Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
true, look at the first bulids of vista. the 3xxx bulids. They had the same look and fell as XP.

Many sources have said that Windows Seven will be built from the ground up, a new thing, while other sources say its not going to be like Windows Vista, wanna know something, they said that about Windows XP and about all the other versions too. I believe it will be built from the ground up, its just time, who wants files, icons, anything, from like 1995? :blink: Now if it was completely new, then its good... I gotta say that Windows Vista is awesome, so customizable, but when it comes to technology, Mac OS X wins because of its reliability, simplicity, and because you don't just find old icons lying around (well I didn't) and it just screams built from the ground up, but it isn't. The simplicity in Mac OS X comes from the reliable platform, newbies use Macs for MySpace and then it comes just people wanting work done, they use them for productivity, they aren't the people wanting to go into the computer, its usually an iMac, and, well, how do you open it, so you gotta send it in and thats not fun. Now there are computers that are PCs that are designed for simplicity

<----TO BE CONTINUED---->

Many sources have said that Windows Seven will be built from the ground up, a new thing, while other sources say its not going to be like Windows Vista, wanna know something, they said that about Windows XP and about all the other versions too.

No version of Windows will be completely built from the ground up. Often they will start with a clean slate, but that slate is usually the kernel (and stacks - audio, network, video) from the previous release.

Microsoft's not going to do away with hundred billion dollars of research just so they don't have any old icons in the new Windows only because you, me and a few people in the world cares.

No version of Windows will be completely built from the ground up. Often they will start with a clean slate, but that slate is usually the kernel (and stacks - audio, network, video) from the previous release.

Microsoft's not going to do away with hundred billion dollars of research just so they don't have any old icons in the new Windows only because you, me and a few people in the world cares.

Well with vista all the (and stacks - audio, network, video) have been built from the ground up and a large amount of the 2k3 kernel has been revamped and undergone many changes. Windows 7 will be based on the current under the hood changes vista has and all the new Tools Microsoft has. the only real differences is that when vienna is out the under the hood stuff running it will be enhanced versions of what we have now in vista.

wow i remember this thread. we're all still talking about the pic on page 1 right?

I think it's real, except the dock looking thing probably won't magnify like on OS X. The icons are going to animate when you mouse over them. I JEST I JEST!

I'd like for Windows 7 to include an integration for Soapbox/WLM/Spaces/live.com right on the desktop! That would take care of your news, connectivity, networking and conversation needs! :)

Not always...

Any hypothetical builds at this point would probably look the same anyway.

Exactly, look at Vista once XP was done. It had the same look.

I guess MS builds on the current OS and edits certain things, and revamps.

While some things are completely re-rewritten and added.

I can't beleave this topic is still going. It's fake guys, it's way too early for MS to be working on the next UI for Windows. They have to finish Longhorn Server, SP1 for Vista, SP3 for XP, and then, when we're deep into beta 2 or 3 of the next Windows version will they spring a new UI on us. Vistas final UI didn't show up until late in the Beta/CTP program.

i think its fake.

otherwise, all the folks at microsoft must be... stupid. i mean... if thats real and they really are about to do this that way... dont they see that EVERYONE of the mac community will hate microsoft even more and the press will bash them for that obvious leaking?

and because i dont think the folks at microsoft are stupid (listen up, although im a mac faboy i dont say they are stupid!! ;) ) i believe its fake.

Why anyone would think this is real is beyond me.

:rolleyes:

Of course it's FAKE! Someone has an overactive imagination. Virtually every previous version of Windows when it's been in development has looked exactly like the previous one when in development mere months after the previous one has been released (if it's being coded at all). The UI only changes significantly a few years later.

Move along, nothing to see here.

:blink: why do you all keep posting in here isnt 60 odd posts saying fake good enough? Until Microsoft release or leak some shots of the OS let it be.

Either way Vienna's first build will be on longhorn/vista's kernal and theme etc soooo.

Can't be, it's too soon after Vista - They can't seriously be starting another OS already ? Can they ?

Windows Seven was likely being created while Vista was wrapping up. OS' are started long before they are released to the public, so I don't doubt for a second MS is working on the next Windows OS. However I don't think they will be working as hard on it as they will in a few years. Also they need to wait for OSX Leopard to drop before they have any new features to add. ;)

  • 3 weeks later...
once more we see a modified os kernal to look just like os x. I know microsoft has some big plans for Vienna but not to copy the "dock", least I hope not...

It's kernel with an e. And that's not a kernel, it's a GUI. The kernel is the raw OS underneath all that that provides basic functions that actually tell the computer how to function, an example of which would be memory management.

let see, more filesystem support, ext3 and reiserfs for example. A boot loader that recognise other os. And the complete inability to install and/or use any software not package in a correcly build msi (aldo that's more for work, i'm so gonna kill adobe some days...)

Third party filesystem support will never happen. Bootloader might happen, but I doubt it's a priority. And the msi thing will never happen because that would break compatibility with 99% of what's out there, including current software.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!