Microsoft may face more EU fines


Recommended Posts

Microsoft warned of more EU fines

The European Commission has warned Microsoft that it could face further fines for failing to comply with its anti-trust rulings.

Brussels criticised the software giant for not changing its behaviour since it was fined 497m euros (?331m) in 2004.

In an escalation of its long-running battle with the US firm, Brussels said Microsoft had been seeking unreasonable prices from competitors for key data.

In response, Microsoft said the threat of further fines was unreasonable.

"In the 50 years of European antitrust policy, it's the first time we've been confronted with a company that has failed to comply with an antitrust decision," a Commission spokesman said.

The EU has sought to force Microsoft to disclose information that will allow other companies to make sure their software works properly with Microsoft's operating systems.

The latest move comes after the Commission not only fined the firm, but also ordered it to make a version of Windows available without Media Player software.

After its latest rebuke, Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said she was "not used to dealing with companies who drag their feet as Microsoft is doing".

"Microsoft is a company not used to losing."

But the firm said: "It is hard to see how the Commission can argue that even patented innovation must be made available for free."

Last year, Microsoft was told to pay daily fines adding up to 280.5 million euros over a six-month period, after it failed to adhere to the 2004 ruling.

Source: BBC News

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/542894-microsoft-may-face-more-eu-fines/
Share on other sites

seriously wtf do they want now? i mean they made versions of Vista available without the media player...oh yeah they dont' sell too well. what else are they expected to do? You can't seriously expect them to give away info for free that shouldn't be given for free, that's just crazy. everybody has licensing fees for certain areas.

These set of lawsuits are totally ridicolous. I just bought my macbook pro like 3 months ago and I fondly remeber me having itunes and quicktime asking me if I wanted it as my primary media player out of the box, I've done least 10 os x installs on different macs and they all ask the same deal, so why does microsoft deserve this? I mean apple does the same thing? Media players, web browser, picture software, the whole nine-yards?

Microsoft has the Choice now, either take the fines or do what every company with a brain does PULL OUT!!! then the EU can't do a damn thing. Im fed up hearing EU this and EU that you know what if i had the choice to change microsoft

The EU has sought to force Microsoft to disclose information that will allow other companies to make sure their software works properly with Microsoft's operating systems.

Last time I checked, just about every piece of software runs on Microsoft Windows. Other companies must be having a real tough time making their software work properly with Windows. :rolleyes:

Microsofts Windows is a global platform.. multi national businesses use it and I dont know if they really want incompatibilities.. but anyways.. all I gotta say is "**** YOU EU"

Microsoft should just donate all this fine money to the democrats or republicans and get US ambassadors to go to the EU and deal with this politically.. it works.

The EC is pathetic. They are getting rich off Microsoft because they know Microsoft has the money. They aren't chasing Apple, who preinstalls their own Calander, Address Book, Web Browser, and forces you to use iTunes to use an iPod. Why, because Apple has probably paid the EC off under the table. The EU needs to either a: dismantle the EC, or change what laws they can and can not pass. Next thing you know, you'll be forced to use 1-ply toiletpaper at home, because it's more economic ...

This is getting ridiculous, all they are doing is getting rich with microsoft's money.

The fines hardly have impact on the EU budget.

Microsoft has the Choice now, either take the fines or do what every company with a brain does PULL OUT!!! then the EU can't do a damn thing. Im fed up hearing EU this and EU that you know what if i had the choice to change microsoft

There's way more revenue coming from the EU than the fines are. It would be the dumbest decision ever made.

Basically what it boils down to is that the EC feel that Microsoft needs to be handicapped.

They're an anti-consumer organization, as demonstrated by the requirement to ship a version of Windows without Media Player - something that absolutely not one single user asked for. And further demonstrated by their attempts to thwart security in Windows by claiming that making Windows "too secure" is unfair to companies that produce security products. That's like going after Toyota because their hybrid cars are "unfair" to oil companies. Whatever happened to what's best for the ****ing customer?

Basically what it boils down to is that the EC feel that Microsoft needs to be handicapped.

They're an anti-consumer organization, as demonstrated by the requirement to ship a version of Windows without Media Player - something that absolutely not one single user asked for. And further demonstrated by their attempts to thwart security in Windows by claiming that making Windows "too secure" is unfair to companies that produce security products. That's like going after Toyota because their hybrid cars are "unfair" to oil companies. Whatever happened to what's best for the ****ing customer?

Ultimately competition is the best thing for customers. If a company has little competition, why would it be motivated to innovate? That said, I think the EC is a bit over-the-top in what it views as anti-competitive behavior.

Toyota doesn't have a monopoly on automobiles, so it's not a great comparison. If Canada Post (which arguably has a monopoly on mail delivery in Canada) started adding new services that compete with Purolator/FedEx, Purolator/FedEx would claim anti-competitive practices.

...They're an anti-consumer organization, as demonstrated by the requirement to ship a version of Windows without Media Player - something that absolutely not one single user asked for. ...

I want one without the bloat (ie. media player, IE, movie maker...)

And the people in Europe want to know why Vista costs more than in the US? Send your thank you notes to the EC

That has nothing to do with the EC, it's just the generally greedy attitude of MS - Windows and other MS products have always been much more expensive here in the EU, even before the anti-trust rulings!

Also, it's quite arrogant that you are trying to speak for everyone, Brandon, in claiming that there is no one who wouldn't want that Media Player crap. Even though MS is forcing the Media Player crap onto everyone installing XP or Vista, there is still quite an amount of people who don't want it - which is the reason why there is quite alot of other media players still, and also the reason for programs like nLite which lets people remove the unwanted Media Player.

If anyone is anti-consumer here, it's no one but MS as they're seriously stifling competition and thus prevent innovation. Just take a look at IE6 - MS didn't update it for many years as it had successfully eliminated any competition and thus prevented any new innovation from happening. Only with the recent rise of Firefox (and also Opera, to a smaller extent), MS was getting competition again and was thus forced to create an updated and improved IE - IE7. Without cmpetition, MS wouldn't have bothered to ever update IE6 anymore.

Edited by Chad
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!