When It Comes To Broadband, U.S. Plays Follow The Leader


 Share

Recommended Posts

Broadband access in the United States continues to grow at an impressive rate, from 60 million users in March 2005 to 84 million in March 2006, according to the Pew Internet & American Life Project. As-yet unpublished survey data gathered by Pew in December 2006 shows that 45% of respondents now report broadband access at home.

Despite these compelling growth statistics, the reality isn't quite so rosy, especially when comparing broadband progress in the United States with other industrialized countries.

According to a study by U.K.-based Point Topic, as of the third quarter in 2006, the United States led the world in total number of broadband lines installed with 54.5 million lines, followed by China with 48.6 million. The same Point Topic report, however, indicates that broadband growth rates are much higher in other countries -- for example, China is now projected to surpass the U.S. in total broadband lines within 2007, given current trends. And the total number of broadband lines, while a useful figure for some purposes, isn't the most meaningful statistic for measuring how common and widespread access really is, or to compare broadband progress relative to other nations.

For these judgments, metrics based on per-capita household penetration provide a clearer picture. For instance, it's inevitable that, due to its vastly higher population, China will surpass the U.S. in total number of broadband lines, even if the percentage of people in China with broadband lines stays quite small and access is restricted largely to affluent urban areas.

Looking at the more representative measurement of the percentage of those who have access to broadband connectivity, the United States isn't even in the top 10 countries, various studies indicate. President George W. Bush admitted back in 2004 that while broadband use had tripled over the previous four years, the U.S. then ranked 10th among industrialized nations for broadband availability, and he added, "Tenth is 10 spots too low, as far as I'm concerned." Now almost three years later, how much progress have we made, and where do we stand?

Playing The Numbers Game

There are a variety of data points related to broadband penetration in the United States. One thing on which they all agree: the U.S. is far from being in the lead.

The United States currently ranks 12th in broadband adoption rates, significantly down from its ranking of fourth in 2001, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, a 30 member-nation group committed to the development of democratic governments and market economies.

The International Telecommunications Union lists the U.S. as 21st worldwide for broadband penetration rate in 2005. Point Topic shows the United States is in 20th place by number of households with broadband access and in 19th by individual broadband access. Those ranks have been falling, not rising, in recent quarters.

And even the good news isn't that good. Some of the more positive data that has been reported is questionable, such as figures presented in a letter written by FCC Chairman Kevin Martin in 2005 and published in The Wall Street Journal, showing what seems to be tremendous growth in U.S. broadband access.

The July, 2005, FCC report that he was citing, which promoted and defended the state of broadband access in the U.S., has received pointed criticism for defining a "high-speed" line as one delivering service of at least 200 Kbps in at least one direction, and for defining a ZIP code as "covered" by broadband access even if just a single broadband line is active in that region. It is true that 200 Kbps was, even in 2005, a minimal definition of "broadband," but it's a level that's largely inadequate for delivering much of what is commonly accepted as "broadband-level service," such as streaming video and swift downloads of large files. It seems clear that measuring "broadband access" by even the relatively modest speeds of 1Mbps or higher would drastically cut the estimate of U.S. broadband penetration.

book_go.pngREAD MORE

link_go.pngSOURCE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon is doing their part, albeit rather slowly.

Once they get all their fiber lines down for FIOS like they plan, then we will really see an explosion of broadband. Cable suppliers will FINALLY have an incentive to supply more bandwidth, most importantly that of UPSTREAM bandwidth.

Most of our low numbers is due to politics...where the hell else is "NET NEUTRALITY" discussed in the world?

Then you have to figure in prices. Comcast for as LOW as $43USD/month? Are u kidding me? Hey Im paying that for my Comcast like everyone else on the service, but I think its a joke that its so much and Comcast admitted to me that they are holding back on bandwidth distribution to their customers unless the market demands it (literal translation: you won't see significant upgrades until FIOS reaches your area, sorry). The cheapest broadband option is Verizon at $15 for a junky 768kbps download connection...and there is a chance you wont even be able to get that if you are too far from the telephone company.

I know that broadband adoption isnt exactly as serious an issue as GLOBAL WARMING, but if the government is interested in improving their numbers, they need to do two things:

1) federal funding for Verizon's work...

2) antitrust cases against the cable companies for their absolute monopoly...

Since neither is happening, enjoy your victory countries of the third world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we need a boost in speed!!

Tell that to the senators and corporate CEO's of Internet companies. They want as much profit using the least amount of bandwidth necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.