Vista price petition pops up on Government site


Recommended Posts

You also realize that electronics are MUCH cheaper in Japan and South Korea than in the US? Welcome to the global market people. Do realize that the UK has benefits that most Americans in the US would envy. We DO get shafted in other areas.

But have you seen the reason Mr gates has given for the price difference.

I can understand price differences, yes. Its annoying, but its a fact of life. But when a company makes such a crappy excuse, then that does really irratate me.

just fyi, Mr gates has said in an interview, the reason for the price differences is because MS had lost track of currancy values. Now to me, thats BS. What is the point of even saying that, when everyone knows that is not the case.

It's markets nothing more, if Tony puts more Preasure on Microsoft in the UK Microsofts Board of directors can just say well cya were pulling out.

Watch the Markets in the London Stock exchange and also the New York stock exchange you will see there is a big difference between the US Markets and the UK's Markets.

...

just fyi, Mr gates has said in an interview, the reason for the price differences is because MS had lost track of currancy values. Now to me, thats BS. What is the point of even saying that, when everyone knows that is not the case.

Well, it probably has been several decades since Mr. Gates has had personal contact with this "currency" of which you speak. :p
Signed. Although the OEM prices are quite good...

Sentiment shared.

Happily signed. Now let's start placing bets on how long it takes Mr. Tony 'Failure' Blair to deny our wishes and email us all saying it's for "The greater good" or some other complete Nonsense!

Why don't they just force Microsoft to separate the OS from it's main monopoly making applications? I'd love to buy Vista and then buy whatever I want like Media Player, Messenger, Internet Explorer, Movie Maker, Windows Mail etc.

Artificial constraints like 3 programs at a time is indicative of a monopoly.

Some argue "How are we going to download anything???" well what if MS bundled an internet connection with the OS, same argument.

The result per above would be other software companies would have an immensively greater chance at getting revenue in the browser and media player market and they could have much better software and software in stores. When was the last time you saw a media player software box in a store, and how long will it take before PowerDVD and WinDVD would give up ghost as Vista is capable of playing back CSS enctrypted DVD files?

1. remove and prevent Microsoft from bundling major apps with Windows

2. prevent Microsoft from giving out the software "Free" by either a download link, windows update, or a security update (IE 7!!!)

3. prevent Microsoft from selling the software online with any extra conviniency like through Windows Update, One-Care or Live login site

4. force them to sell the apps at reasonable research/development cost like everybody else

These suggested rules may sound fierce, but it would be necessary for other software comanies to have an 100% equal chance. Finally these software companies might get big enough and decide to release their apps to other platforms, thus weakening Microsofts stranglehold on the home computer platform further.

Linux and MacOS X bundles major apps too, but they don't have >50% market share. Though I don't trust Apple one bit more then MS.

You should be able to buy a browser over a counter, it's the most used application on a home computer.

I've been thinking about this and belive I've covered all the arguments.

...

1. remove and prevent Microsoft from bundling major apps with Windows

2. prevent Microsoft from giving out the software "Free" by either a download link, windows update, or a security update (IE 7!!!)

3. prevent Microsoft from selling the software online with any extra conviniency like through Windows Update, One-Care or Live login site

4. force them to sell the apps at reasonable research/development cost like everybody else

...

I am a 100% Linux user, and I disagree with your proposed restrictions. I do think that it would be best if Microsoft would make their OS more modular (I think they have mentioned that this is their direction for the future), so that users can elect to install Firefox instead of IE (not just 'in addition to'). And, having the computer use the Microsoft Update online service (or something similar) to make these selections actually makes sense - whether for free or for a fee.

But I disagree with these restrictions, as written.

...Linux and MacOS X bundles major apps too, but they don't have >50% market share. Though I don't trust Apple one bit more then MS.
For Linux, the point I would make that everything (outside the kernel and the GNU OS you have to install) is entirely optional. Marketshare is a non-issue with Linux. I am not familiar with Apple's products, outside playing with OSX for about 60 seconds in the computer store.
You also realize that electronics are MUCH cheaper in Japan and South Korea than in the US? Welcome to the global market people. Do realize that the UK has benefits that most Americans in the US would envy. We DO get shafted in other areas.

I'm curious, in what ways do Americans get shafted price-wise?

"Gas" costs on average $2.90/US Gallon over there. Costs about 89p/Litre here. After a bit of converting;

1 US Gallon = 3.785 Litres

3.785 * 89p = ?3.36 ish

So, you guys pay about ?1.45 a US Gallon, we pay ?3.36 a US Gallon.

A Xbox 360 game (CoD 3) is $58 (about ?29) whereas it costs ?37.98 here (and that's in a sale!)

The example of Vista (the purpose of this thread).

30GB iPod Video (black) in the US is $240 (?120~) in the US, it's ?189 in the UK.

I can't be bothered to find any more examples, but you get my point. I live in rip-off Britain.

I think MS is compensating for the inflated egos of Europeans in general. I'm suprised Canadians aren't charged more too for the same reason.....(runs an hides) :shiftyninja: .

I'm curious, in what ways do Americans get shafted price-wise?

....

I can't be bothered to find any more examples, but you get my point. I live in rip-off Britain.

and the PS3. 4 months later, and about double the price compared to japan, and ?125 more expensive than the USA. And we don't get the option of the cheaper version.

Well... let's not forget that because of the EU, which the UK is part of, Microsoft was forced to sell some retard version of XP, XP:N or whatever it was called, and due to those courts Microsoft was sued for hundreds of millions of dollars...

IMO, if I was Microsoft I would charge those countries more, hell, if they're going to sue us, yet they still want to buy our software, make them pay more. Maybe if all those little companies would stop bit**ing about MS software, and if the EU courts would stop accepting those retarded complaints it wouldn't be so damn expensive.

Well... let's not forget that because of the EU, which the UK is part of, Microsoft was forced to sell some retard version of XP, XP:N or whatever it was called, and due to those courts Microsoft was sued for hundreds of millions of dollars...

IMO, if I was Microsoft I would charge those countries more, hell, if they're going to sue us, yet they still want to buy our software, make them pay more. Maybe if all those little companies would stop bit**ing about MS software, it wouldn't be so damn expensive.

good point, forgot about that.

Well... let's not forget that because of the EU, which the UK is part of, Microsoft was forced to sell some retard version of XP, XP:N or whatever it was called, and due to those courts Microsoft was sued for hundreds of millions of dollars...

IMO, if I was Microsoft I would charge those countries more, hell, if they're going to sue us, yet they still want to buy our software, make them pay more. Maybe if all those little companies would stop bit**ing about MS software, and if the EU courts would stop accepting those retarded complaints it wouldn't be so damn expensive.

:rofl: Like that doesn't embody exactly the kind of abuse that Anti-Monopoly laws are designed to prevent!

Well... let's not forget that because of the EU, which the UK is part of, Microsoft was forced to sell some retard version of XP, XP:N or whatever it was called, and due to those courts Microsoft was sued for hundreds of millions of dollars...

IMO, if I was Microsoft I would charge those countries more, hell, if they're going to sue us, yet they still want to buy our software, make them pay more. Maybe if all those little companies would stop bit**ing about MS software, and if the EU courts would stop accepting those retarded complaints it wouldn't be so damn expensive.

Yeah, that's right. Microsoft screw over the little people who buy their software to get back at the EU...I'm sure the EU care :p

Its the price you pay for a version of Windows without Windows Media Player.

You want US prices? Put Windows Media Player back in.

edit:

You dont really see Real Networks or Apple complaining over MS with WMP. Thats mainly due to the fact that Real Networks and Apple have their own proprietary media formats which arent supported in WMP, which require the use to actually use their products.

WMP wasnt something designed to monopolize the market. It was designed to be a free media playing solution for people who had no idea that such capabilities existed. Before WMP7, WMP was just a simple video and audio player. WMP7 and beyond took cues from other programs with media library and visualizations and such.

Its the price you pay for a version of Windows without Windows Media Player.

You want US prices? Put Windows Media Player back in.

If it was up to the people, the Microsoft wouldn't have needed to take WMP out.

And anyway, in the UK, XP/Vista both come with WMP....so I, to be honest, have no idea what you lot are on about :p

If it was up to the people, the Microsoft wouldn't have needed to take WMP out.

And anyway, in the UK, XP/Vista both come with WMP....so I, to be honest, have no idea what you lot are on about :p

Just read one of the previous posts.

The removal of WMP came at a price...court prices and all that crap.

I mean its not written fact, but its a good guess that MS is trying to make up for all that lost money over the court cases and labor to make a WMP-free version of Vista AND XP.

I don't think Microsoft is doing it out of spite, after all, a lower price is a greater incentive to purchase the product. If Vista is going to be cheaper, the EU/England with have to make up the difference themselves.

BTW who thinks that the EU will make another fuss over Vista for no reason and start fining them again?

Ahh the price of importing...

We pay top dollar for clothing over here...I bring that up because I was watching some program on one of the local news networks and they did a story about India and they have local towns which house these companies which specialize in just one product which we import. And over there, local residents buy the stuff that we buy at $50-$100 for almost nothing.

There are towns just for BELTS...just for TIES. And you should see these places. We pay top dollar for small things like belts and ties...and they can get them for under a buck.

The price of importing...and capitalism.

Its not the EU's or our fault that Microsoft products are made in the US.

Just read one of the previous posts.

The removal of WMP came at a price...court prices and all that crap.

I mean its not written fact, but its a good guess that MS is trying to make up for all that lost money over the court cases and labor to make a WMP-free version of Vista AND XP.

The rest of Europe got the N versions of windows. The UK didn't. We have the same full version that the US have. So, back to the point of the petition, why are people in Britain getting ripped off? We have nothing to do with the N versions here.

Ripoff France, Germany, Belgium etc, just not lil ol' Britain :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This and Crazy Taxi are the two games that interested me the most from this showcase.
    • Good, because the nonstop chattering from the voices in her head made me quit the second game.
    • This new cabinet design lets you run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia PCs inside one case by Sayan Sen At Computex 2026 earlier this month, AMD announced a couple of new X3D processors for both sockets AM4 and AM5 as it confirmed the support extension of the latter till 2029. And although Intel didn't unveil any new desktop chips, the company's Core Ultra 200S Plus series is relatively new too. Let's say though that you want the best of both worlds simultaneously, and instead of running two different systems, you can have both running together side-by-side, or rather on top of one another. That's exactly what Thermaltake's CAPO X dual system is made for doing. While it's not exactly mandatory to run AMD with Intel, or vice versa, you get the idea. As you can see in the render above, it is essentially like a double-decker PC case that is capable of holding two microATX (mATX) motherboards. Even running just one discrete graphics card in a PC can get toasty, so you may be wondering how well the cooling is designed on the CAPO X, Thermaltake has confirmed, as is evident from the marketing promo image above, that the case supports up to two 360 mm AIO liquid coolers. 420mm is not supported. In total there is room for 13 120mm case fans. In terms of I/O (input/output) options for the two systems, there are naturally two places for those ports, one at the top and one at the very bottom of the chassis in the front panel. In terms of use cases, there are many possibilities. Thermaltake itself, for example, highlights how one system can be your main PC while the other could be the AI agent PC. Another example given is how it can be used to stream and game simultaneously with dedicated systems instead of hogging one with the entire load. Nothing regarding pricing or availability was said. Source: Thermaltake (YouTube, X)
    • There might be some passive design improvements (cooling, etc), but I doubt they'd change the core performance spec of the hardware mid-generation when they've already got a new console in development.
    • State of Decay 3 is out in 2027, reveals Plague Nests with new co-op gameplay trailer by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A few months ago, Undead Labs broke its silence about the third entry in the State of Decay series since its announcement in 2020. Today, the studio had a brand-new trailer to reveal at the Xbox Games Showcase, finally giving players a look at the Unreal Engine 5-powered title. A broad 2027 release window is now attached to State of Decay 3 too. The studio confirmed that every scene seen in the gameplay trailer (except for the studio logo) released today is from the game with no cinematic footage. "The quality bar of the moment-to-moment experience is higher than anything we’ve achieved in Undead Labs’ history," says the studio. "State of Decay 3 is being built in Unreal Engine 5, and we’re creating better quality versions of what makes our game the survival sandbox it is, and the combat experience is really, really important to us, and I think you can see it coming through in this trailer." One new aspect of this upcoming entry is the Plague Nests. These are supposed to be dynamic, dungeon‑like enemy hubs with varied “personas” that change tactics each time one appears on a map. These areas will have the best loot in the game for players brave enough to tackle them. The combat system is being overhauled too, letting players do quick and power attacks depending on the situation. This isn't just on the player's side though, as zombies themselves now have multiple new types of behaviors depending on how fresh or decayed they are. "All of these play very differently, especially as you start getting outnumbered or when you’re making noise and running around and trying to save your rear end or the rear end of your friend next to you," adds the developer. Of course, settlement building and community management are massive parts of this third entry too. These are being further expanded with the cooperative focus, giving players much more freedom for playing together than in State of Decay 2. Players will even be able to split up and build settlements in different areas of the same map with different goals. Undead Labs confirmed that playtests are already ongoing for the title, and interested players can sign up to participate by heading over here once more slots open up ahead of the full release. State of Decay 3 is coming out on PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Game Pass sometime in 2027.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      68
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!