Microsoft may face more EU fines


Recommended Posts

Microsoft warned of more EU fines

The European Commission has warned Microsoft that it could face further fines for failing to comply with its anti-trust rulings.

Brussels criticised the software giant for not changing its behaviour since it was fined 497m euros (?331m) in 2004.

In an escalation of its long-running battle with the US firm, Brussels said Microsoft had been seeking unreasonable prices from competitors for key data.

In response, Microsoft said the threat of further fines was unreasonable.

"In the 50 years of European antitrust policy, it's the first time we've been confronted with a company that has failed to comply with an antitrust decision," a Commission spokesman said.

The EU has sought to force Microsoft to disclose information that will allow other companies to make sure their software works properly with Microsoft's operating systems.

The latest move comes after the Commission not only fined the firm, but also ordered it to make a version of Windows available without Media Player software.

After its latest rebuke, Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said she was "not used to dealing with companies who drag their feet as Microsoft is doing".

"Microsoft is a company not used to losing."

But the firm said: "It is hard to see how the Commission can argue that even patented innovation must be made available for free."

Last year, Microsoft was told to pay daily fines adding up to 280.5 million euros over a six-month period, after it failed to adhere to the 2004 ruling.

Source: BBC News

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/542894-microsoft-may-face-more-eu-fines/
Share on other sites

seriously wtf do they want now? i mean they made versions of Vista available without the media player...oh yeah they dont' sell too well. what else are they expected to do? You can't seriously expect them to give away info for free that shouldn't be given for free, that's just crazy. everybody has licensing fees for certain areas.

These set of lawsuits are totally ridicolous. I just bought my macbook pro like 3 months ago and I fondly remeber me having itunes and quicktime asking me if I wanted it as my primary media player out of the box, I've done least 10 os x installs on different macs and they all ask the same deal, so why does microsoft deserve this? I mean apple does the same thing? Media players, web browser, picture software, the whole nine-yards?

Microsoft has the Choice now, either take the fines or do what every company with a brain does PULL OUT!!! then the EU can't do a damn thing. Im fed up hearing EU this and EU that you know what if i had the choice to change microsoft

The EU has sought to force Microsoft to disclose information that will allow other companies to make sure their software works properly with Microsoft's operating systems.

Last time I checked, just about every piece of software runs on Microsoft Windows. Other companies must be having a real tough time making their software work properly with Windows. :rolleyes:

Microsofts Windows is a global platform.. multi national businesses use it and I dont know if they really want incompatibilities.. but anyways.. all I gotta say is "**** YOU EU"

Microsoft should just donate all this fine money to the democrats or republicans and get US ambassadors to go to the EU and deal with this politically.. it works.

The EC is pathetic. They are getting rich off Microsoft because they know Microsoft has the money. They aren't chasing Apple, who preinstalls their own Calander, Address Book, Web Browser, and forces you to use iTunes to use an iPod. Why, because Apple has probably paid the EC off under the table. The EU needs to either a: dismantle the EC, or change what laws they can and can not pass. Next thing you know, you'll be forced to use 1-ply toiletpaper at home, because it's more economic ...

This is getting ridiculous, all they are doing is getting rich with microsoft's money.

The fines hardly have impact on the EU budget.

Microsoft has the Choice now, either take the fines or do what every company with a brain does PULL OUT!!! then the EU can't do a damn thing. Im fed up hearing EU this and EU that you know what if i had the choice to change microsoft

There's way more revenue coming from the EU than the fines are. It would be the dumbest decision ever made.

Basically what it boils down to is that the EC feel that Microsoft needs to be handicapped.

They're an anti-consumer organization, as demonstrated by the requirement to ship a version of Windows without Media Player - something that absolutely not one single user asked for. And further demonstrated by their attempts to thwart security in Windows by claiming that making Windows "too secure" is unfair to companies that produce security products. That's like going after Toyota because their hybrid cars are "unfair" to oil companies. Whatever happened to what's best for the ****ing customer?

Basically what it boils down to is that the EC feel that Microsoft needs to be handicapped.

They're an anti-consumer organization, as demonstrated by the requirement to ship a version of Windows without Media Player - something that absolutely not one single user asked for. And further demonstrated by their attempts to thwart security in Windows by claiming that making Windows "too secure" is unfair to companies that produce security products. That's like going after Toyota because their hybrid cars are "unfair" to oil companies. Whatever happened to what's best for the ****ing customer?

Ultimately competition is the best thing for customers. If a company has little competition, why would it be motivated to innovate? That said, I think the EC is a bit over-the-top in what it views as anti-competitive behavior.

Toyota doesn't have a monopoly on automobiles, so it's not a great comparison. If Canada Post (which arguably has a monopoly on mail delivery in Canada) started adding new services that compete with Purolator/FedEx, Purolator/FedEx would claim anti-competitive practices.

...They're an anti-consumer organization, as demonstrated by the requirement to ship a version of Windows without Media Player - something that absolutely not one single user asked for. ...

I want one without the bloat (ie. media player, IE, movie maker...)

And the people in Europe want to know why Vista costs more than in the US? Send your thank you notes to the EC

That has nothing to do with the EC, it's just the generally greedy attitude of MS - Windows and other MS products have always been much more expensive here in the EU, even before the anti-trust rulings!

Also, it's quite arrogant that you are trying to speak for everyone, Brandon, in claiming that there is no one who wouldn't want that Media Player crap. Even though MS is forcing the Media Player crap onto everyone installing XP or Vista, there is still quite an amount of people who don't want it - which is the reason why there is quite alot of other media players still, and also the reason for programs like nLite which lets people remove the unwanted Media Player.

If anyone is anti-consumer here, it's no one but MS as they're seriously stifling competition and thus prevent innovation. Just take a look at IE6 - MS didn't update it for many years as it had successfully eliminated any competition and thus prevented any new innovation from happening. Only with the recent rise of Firefox (and also Opera, to a smaller extent), MS was getting competition again and was thus forced to create an updated and improved IE - IE7. Without cmpetition, MS wouldn't have bothered to ever update IE6 anymore.

Edited by Chad
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All I want is a way to turn off the Copilot AI suggestion crap in OneDrive that doesn't break OneNote, etc. -- as the current Account setting change option does...
    • Here is the new Surface Laptop Ultra wallpaper in high resolution by Taras Buria Earlier this week, Microsoft announced the Surface Laptop Ultra, its brand-new high-end laptop powered by NVIDIA's brand-new RTX Spark processor. As usual, Microsoft gives each new device a unique wallpaper, and the Surface Laptop Ultra is no exception. While the device is not publicly available yet, somebody has already extracted its wallpaper, giving everyone a chance to get a piece of the upcoming laptop in its full-resolution glory. The Surface Laptop Ultra has a very dark, abstract wallpaper that resembles the stock wallpapers in Windows Server, albeit with much less color. Having this dark, grim wallpaper highlights the laptop's mini-LED display and its ability to cut off parts of the screen's backlight to achieve OLED-like black levels. However, if you also like light wallpapers, we made a white version by simply inverting its colors. You can download both wallpapers below (click the image, right-click it, and select "Save as"): The Surface Laptop Ultra is expected to launch later this year. Microsoft is not revealing full details yet, including the price. However, Microsoft confirmed up to 1 petaflop of AI performance and RTX 5070-level of GPU performance. The heart of the laptop has up to 20 CPU cores and 6,144 GPU cores. Additionally, Microsoft and NVIDIA boast high CPU efficiency for all-day battery life. As for the display, it is a 15-inch mini-LED display with a pixel density of 262 ppi and a maximum brightness of 2,000 nits. Of course, not everyone needs this amount of power, and certainly not everyone can afford it. For those who need a more affordable device, Microsoft is also preparing the next-generation Surface Pro powered by the Snapdragon X2 Elite processor. Weeks ahead of the announcement, details about this computer were leaked by a retailer. Do you like the Surface Laptop Ultra's stock wallpaper? Share your thoughts in the comments. Image provided by @nextgenos2026 on X
    • From all that I've read on the subject--not that much, really--it looks to me like companies and parents are trying to protect themselves from children using their parents accounts to run up giant bills, sometimes in the thousands of dollars, and the first the parents know about it is when they get sued... Internet companies have been sued for tailoring their ads to children, which is kind of old news. My belief is that policing starts at home with the parents, and the reason that so many laws that can't be enforced are being passed is because parents are eschewing their responsibilities, claiming not enough time, not enough knowledge, etc. Giving kids cell phones sans Internet connectivity is a good place to start--confine Internet activity to PCs in the home that the parents regulate. My kids are all grown and gone, I'm happy to say... They have their own kids to worry about.
    • ChartNet’s 1.7 million synthetic samples let compact open-source models outperform GPT-4o on every chart task   A team from MIT and the MIT-IBM Computing Research Lab has built a training dataset that solves one of the most persistent gaps in enterprise AI: the inability of even the best commercial models to reliably read a chart...... https://www.techtimes.com/articles/317752/20260604/ai-chart-understanding-breakthrough-mit-ibm-dataset-lets-small-models-beat-gpt-4o.htm  
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      475
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      233
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!