Make your Vista's admin account acts like in XP


Recommended Posts

Thanks for the tip!

Unfortunately I jumped the gun and didn't read the entire thread and went ahead and created a new Admin Account but preferred it when Vista would boot up and load straight away (without picking an account). My newbie question is how do I delete the *new* Admin account..? I have tried to do it and the option is not there. :blink: I can delete my old Admin Account but would rather not.

Thanks in advance!

Thanks for the tip!

Unfortunately I jumped the gun and didn't read the entire thread and went ahead and created a new Admin Account but preferred it when Vista would boot up and load straight away (without picking an account). My newbie question is how do I delete the *new* Admin account..? I have tried to do it and the option is not there. :blink: I can delete my old Admin Account but would rather not.

Thanks in advance!

As far as I know you can't delete the new admin account since it's the main computer adminstrator, the only way to enjoy the XP's admin experience AND in the same time the straight login, is by deleting your old admin account.

If you want to revert everything as it was, you just revert the steps you did " bu setting disabled to enabled etc".

As far as I know you can't delete the new admin account since it's the main computer adminstrator, the only way to enjoy the XP's admin experience AND in the same time the straight login, is by deleting your old admin account.

If you want to revert everything as it was, you just revert the steps you did " bu setting disabled to enabled etc".

Thanks again! This solved my problem...You're great!! :)

You're welcome Hypnautica!

And the big news: The guide has been updated to provide the required steps for Vista Home Basic/Home Premium! Enjoy ;)

is not being in administrator account 24/7 really that bothersome? I know the UAC is with no doubt but I haven't had very many issues so far.

I don't really know if this would be the best solution though, surely there is a way of enabling this type of functionality to any account that is a member of administrator via Manage?

I just found this on Microsoft Technet

The built-in Administrator account, by default, cannot log on to the computer in safe mode. Please see the following sections for more information.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows...a/aa906022.aspx

MrFujim it seems you didn't read the first post ;) , as I clearly stated...

We know UAC feature in Windows Vista, and we all know how to disable it, this is not the purpose of this thread, because even after you disable UAC, you'll have other prompts about folder/file permissions errors sometimes (I faced it in strange, unexpected occasions, like deleting an empty folder for a program left by the uninstaller), or you'll need to right click and select "Run as Administrator" for most applications to work/install correctly.

After this method, we're restoring the exact functionality of XP's administrator account to Vista, UAC will not prompts for anything even if it's left ON, because your administrator account will be in control for everything and elevated by default (as in XP).

MrFujim it seems you didn't read the first post ;) , as I clearly stated...

After this method, we're restoring the exact functionality of XP's administrator account to Vista, UAC will not prompts for anything even if it's left ON, because your administrator account will be in control for everything and elevated by default (as in XP).

Woops... *cough* *cough*

Well, ehm, nevermind ;)

Thank you thank you thank you thank you x infinity.

I won't be upgrading my desktop to Vista for quite a while (the benefits of it that I would use don't justify it's price to me. Plus I'll wait for other people to test it). Not to mention I can't imagine torturing my beautifully built PC with it. :)

However, I got a laptop today. And it came with Vista Home. After tweaking it a while, installing programs on it and getting quite irritated that some things wouldn't install or work even with run as Administrator and UVAC turned off. I remembered this guide I read earlier. So now I'm running it as the real admin and I have to redo everything again. -_-. But at least the things irritating me before when it was giving me problems aren't anymore. :)

On a sidenote. I wish you could build laptops.. this Vaio came with so much junk installed -_-. I'd buy a bare bones one but my dad wanted one where he could pay it off in a monthly plan with no interest for a certain amount of time.

Of course the majority of security experts assume the user doesn't know what he/she is doing. True it's better to run as a limited user. Though I disliked being hassled or taking an extra step in getting my desktop or laptop to do what I want it to do.

I do run as a limited user in Linux however, and that's simply because in Linux I do alot of tweaking and messing around. Which normally means I can screw something up. But for Windows computers, the damage I could do is pretty minor. And as for security threats. Well last time I was infected with anything was back in the 1990s. And that's because I was a kid, playing a game and not knowing alot about computers. And someone sent me a trojan just so they could get into that account.

Much more wiser now.

This is exactly what I thought...

Seems like some people always need to complain, XP was not save becouse you work as administrator, now they solved that issue and now they are complaining again!

Microsoft has build in this feature not to attack their users but to defend them, so those people who do work as administrator in Vista all day long shouldn't complain about Windows as soon they got malware and stuff on their computer.

I'm also not too happy with the UAC, its quite anoying when you want to cleanup your start/programs, but if this helps to keep the OS clean and stabil i'm happy.

God this is like saying you want to always run as ROOT in linux 24/7.

Something that about 100% of security experts will tell you to NEVER do.

Make your Vista's admin account acts like in XP, Always in full control

Funny that made me laugh.

Make your Vista's admin account acts like in XP, You and Virus attacks are Always in full control.

In XP I used to run as Limited User. It was a pain to create batch files and various tools to get Limited User to perform some tasks as Admin. With UAC in Vista all this trouble is gone. Whenever Admin access is required it just pops up.

controluserpasswords2vigv6.jpg

I have also enabled Administrator account from Computer Management

administratorenablevistxp5.th.jpg

which is another way to enable Administrator account in Vista/XP.

Edited by McoreD
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!