Formula One World Championship 2007  

204 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will be the world champion this year?

    • F. Alonso
      42
    • L. Hamilton
      67
    • G. Fisichella
      3
    • H. Kovalainen
      0
    • F. Massa
      18
    • K. Raikkonen
      70
    • J. Button
      2
    • R. Barrichello
      0
    • N. Heidfield
      0
    • someone else...
      2
  2. 2. Which team will win the Constructors Cup?

    • McLaren
      91
    • Renault
      7
    • Ferrari
      97
    • Honda
      1
    • BMW Sauber
      1
    • Toyota
      1
    • Red Bull
      1
    • Williams
      3
    • Torro Rosso
      1
    • Spyker / Super Aguri
      1


Recommended Posts

new "rumor" (they cast it as "according to our information" news) is that mclaren mercedes has to pay €100m + lose their points in the constructor's championship '07 (meaning they are not disqualified and the drivers still earn points)

this is whats being broadcasted on n-tv, a german news channel.

Glassed Silver:mac

new "rumor" (they cast it as "according to our information" news) is that mclaren mercedes has to pay ?100m + lose their points in the constructor's championship '07 (meaning they are not disqualified and the drivers still earn points)

this is whats being broadcasted on n-tv, a german news channel.Glassed Silver:maci>

Just heard that on BBC news (TV) too.

McLaren hit by constructors' ban

McLaren have been stripped of their points in the 2007 Formula One constructors' championship after the outcome of the 'spygate' row.

The team was also hit with a record $100m (?49.2m) fine but drivers Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso will be allowed to keep their points.

The team must also prove there is no Ferrari 'intellectual property' in its cars next eyar before they can race.

McLaren team chief Ron Dennis is due to speak at a 1915 BST news conference.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/motorsport...one/6991147.stm

============

McLaren loses all constructors' points

Thursday, 13, September, 2007, 18:38

The FIA World Motor Sport Council has disqualified McLaren from the 2007 constructors' championship and fined the team $100 million, but Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso can continue to battle for the drivers' crown.

After a day of deliberations at the hearing in Paris, the governing body decided to punish the team for breaking the sporting regulations by possessing confidential Ferrari data.

But while the decision to exclude McLaren from the constructors' contest hands that title to Ferrari, McLaren's drivers have not received any penalty.

Hamilton and Alonso's battle for the world championship will therefore continue unaffected in the remaining four rounds.

The team's $100 million fine is the largest in motorsport history.

McLaren will also have to present its 2008 car for examination by the FIA before the start of next season.

The team is due to address the media in Paris within the next hour.

http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=40651

Edited by Ahmz055

What I expected.

It makes a bit of a mockery of the application of rules however. In 2004, Toyota not only stole (not given, stole) Ferrari documents, but ran races with cars largely created from the documents! Punishment? None.

If this had been Spyker and Super Aguri, I doubt if we'd have even heard about it, let alone seen a punishment. :-/

What I expected.

It makes a bit of a mockery of the application of rules however. In 2004, Toyota not only stole (not given, stole) Ferrari documents, but ran races with cars largely created from the documents! Punishment? None.

If this had been Spyker and Super Aguri, I doubt if we'd have even heard about it, let alone seen a punishment. :-/

your wtf +1

i call this punishment ridiculous...

ive always hated the FiA... FiA, RIAA, MPAA, GEMA are in one row for me for the most annoying org's that i know of...

Glassed Silver:mac

I heard about this earlier today but i just watched a McLaren funding segment on ITV news, they spend $300 a year so $100 is a hell of a lot really... (i know it is a lot of money anyway but i always thought they spent more than that in F1)

Thats what Ecclestone said to ITV on Sunday.

He pretty much did. As far as I remember, he was only referring to the media attention. I doubt if the FIA would even get involved if it happened. Which is what annoys me most about the ruling - the rule hasn't been fairly applied to all teams.

McLaren has raised questions about the rival Renault team with Formula 1?s governing body, it emerged on Tuesday, as its own fate hangs in the balance ahead of Thursday?s FIA World Motor Sport Council hearing into the espionage case.

Rumours have been gathering pace since the Italian Grand Prix that the Woking squad is planning to argue as part of its defence case that if it is considered culpable and deserving of punishment then so should several rival teams.

http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=40629

A few days old, but interesting nonetheless. Hope something comes of it.

Eh, they were lucky to get only fined, banning Mclaren from F1 for this and next season would have been possible too and was very close according to Ecclestone's comments.

Comparing this to the Toyota scandal is apples/oranges deal, Toyota used several years old data and it did abysmally that season, clearly not gaining any benefit from stolen data. Mclaren got their hands on fresh data and even information about planned pit stops..

Comparing this to the Toyota scandal is apples/oranges deal, Toyota used several years old data and it did abysmally that season, clearly not gaining any benefit from stolen data.

They were still in possession of the data from another team (which is what McLaren are being punished for), so Toyota should have at least been disqualified and fined $100 million. Considering they actually built the car from them, they should have been banned for 2 years as McLaren were threatened.

Article 151c:

c) Any fraudulent conduct or any act prejudicial to the interests of any competition or to the interests of motor sport generally.

They may not have been fighting Ferrari for the championship, but the prize money goes all the way down to 10th. Unless all the teams around them in the championship also duplicated Ferraris, it could only be "prejudicial to the interests of any competition". Not to Ferrari, but to those around them fighting for the prize money still worth many millions.

They were still in possession of the data from another team (which is what McLaren are being punished for), so Toyota should have at least been disqualified and fined $100 million. Considering they actually built the car from them, they should have been banned for 2 years as McLaren were threatened.

Article 151c:

They may not have been fighting Ferrari for the championship, but the prize money goes all the way down to 10th. Unless all the teams around them in the championship also duplicated Ferraris, it could only be "prejudicial to the interests of any competition". Not to Ferrari, but to those around them fighting for the prize money still worth many millions.

QFT

Glassed Silver:mac

How the heck could Hamilton and Alonso still be allowed to battle for the world championship when they drive cars that use technology that was apparently spied on. Not that I have anything against these two, but it doesn't make any sense.

How the heck could Hamilton and Alonso still be allowed to battle for the world championship when they drive cars that use technology that was apparently spied on. Not that I have anything against these two, but it doesn't make any sense.

The use of information was not pertaining to parts on the car, but rather information about how to Ferrari got the most out of the Bridgestone tyres. Which McLaren designers/engineers used to get the McLaren working well on the Bridgestone tyres earlier in the season than they should have been able to.

Hamilton and Alonso were not punished as the drivers were offered immunity for giving evidence. Basically, being allowed to compete for the championship is the drivers "reward" for giving evidence.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have disabled it, but the app is still taking space. I have a Mac and it is only possible to disable Ai on that, but I think that bit does get rid of the AI components after a while. What we are told is that we agree to all this when we use the devices as it is in the end user agreements, their software, they can do what they like. I doubt that any bill will happen in the U.S, the government there are in league with big tech firms. The E.U maybe, they seem to have some guts when it comes to tech companies. The U.K is not in the E.U, but some things still affect us. Our government is as gutless when it comes to tech companies as the U.s government.
    • WebChangeMonitor 26.06 by Razvan Serea Monitors allows you to quickly check a number of web pages and tracks changes based on the content of the web pages. Allows to monitor several protocols, including HTTP and HTTPS. Allows to view and record differences. Available for Win7/10, Linux and others. WebChangeMonitor features: Allows monitoring of web pages and informs about content changes Indication of states of currently monitored items in the tool and taskbar Reporting as sound and/or email as well as log file or HTML log Several configuration / filter options Support all protocols, e.g. http, https Multi-threaded, running in the background Bulk-import and bulk-export of items (from/to CSV) to monitor Export of results to CSV file for further processing Allows running command on items states and/or showing diff (changes) of content with preferred diff-tool ...and many more! Open Source (C++, wxWidgets) Cross platform for Windows (7/10), Linux, RPi and Mac (if self-compiled) WebChangeMonitor 26.06 release notes: Release 26.06 brings mostly s but updates the underlying core infrastructure. A major compiler is used for both x86/x64 and WoA64 architectures. This also means that all core libraries are re-compiled accordingly which required some changes in the build scripts. One of the core libraries (cURL) has been updated to address vulnerabilities and a nasty linker error that was causing the need for a dedicated patch which could now be eliminated. Download: WebChangeMonitor 64-bit | Setup 64-bit | ~10.0 MB (Open Source) Download: WebChangeMonitor 32-bit | Setup 32-bit View: WebChangeMonitor Website | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.4 is out.
    • yea they change their app to high-system app so you can't disable with adb or within android, you gotta get root be able to do disable this high-system app now if you have locked down boot loader you screwed. samsung started locking down their store and their account app extremely annoying, account constantly nagging you to sign in... i disable all ai core apps and especially gemini since you can't uninstall anymore. i hope some day someone will present a bill force this companies quit locking down this damn phone especially the apps...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      257
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!