Watchmen! Rorschach Revealed.


Recommended Posts

We reported earlier today that Warner Bros. and Fox had filed a Notice of Settlement Status and were all set up to have a meeting in judges? chambers to go over the last remaining details of the settlement.

Now, we?re getting confirmation from IESB that the two studios have indeed settled. There are no details on dollar figures yet, but there are a few main points:

* On Friday, they will appear before Judge Feess to have the case dismissed

* Fox will be getting a hefty sum and a percentage of the film?s gross

* Fox will NOT have any ownership of the film and will NOT be the distributer of the film, meaning that

* Warner Bros. will retain full control of the movie and the distro

There?s really nothing surprising here. Fox is getting a sick amount of money - how sick we have yet to see - and will take some of the box office for a project they didn?t do anything for.

The best news is that Warner Bros. will retain the creative control over the film?s release. Judging by the comment sections and my email inbox, I know a lot of FSR readers were concerned that if Fox got some control, they?d stall the film or demand to recut it. Luckily, those nightmare scenarios have been avoided.

[Source]

Financial Details of Settlement Released

This past Thursday night we reported that Fox and Warner Brothers had reached a settlement over the Watchmen film. In the following 24 hours, details began to emerge about the specific financial terms of the settlement. These figures are a couple of days old, but here they are for those that want to know how big of a bite Fox really took out of the WB:

* According to Variety?s sources, Fox will receive an upfront payment totaling between $5 and $10 million, which will cover $1.4 million that the studio invested in development fees, plus millions of dollars in legal fees.

* As already mentioned, Fox will not be distributing the film, but under the terms of the settlement, will get gross participation of between 5% and 8.5% depending on the film?s worldwide revenues.

* The Hollywood Reporter, our source for the original settlement story, incorrectly reported that Fox would not be entitled to any rights for Watchmen spinoffs and sequels (they have since corrected the error). Fox will, in fact, participate as a gross player in any future Watchmen-related properties, although Snyder has already denied that he will participate in a prequel/sequel.

* Allegedly, other options for the settlement were discussed recently, according to Variety?s sources. These included moving WB?s Terminator Salvation release date from May 22nd, to avoid competing with Fox?s Night at the Museum 2: Battle of the Smithsonian. The studios have denied that these scenarios were ever evaluated.

All in all, for Fox, it seems the lawsuit was not a bad way to spend their time and money compared to some of the other ways they?ve been using it. The two studios released the following joint statement

Warner Bros. and Twentieth Century Fox have resolved their dispute regarding the rights to the upcoming motion picture Watchmen in a confidential settlement. Warner Bros acknowledges that Fox acted in good faith in bringing its claims, which were asserted prior to the start of principal photography. Fox acknowledges that Warner Bros. acted in good faith in defending against those claims Warner Bros. and Fox, like all Watchmen fans, look forward with great anticipation to this film?s March 6 release in theatres. theatres.

After this week, it finally looks like Watchmen fans can eagerly look forward to March 6 as well.

The pictures really awesome and stay true.

Btw this caught my attention from the previous Rappy post:

* The Hollywood Reporter, our source for the original settlement story, incorrectly reported that Fox would not be entitled to any rights for Watchmen spinoffs and sequels (they have since corrected the error). Fox will, in fact, participate as a gross player in any future Watchmen-related properties, although Snyder has already denied that he will participate in a prequel/sequel.

They should hang themselves right now if they're thinking about doing that. Seriously. Right now. I'm putting my trust in the movie because it really feels true to the comic, never mind the time limitations. But if they do anything like that.... Argh.

My Chemical Romance on Watchmen Soundtrack!

I don't know if this has been mentioned in this thread but My Chemical Romance are doing a song for the soundtrack, which is the main/credit song to the movie. They're doing a version of "Desolation Row" by Bob Dylan.

My Chemical Romance's version - short clip clicky

Bob Dylan's version - clicky

I like some of My Chemical Romance's stuff and it's a good cover which they've made there own but My Chemical Romances version doesn't sound like it should belong in the Watchmen soundtrack. imo.

About 20 years before the start of Watchmen itself, the Keene Act outlawed masked vigilantism and forced the members of the group to hang up their masks and retire, except for Comedian, who kept working for the government; Manhattan, who was always government-sponsored and Rorschach, who kept working outside the law. This gives you a little bit more background on those events, and has that quasi-fascist feeling that so fits the Watchmen universe.

[Source]

Zack Snyder is in Watchmen :p (Source)

snyderscameo.jpg&thumb_height=300

Did you know that director Zack Snyder actually appears on screen in Watchmen? Still photographer Clay Enos revealed to /Film’s own David Chen a photo of Snyder dressed up in military fatigues. As it turns out, the filmmaker has a small cameo in the scene where The Comedian is taking down enemies in Vietnam with a fire blast. Check out the full interview with Enos to learn other fun Watchmen tidbits in today’s Cool Stuff.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!