Make your Vista's admin account acts like in XP


Recommended Posts

Wonderful guide.

Curious though, is there any way to remove the "run as administrator" function on context menus, since there's no longer any use for it(Or is there)?

If It involves resource hacking, it doesn't matter. I want to leave my Vista 'un-hacked'. >.>

@bradavon: I still can't figure out how to do that too. I added the bit about IE7 to the first post, I didn't notice it since I don't use IE :D thanks a lot.

@neospyce: Thanks for the link!

@Sniper101 & jamesyfx: You're welcome! :) I don't think there's a way to remove "Run as admin", but if you found a way let us know ;)

Wonderful guide.

Curious though, is there any way to remove the "run as administrator" function on context menus, since there's no longer any use for it(Or is there)?

If It involves resource hacking, it doesn't matter. I want to leave my Vista 'un-hacked'. >.>

Merge "RunAsAdmin_Exe-.reg" to remove the "Run as Administrator" Context Menu Item from all exe files.

Merge "RunAsAdmin_Exe+.reg" if you want to restore the "Run as Administrator" Context Menu Item.

RunAsAdmin.zip

I created these regfiles for the Take Ownership Context Menu Item.

? ? TakeOwn.png

More info @ Vista - Tips, Tricks & Tweaks:):)

Merge "RunAsAdmin_Exe-.reg" to remove the "Run as Administrator" Context Menu Item from all exe files.

Merge "RunAsAdmin_Exe+.reg" if you want to restore the "Run as Administrator" Context Menu Item.

RunAsAdmin.zip

I created these regfiles for the Take Ownership Context Menu Item.

TakeOwn.png

More info @ Vista - Tips, Tricks & Tweaks. :)

Sweet.

Heres a nice little tool:

http://www.tweak-uac.com/

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
@bradavon: I still can't figure out how to do that too. I added the bit about IE7 to the first post, I didn't notice it since I don't use IE :D thanks a lot.

No worries, glad I could help. If you like you can delete my ramblings above the main point of my post. The important part is when I discuss DropMyRights.

I too don't use IE but on occasion you have to when the site isn't FF compatible, or the you come across the odd site that uses ActiveX.

Is there a way to REVERSE this ?

I must admit, I've rarely used the "Administrator" log in, and only then by accident.

I'd like to go straight to my Phil K account.

How do I get shot of this ?

Yes there's!

1- Click Start, and type "cmd" in the search area, right click on "Command Prompt" and select 'Run as Administrator".

2- In the command prompt type "net users Administrator /active:no" (Note the capital "A" in Administrator) and press Enter, you will get a confirmation as "The command completed successfully".

Reboot and it'll go to the active account directly :)

Welcome everyone.

Yes there's!

1- Click Start, and type "cmd" in the search area, right click on "Command Prompt" and select 'Run as Administrator".

2- In the command prompt type "net users Administrator /active:no" (Note the capital "A" in Administrator) and press Enter, you will get a confirmation as "The command completed successfully".

Reboot and it'll go to the active account directly :)

Welcome everyone.

Cool. New little bit there.

Yes there's!

1- Click Start, and type "cmd" in the search area, right click on "Command Prompt" and select 'Run as Administrator".

2- In the command prompt type "net users Administrator /active:no" (Note the capital "A" in Administrator) and press Enter, you will get a confirmation as "The command completed successfully".

Reboot and it'll go to the active account directly :)

Welcome everyone.

Worked beautifully.

Thanks !

  • 1 month later...
maybe someone could post some reg tweaks for the above keys, so that we can just copy and paste them into notepad and save them as .reg files, would be very handy:)!

I know that the point of this tutorial is to move the annoying messages that warn you about almost every top level action you attempt, but after careful consideration, I think it's a good idea to be warned. Windows XP (mostly before SP2), was a completely in-secure file system with regards to administrative permissions. User accounts in both the Home and Professional editions of Windows XP were by default given administrative permissions over the system they presided in.

I think Microsoft has made a smart move by ensuring that users aren't able to harm them-selves. I understand there are those of you out there who are obviously careful and cautious enough to be able to take care of yourselves, but the majority is often the dumber fraction. ;)

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hey :)

This doesnt seem to work very well. Everytime I try to copy and then paste something in Program Files it never allows me even if I say yes to the UAC prompt. While in my original admin account when I installed Vista, I could.

Why?

  • 8 months later...
Hello Tantawi, thanks for the welcome.

Thanks for that reg fix. It looks like it adds a context menu which dumps you at a DOS command prompt. It's a start but I'd prefer a Full Admin account like XP.

Even if I didn't use it all the time it would be nice to know it's possible. For example I've not worked out how to be able to rename files in the WINDOWS\SYSTEM32 folder (unless I take ownership of that too) which you may need to do if you need to delete/rename a system file.

Has anyone worked how to do this? Surely it's possible. I believe the difference here is the Administrator account (the proper one) in Vista still doesn't own certain folders, they're owned by the SYSTEM account (which cannot logged in with) as opposed XP where you own each and every folder.

That thread is great though, it's chocker block with goodies. I'll have to get reading :D

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can I suggest you add a disclaimer to your first post explaining disabling UAC takes Vista's IE7 Protected Mode with it.

This basically lowers IE7 to a Limited User (lower than the Semi-Admin you're logged in with). This is something IE7 users may not be aware of, even if you enable Protected Mode from Internet Options it stays disabled (just like UAC). There is a fix however.

If you want UAC disabled but Protected Mode on use DropMyRights which was written for XP but works just the same in Vista (I tested it last night), not only that but using it actually turns Protected Mode back on (i.e - instead of saying Protected Mode: Off it will say On). Therefore proving Protected Mode and DropMyRights are on and the same thing.

What is DropMyRights I hear you say, read on: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms972827.aspx

It was written by a Microsoft bloke but isn't officially supported. I use the /c switch to make it even more secure. I've been using it for months and bar ActiveX installs (which need admin rights) not one website has fallen over. You can prove it works by trying to save a file into the SYSTEM32 folder, it won't let you.

The great thing is it's completely seamless, works on XP or Vista (probably 2000 too) and lets you get the good bits out of UAC without the bad. Just set the shortcut for each Internet enabled program to use it and make sure you choose Open "Minimised" and it's seamless.

I tried this but it always gives me a invalid path....

it says C:\programs doesnt exist.

  • 2 weeks later...

yeah currently I use a real admin account with no UAC at all however I think UAC is a good idea as it follows the unix motto of trying to keep things running in limited priviledge mode. So I do plan at some point to move back to a UAC environment on my vista box and work around the non admin mode problems I had.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Digisecret 2.1.431 Pro and Wzipse 4.0. Both are encrypted self-extracting archives.
    • Google reshuffles its AI coding team as it struggles to catch Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is already reorganizing the AI coding “strike team” it created roughly two months ago, as it attempts to find ways to close the gap with Anthropic in one of generative AI’s most commercially important areas. According to The Information, Google DeepMind is expanding the team’s focus to include “midtraining,” rather than concentrating only on coding tools and agents. Midtraining takes place after a model’s broad initial training but before the final stages that prepare it to follow instructions and perform specific tasks. In simple terms, it gives developers another opportunity to expose a model to carefully selected data before it is polished for release. That could help Google improve Gemini’s underlying coding abilities instead of relying only on better prompts, interfaces, or post-training. Previous research has found that midtraining can be particularly effective for code and mathematics, where models must move from general language knowledge to more structured tasks. Google reportedly created the original strike team in April. It was led by Google DeepMind research engineer Sebastian Borgeaud, who previously worked on model pretraining, and focused on complex, long-running programming jobs. Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Google DeepMind chief technology officer Koray Kavukcuoglu were also reportedly involved in the effort. DeepMind researchers were said to believe that Anthropic’s coding tools were outperforming Google’s Gemini models, prompting the company to give the project more attention. Anthropic has made coding a central part of its AI strategy through Claude Code and its Claude model family. The company has continued improving that area, with Claude Opus 4.8 offering upgrades for coding and other agentic tasks, along with the now-unavailable Mythos and Fable models. The reshuffle also comes at a time when Google faces increased competition for AI researchers. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer recently announced that he was leaving Google for OpenAI, while two other researchers who contributed to Gemini and DeepMind projects are reportedly preparing to join Anthropic. It remains unclear whether the reorganized team will produce a new public Gemini model or developer product. No release date, team size, or specific performance target has been disclosed. Source: The Information
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      413
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!