Opera 9.20 final


Recommended Posts

Does opera work with the same number of websites that firefox does? Or is it incompatible with lots of websites?

- Download Opera

- Install Opera

- Test your Websites with Opera

If you don't like Opera, uninstall Opera.

The main difference between Firefox and Opera is the perspective of how the user should be catered for. I want a fast web browser, an RSS client, an IRC client, an e-mail client, desktop widgets, and so on, without having to fiddle with dozens of downloads for software installers and extensions and all that other stuff. Most of these features are not enabled by default (RSS is enabled when an RSS link is clicked on, e-mail is enabled when an account is created, IRC is tucked away in the menu, and so on) and take up practically no space on the hard-drive so if you do not have a use for them they are neatly tucked away as if they were never there.

Opera also includes some nice productivity features that most browsers totally neglect. The "speak" function is incredibly helpful when trying to multi-task. One can open an e-mail, select all the text in it, and then click "speak" so Opera will read the e-mail to you and while you are listening you can do other things like work on Word documents, write replies on Neowin, and so on. You've also got a built-in panel for making notes. If you find some particular bit of information you think you'll find helpful later on, you can select the text on a webpage, "Copy to Note", and Opera will not only make a note with that text in it but the note also serves as a bookmark if you double-click on it. Opera's fullscreen mode works in Projection mode so websites can either show themselves normally or they can switch to projector-presentation mode. Thus, if you write an article webpage you can make use of the CSS projection mode to break the information up in chunks in fullscreen mode for use as presentations. Combine this with the fact it is easy to install Opera on a thumb-drive and you've got a portable internet suite, research tool, and presentation device. None of the features in themselves sound awesome but they can incredibly powerful when used together.

These are some of my main reasons for using Opera. One could probably get the same results in Firefox if one is willing to fiddle with extensions, separate applications, and so on but this is too much work and consumes too much space (especially if used on a cheap thumb-drive) to be considered worth-while when one can easily install Opera with this functionality out-of-the-box.

As for standards compliance, I think some people have been confused about the purpose of the Acid2 test. The Acid2 test was created to test the ability of browsers to correctly handle certain features of certain specifications. In no way is the Acid2 test comprehensive. There actually is no such thing as a browser that inerrantly follows all of the standards created by the W3C. All rendering engines, and thus browsers, have their own little quirks and deviations from the W3C standards.

I cannot say whether Opera works with as many sites as Firefox. I haven't actually done any tests. I haven't noticed any problems on the websites I visit though. Opera and Firefox are rather close to eachother in terms of standards compliance so there shouldn't be much deviation between them. Most of the problems I've ever noticed in Opera were incredibly tiny ones -- perhaps an element is 1px over too far in a certain direction -- or ones that you would only find if you were somebody messing with the latest CSS features in an exotic way as part of some experiment that was never intended to work in most browsers. In general browsing, you shouldn't notice much difference between the rendering behavior of Opera and Firefox.

I cannot say whether Opera works with as many sites as Firefox. I haven't actually done any tests. I haven't noticed any problems on the websites I visit though. Opera and Firefox are rather close to eachother in terms of standards compliance so there shouldn't be much deviation between them. Most of the problems I've ever noticed in Opera were incredibly tiny ones -- perhaps an element is 1px over too far in a certain direction -- or ones that you would only find if you were somebody messing with the latest CSS features in an exotic way as part of some experiment that was never intended to work in most browsers. In general browsing, you shouldn't notice much difference between the rendering behavior of Opera and Firefox.

Opera passes the Acid2 test and is 100% XHTML and web standards compliant (which is more than Firefox,) so anything that works properly in Firefox should also work properly in Opera. If it doesn't it's the fault of the webmaster for not using standardized, compliant code.

"Does opera work with the same number of websites that firefox does? Or is it incompatible with lots of websites?"

If You encounter problems with Opera rendering certain sites in vast majority of cases it will not be Opera's fault. In such case press "f12" on keyboard while You are on problematic site and choose "edit site preferences". Here You can pick which browsers will Opera emulate(IE, Firefox..). Use the mask option since by choosing that 95% of those sites will now render properly. Talk about bad site coding ^^, luckily Opera has the answer to that :)

Opera passes the Acid2 test and is 100% XHTML and web standards compliant (which is more than Firefox,) so anything that works properly in Firefox should also work properly in Opera. If it doesn't it's the fault of the webmaster for not using standardized, compliant code.

I know that Opera passes the Acid2 test (a good thing) but it's not a comprehensive test for total web standards compliance [1]. Unfortunately, Opera is not 100% XHTML compliant [2] or 100% CSS compliant [3]. Opera is close, however. Right now, there is no such thing as a fully standards compliant web browser.

Does opera work with the same number of websites that firefox does? Or is it incompatible with lots of websites?
- Download Opera

- Install Opera

- Test your Websites with Opera

If you don't like Opera, uninstall Opera.

And while you are at it report the sites that dont work to Opera. (Help>>>> Report a Site Problem)

I know that Opera passes the Acid2 test (a good thing) but it's not a comprehensive test for total web standards compliance [1]. Unfortunately, Opera is not 100% XHTML compliant [2] or 100% CSS compliant [3]. Opera is close, however. Right now, there is no such thing as a fully standards compliant web browser.

Some of W3C standards are not 100% clear how a specific feature should work thus making Opera's and Mozilla's implementations a bit different. These things are usually fixed along the way - therefore I must say that we (yes I work for Opera) are 100% W3C compliant. A couple of our guys are sitting in W3C group and working on standards and proposals. When it comes to CSS I have to say that there is no browser that is more CSS compliant than Opera since H?kon Wium Lie, who btw. is inventor of CSS works at Opera Software.

As previously said, unfortunatelly all pages do not work as they should on Opera due to bad coding and UA sniffing. If a page does not work as expected please report it to us with extensive description and how to reproduce (either via Help->Report a site problem or our OpenTheWeb team).

Difference between Opera and Firefox are mainly these:

* Opera exists for virtually every platform, Firefox does not

* Opera uses approximately two-thirds the amount of memory of Firefox

* Opera is optimized for speed and renders pages faster

* Opera Software strives to always have the latest bleeding edge technology built-in the browser (latest additions are canvas, SSE, SVG)

* Built-in tools for web developers

* All W3C standards are followed to 100%

Please remember I'm not a fanboy - just giving you the hard facts.

goodness.. that's pretty good stuff

I'm wondering about RSS in FF compared to Opera, why can't I just get a drop down list of what happend lets say on latest news on BBC while opera just takes me to a page where I have to scroll down to read everything.

note I'm a noob on RSS.

goodness.. that's pretty good stuff

I'm wondering about RSS in FF compared to Opera, why can't I just get a drop down list of what happend lets say on latest news on BBC while opera just takes me to a page where I have to scroll down to read everything.

note I'm a noob on RSS.

Yeah, I love the RSS "Live Bookmark" implementation in Firefox. It's the only way I'll use RSS feeds.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • WinToHDD 7.0.2.2 by Razvan Serea WinToHDD is a handy and useful software which allows you to install or reinstall Windows (Vista/2008 or later) without using a CD/DVD/USB drive. With this All-in-One Microsoft Windows deployment tool, you can easily reinstall Windows, install Windows onto disks other than the one where your Windows is installed, or clone existing Windows installation to other disk. Furthermore, you can use it to create a Windows installation USB containing all your Windows installation ISO files, then you can install Windows (Vista/2008 or later) from the same USB drive on both BIOS and UEFI computers. WinToHDD features: Install/reinstall Windows from ISO, WIM, ESD without using CD/DVD/USB.Improved Clone Windows to another disk without reinstalling Windows, apps.Improved Easily bypass Windows 11 system requirements (TPM 2.0, RAM, internet connection, etc).Improved Encrypt Windows partition with BitLocker when installing or cloning. Install any version of Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista, Server 2008 or later (64 & 32 bits) from same USB drive on both BIOS and UEFI computers. Fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Note: WinToHDD 7.0.2.2 changelog is not yet available. Download: WinToHDD 7.0.2.2 | 36.6 MB (Freemium) Links: Home Page | Free vs Pro Comparison | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hello, Version 19 of ESET's consumer offerings are 64-bit only. The 32-bit installers are for Version 18, which were announced in this Neowin article. In addition to ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ESET Internet Security, ESET Smart Security Premium, and ESET Security Ultimate, both ESET Safe Server and ESET Small Business Security v19.1.14.0 have been released as well. Direct download links: ESET Safe Server (x64) | ESET Safe Server (ARM64) ESET Small Business Security (x64) | ESET Small Business Security (ARM64) Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • I can name 10x that on why not to switch.... It's funny outlook/office are going towards web app wrappers, and then MS is now preaching native apps again.... ugh can we just pick a lane and stay in it
    • Absolutely NOBODY has suggested such a conclusion. I am affirming the sober reality check that AV2's overall market adoption will take longer than AV1's adoption rate -- which, by the way, is the whole point of the article! While PCI-SIG is productive (on paper), other WGs have created all sorts of confusing progress plans that consumers have tuned-out of their improvements... HTML/W3C, USB, HDMI, BT, WIFI (ieee802.11) as a few other groups where spec naming conventions, split progress paths, overlapping ambitions... I'm not critiquing the AV specs group; I'm simply affirming that adoption for AV2 faces headwinds beyond the macroeconomics of it all.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!