TRANSFORMERS Photos of the Bots from the movie


Recommended Posts

Check out this guy who made a video about how he hates the trailer. LMAO this guy needs to find a girl fast.

you guys should check out the response to that video. He rants about The Transformers trailer and he's right. That's what a Trailer/teaser should do. The other guy needs to go to hell.

They look soooo stupid. They look like some stupid insects or something. Why in the hell wouldn't they go with the classic, old school look? Obviously that's what the fans want. I won't even be bothering with this movie now, and I was a HUGE Transformers fan when I was a kid and have been looking forward to this movie for years. Idiots. Good way to make sure the film will totally bomb.

You guys forget that the movie needs to make money. So if alienating a few die hard fans by making the robots look ultra futuristic gets them a bigger audience, the choice is obvious.

Personally, I like the new images. As someone said on the last page, its their actions/character that are important.

would of been cool if they made Megatron at least transform into some type of gun but in proportion to the others.... like a huge CANON or something that can either move around on the ground or be carried by another decepticon.

AKA Galvatron :D

post-25729-1176926792_thumb.jpg

post-25729-1176926800.jpg

Check out this guy who made a video about how he hates the trailer. LMAO this guy needs to find a girl fast.

you guys should check out the response to that video. He rants about The Transformers trailer and he's right. That's what a Trailer/teaser should do. The other guy needs to go to hell.

While his video is a bit drawn out, he's absolutely right. This movie isn't a character study. It's not about reliving your childhood. It's about 30 foot robots beating the shiat out of each other. A huge budget and that rather simple premise pretty much guarantee box office success. Diehard fans can complain about "he's not a cab-over design", "bumblebee's not a VW", "where's unicron?", "megatron's not a gun", "why no energon?", etc etc etc, but guess what? no one really cares. Hell, even as a diehard fan myself, I don't care. I know all that stuff already. Why would I want to spend $10 and have the same 20 years of Transformers canon regurgitated back at me?

BTW, when one of the trailers showed what I presume to be Starscream fly under a bridge, transform, and flip up onto it, I kinda had a moment.

They look soooo stupid. They look like some stupid insects or something. Why in the hell wouldn't they go with the classic, old school look? Obviously that's what the fans want. I won't even be bothering with this movie now, and I was a HUGE Transformers fan when I was a kid and have been looking forward to this movie for years. Idiots. Good way to make sure the film will totally bomb.

it's because they are going for a realistic look.

They look soooo stupid. They look like some stupid insects or something. Why in the hell wouldn't they go with the classic, old school look? Obviously that's what the fans want. I won't even be bothering with this movie now, and I was a HUGE Transformers fan when I was a kid and have been looking forward to this movie for years. Idiots. Good way to make sure the film will totally bomb.

I think people that complain about things like this aren't really fans of 'Transformers' as a whole, but rather they're simply fans of a mid-80's cartoon. The Transformers universe is much bigger than just that one cartoon. In fact, it could be argued that the most 'un-Transformers' thing they could have done was to go back to a previous character design, as every incarnation of the Transformers has always used a new and modified character design for any returning characters. Sure, it's mostly an excuse to create new toys, but the toys are most of the fun when it comes to Transformers.

When Optimus Prime changes every 2 years, what is tradition, really?

"realistic" hah what a joke see Macross Pluss for realistic mecha

what? we're talking about the realism of the transformation, as in Megatron transforming into a handgun is not realistic. Soundwave transforming into a small boombox is not realistic. And by 'realistic' we obviously don't mean it's feasible for such a robot to exist, we're saying that if said robot did exist, its transformation into its alternate form is conceivable, given the construction and mass of the robot.

God, what a geek-out.

From what I've seen of the transformations in Macross, they're even less realistic than those of the G1 transformers. The jets just sort of turn into robots, there's no real transformation going on at all.

I think its more that most people who fondly remember the Transformers remember Season 1/2 and the movie(.) No one except the Japanese seem to care about what came later cause I know I sure don't. Everything put out after the first movie = lame so why bother with a continuation of something no one cares about anyway.

As such I think this film should be renamed to "Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers" to better represent the lame reincarnation that Bay has concocted.

I think its more that most people who fondly remember the Transformers remember Season 1/2 and the movie(.) No one except the Japanese seem to care about what came later cause I know I sure don't. Everything put out after the first movie = lame so why bother with a continuation of something no one cares about anyway.

As such I think this film should be renamed to "Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers" to better represent the lame reincarnation that Bay has concocted.

No one but the Japanese care about anything other than G1 because you don't care about anything other than G1. That's some heavy duty logic, right there.

Look around at the Transformers fan sites. Almost all of them deal with the entire Transformers universe, not just the G1 cartoon and movie. And it's not just Japanese fans.

you're a joke. Macross is an anime, how dare you compare it to Real Life/Live Action.

when they made Macross Pluss they asked people who knew what they were talking about so rly its better than live action

In order to capture the essence of aerial combat, Shoji Kawamori and the production staff traveled to Edwards Airbase in Palmdale, CA, to study and test-fly American fighter jets. They also used San Francisco, CA, Orlando, FL, and the Windmill Farm in Palm Springs, CA, as the basis for planet Eden's landscape designs.

source

when they made Macross Pluss they asked people who knew what they were talking about so rly its better than live action

source

Yes. The consulted experts on jet flight. Not experts on giant transforming robots. You're trying to inject a completely different topic into this thread, and it's not working.

Are you going to tell me, with a straight face, that the transformations from Macross Plus's dogfight scenes are more realistic that those shown in the Transformers trailers? That's what we're talking about, not the realism of jet flight.

Oh, and having a jet fire a hundred missiles at once? Not exactly realistic either.

All the arguing over how imaginary transforming robots should look more like cars and airplanes or look more "realistic" makes my brain hurt. You people need to get a grip.

I for one am glad Optimus doesn't look like an upright 18-wheeler with two windshields that look like breasts. The robots look more ominous, overpowering, and sinister then ever. It gives the movie a darker, more serious tone; which was the whole point to begin with (to draw a bigger audience).

I'll go see the movie. And, even if it's just a special effects buffet without a good screenplay or any character development I'll still enjoy it. I feel bad about all the people saying they'll skip it just because they have a stubborn view of how things should look.

Edited by spacer
when they made Macross Pluss they asked people who knew what they were talking about so rly its better than live action

source

do you have any idea what I was saying? I was saying visiually, the look of the Transformers. Not how they transform. The visual look will give a realistic feel to it.

Jack31081 : your pics didn't work.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!