Formula One World Championship 2007  

204 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will be the world champion this year?

    • F. Alonso
      42
    • L. Hamilton
      67
    • G. Fisichella
      3
    • H. Kovalainen
      0
    • F. Massa
      18
    • K. Raikkonen
      70
    • J. Button
      2
    • R. Barrichello
      0
    • N. Heidfield
      0
    • someone else...
      2
  2. 2. Which team will win the Constructors Cup?

    • McLaren
      91
    • Renault
      7
    • Ferrari
      97
    • Honda
      1
    • BMW Sauber
      1
    • Toyota
      1
    • Red Bull
      1
    • Williams
      3
    • Torro Rosso
      1
    • Spyker / Super Aguri
      1


Recommended Posts

new "rumor" (they cast it as "according to our information" news) is that mclaren mercedes has to pay €100m + lose their points in the constructor's championship '07 (meaning they are not disqualified and the drivers still earn points)

this is whats being broadcasted on n-tv, a german news channel.

Glassed Silver:mac

new "rumor" (they cast it as "according to our information" news) is that mclaren mercedes has to pay ?100m + lose their points in the constructor's championship '07 (meaning they are not disqualified and the drivers still earn points)

this is whats being broadcasted on n-tv, a german news channel.Glassed Silver:maci>

Just heard that on BBC news (TV) too.

McLaren hit by constructors' ban

McLaren have been stripped of their points in the 2007 Formula One constructors' championship after the outcome of the 'spygate' row.

The team was also hit with a record $100m (?49.2m) fine but drivers Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso will be allowed to keep their points.

The team must also prove there is no Ferrari 'intellectual property' in its cars next eyar before they can race.

McLaren team chief Ron Dennis is due to speak at a 1915 BST news conference.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/motorsport...one/6991147.stm

============

McLaren loses all constructors' points

Thursday, 13, September, 2007, 18:38

The FIA World Motor Sport Council has disqualified McLaren from the 2007 constructors' championship and fined the team $100 million, but Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso can continue to battle for the drivers' crown.

After a day of deliberations at the hearing in Paris, the governing body decided to punish the team for breaking the sporting regulations by possessing confidential Ferrari data.

But while the decision to exclude McLaren from the constructors' contest hands that title to Ferrari, McLaren's drivers have not received any penalty.

Hamilton and Alonso's battle for the world championship will therefore continue unaffected in the remaining four rounds.

The team's $100 million fine is the largest in motorsport history.

McLaren will also have to present its 2008 car for examination by the FIA before the start of next season.

The team is due to address the media in Paris within the next hour.

http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=40651

Edited by Ahmz055

What I expected.

It makes a bit of a mockery of the application of rules however. In 2004, Toyota not only stole (not given, stole) Ferrari documents, but ran races with cars largely created from the documents! Punishment? None.

If this had been Spyker and Super Aguri, I doubt if we'd have even heard about it, let alone seen a punishment. :-/

What I expected.

It makes a bit of a mockery of the application of rules however. In 2004, Toyota not only stole (not given, stole) Ferrari documents, but ran races with cars largely created from the documents! Punishment? None.

If this had been Spyker and Super Aguri, I doubt if we'd have even heard about it, let alone seen a punishment. :-/

your wtf +1

i call this punishment ridiculous...

ive always hated the FiA... FiA, RIAA, MPAA, GEMA are in one row for me for the most annoying org's that i know of...

Glassed Silver:mac

I heard about this earlier today but i just watched a McLaren funding segment on ITV news, they spend $300 a year so $100 is a hell of a lot really... (i know it is a lot of money anyway but i always thought they spent more than that in F1)

Thats what Ecclestone said to ITV on Sunday.

He pretty much did. As far as I remember, he was only referring to the media attention. I doubt if the FIA would even get involved if it happened. Which is what annoys me most about the ruling - the rule hasn't been fairly applied to all teams.

McLaren has raised questions about the rival Renault team with Formula 1?s governing body, it emerged on Tuesday, as its own fate hangs in the balance ahead of Thursday?s FIA World Motor Sport Council hearing into the espionage case.

Rumours have been gathering pace since the Italian Grand Prix that the Woking squad is planning to argue as part of its defence case that if it is considered culpable and deserving of punishment then so should several rival teams.

http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=40629

A few days old, but interesting nonetheless. Hope something comes of it.

Eh, they were lucky to get only fined, banning Mclaren from F1 for this and next season would have been possible too and was very close according to Ecclestone's comments.

Comparing this to the Toyota scandal is apples/oranges deal, Toyota used several years old data and it did abysmally that season, clearly not gaining any benefit from stolen data. Mclaren got their hands on fresh data and even information about planned pit stops..

Comparing this to the Toyota scandal is apples/oranges deal, Toyota used several years old data and it did abysmally that season, clearly not gaining any benefit from stolen data.

They were still in possession of the data from another team (which is what McLaren are being punished for), so Toyota should have at least been disqualified and fined $100 million. Considering they actually built the car from them, they should have been banned for 2 years as McLaren were threatened.

Article 151c:

c) Any fraudulent conduct or any act prejudicial to the interests of any competition or to the interests of motor sport generally.

They may not have been fighting Ferrari for the championship, but the prize money goes all the way down to 10th. Unless all the teams around them in the championship also duplicated Ferraris, it could only be "prejudicial to the interests of any competition". Not to Ferrari, but to those around them fighting for the prize money still worth many millions.

They were still in possession of the data from another team (which is what McLaren are being punished for), so Toyota should have at least been disqualified and fined $100 million. Considering they actually built the car from them, they should have been banned for 2 years as McLaren were threatened.

Article 151c:

They may not have been fighting Ferrari for the championship, but the prize money goes all the way down to 10th. Unless all the teams around them in the championship also duplicated Ferraris, it could only be "prejudicial to the interests of any competition". Not to Ferrari, but to those around them fighting for the prize money still worth many millions.

QFT

Glassed Silver:mac

How the heck could Hamilton and Alonso still be allowed to battle for the world championship when they drive cars that use technology that was apparently spied on. Not that I have anything against these two, but it doesn't make any sense.

How the heck could Hamilton and Alonso still be allowed to battle for the world championship when they drive cars that use technology that was apparently spied on. Not that I have anything against these two, but it doesn't make any sense.

The use of information was not pertaining to parts on the car, but rather information about how to Ferrari got the most out of the Bridgestone tyres. Which McLaren designers/engineers used to get the McLaren working well on the Bridgestone tyres earlier in the season than they should have been able to.

Hamilton and Alonso were not punished as the drivers were offered immunity for giving evidence. Basically, being allowed to compete for the championship is the drivers "reward" for giving evidence.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qmmp 2.3.3 by Razvan Serea Qmmp (Qt-based MultiMedia Player) is a free, open-source audio player that delivers a classic music listening experience with a modern foundation. Inspired by the legendary Winamp, Qmmp features a familiar, customizable interface that supports both Winamp and XMMS skins, making it instantly recognizable to long-time users. It handles a wide variety of audio formats including MP3, OGG Vorbis, FLAC, WAV, AAC, and many others, ensuring smooth playback across diverse music libraries. In addition to basic playback, Qmmp offers advanced features such as a 10-band equalizer, crossfading, gapless playback, and audio visualization plugins. Users can manage playlists efficiently, create and save multiple lists, and even enable streaming from online sources. Plugin support extends the player’s capabilities, allowing integration of features like lyrics display, ReplayGain, and more. Built with the Qt framework, Qmmp runs smoothly and efficiently, making it ideal even for older systems. 10 great QMMP features you might not know: Global Hotkeys Support – Control playback using customizable system-wide keyboard shortcuts. CUE Sheet Support – Automatically detects and plays tracks from CUE files for full album playback. Last.fm Scrobbling – Integrated support for sending playback data to Last.fm. Audio CD Playback – Play music directly from audio CDs. Command Line Interface – Control Qmmp via command-line options for scripting or automation. System Tray Integration – Minimize to and control playback from the system tray. MPRIS Support – Integration with desktop media player controls via the MPRIS (Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification) interface. Spectrum Analyzer and Oscilloscope – Built-in visualizations for real-time audio feedback. Configurable Notifications – Custom pop-ups for track changes and playback status. Multiple Output Backends – Support for ALSA, PulseAudio, JACK, and more, offering flexible audio routing. Qmmp 2.3.3 changelog: fixed build with PipeWire versions less than 0.3.50; fixed settings dialog layout; fixed default CUE encoding; fixed possible null pointer dereference; fixed tracks order when added using drag and drop (2.3.3 only); fixed uninitialized structure usage; improved sid plugin: added libsidplayfp 3.0 support; added feature to build without residfp engine; fixed memory leak; fixed displaying audio information; updated Japanese translation (2.3.3 only). Download: Qmmp 64-bit | 24.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Qmmp 32-bit | 24.1 MB View: Qmmp Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.3 is out.
    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with adblockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Opera Air'. It still has some bloat, but nowhere near as much as Brave browser, for example. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. I have a system wide Adblocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the the web browser, but over the whole thing. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt adblocker because of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!