorer is actually a pretty good browser and would be able to garner more interest than a faded Netscape brand.

It is, but people don't use it because it has 'AOL' in the name... :no:

^ AOL is hated too much. They should either provide 1 solid alternative to Firefox or nothing at all. They've got way too many as it is.

Just because some kiddies here treat the company like it has the plague, you can't underestimate their stance in the US market. Not to mention, they've made a huge turn around. If they can win me over, they can win anyone over.

Just because some kiddies here treat the company like it has the plague, you can't underestimate their stance in the US market. Not to mention, they've made a huge turn around. If they can win me over, they can win anyone over.

But they do not even advertise Netscape, the consumer has long forgotten about Netscape, and with Firefox ranking up advertising, I think AOL will need invest money into Netscape, which they do not have.

But they do not even advertise Netscape, the consumer has long forgotten about Netscape, and with Firefox ranking up advertising, I think AOL will need invest money into Netscape, which they do not have.

That's why I suggested using AOL Explorer instead of Netscape.

I'd suggest they just use Firefox. IMHO, the only reason why they don't is to keep the IE numbers high and the Mozilla/Firefox number low.

AOL has a contract with Microsoft to use Internet Explorer in both the AOL client and AOL Explorer.

What an unbelievable, unfathomable, incredible, complete and without a morsel, atom, or subatomic particle of doubt the most insane, dumb and ridiculous waste of time i have heard about in quite a while. "browsers" are DEAD: there IS only Firefox and IE (Opera - what's that?). Basing a new "browser"/waste of everyone's time, on an already existing Firefox which has extensions for almost ANYTHING only makes me think that whoever decided to do this deserves instant castration so that their dumb genetic pool does not infiltrate humanity.

I dont see the point really. With version 8 which I didnt like they at least tried to differentiate their product by allowing the IE and Mozilla rendering engines to be interchanged. While it wasnt a good browser really I cant see this as being a step forward. Sure the product FINALLY seems more focused in that they have removed the email client but if you want a slim browser then your likely going to go firefox anyway. I think perhaps they should have explorred the IE + FFx engine route a bit more rather than falling back to a standard firefox browser with a new theme and some AOL centric extensions. Really thats nothing exciting or particully useful.

Actually I think its about time they let netscape die completly. It's been a long time since netscape offered anything that would really suit anyone besides only the most hardcore AOL users. People who dont need AOL integration can do alot better elsewhere. I just dont see what niche in the market AOL is aiming for. It seems to me to be a product with an identity crisis that is being released abd its death postponed just because.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reluctantly forces strict new age checks on Texas users starting today by Paul Hill Apple will begin enforcing the Texas Age Assurance Law (SB 2420) following a recent court ruling that lifted an injunction on SB 2420. Starting June 4 (today), Apple will enforce strict age-verification and parental-consent rules for new Apple accounts created in Texas. This move will affect children under 18 who go to download apps or attempt to make in-app purchases. Apple previously expressed privacy concerns related to this law, but compliance is now mandatory for the company, nevertheless. Apple will use several APIs to follow the law. Principally, the Declared Age Range API will fetch the specific user age bracket (Under 13, 13-15, 16-17, or 18+) and a verification method. The Significant Change API (PermissionKit) will trigger a system dialog for parental consent if an app gets a major update or an age-rating shift. There is also a new property type in StoreKit that allows developers to automatically check when their app’s age rating has changed on a user’s device and then use the Significant Change API to request parental consent. Finally, App Store Server Notifications can be configured to tell developers when a parent revokes consent, blocking app launches. To ensure they are ready for these changes, developers must immediately use Apple’s sandbox testing environment to validate these APIs in their apps. For any developers out there finding this to be inconvenient, get used to it. Other regions, such as Utah, Louisiana, and Brazil, are looking at, or have implemented, similar rules.
    • They should show the onedrive recycle bin in a searchable manner and on app not just on the website
    • You looking at a phone or something? On my 4K HDR monitor it is frikking spectacular.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      230
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      61
    5. 5
      neufuse
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!