TRANSFORMERS Photos of the Bots from the movie


Recommended Posts

Check out this guy who made a video about how he hates the trailer. LMAO this guy needs to find a girl fast.

you guys should check out the response to that video. He rants about The Transformers trailer and he's right. That's what a Trailer/teaser should do. The other guy needs to go to hell.

They look soooo stupid. They look like some stupid insects or something. Why in the hell wouldn't they go with the classic, old school look? Obviously that's what the fans want. I won't even be bothering with this movie now, and I was a HUGE Transformers fan when I was a kid and have been looking forward to this movie for years. Idiots. Good way to make sure the film will totally bomb.

You guys forget that the movie needs to make money. So if alienating a few die hard fans by making the robots look ultra futuristic gets them a bigger audience, the choice is obvious.

Personally, I like the new images. As someone said on the last page, its their actions/character that are important.

would of been cool if they made Megatron at least transform into some type of gun but in proportion to the others.... like a huge CANON or something that can either move around on the ground or be carried by another decepticon.

AKA Galvatron :D

post-25729-1176926792_thumb.jpg

post-25729-1176926800.jpg

Check out this guy who made a video about how he hates the trailer. LMAO this guy needs to find a girl fast.

you guys should check out the response to that video. He rants about The Transformers trailer and he's right. That's what a Trailer/teaser should do. The other guy needs to go to hell.

While his video is a bit drawn out, he's absolutely right. This movie isn't a character study. It's not about reliving your childhood. It's about 30 foot robots beating the shiat out of each other. A huge budget and that rather simple premise pretty much guarantee box office success. Diehard fans can complain about "he's not a cab-over design", "bumblebee's not a VW", "where's unicron?", "megatron's not a gun", "why no energon?", etc etc etc, but guess what? no one really cares. Hell, even as a diehard fan myself, I don't care. I know all that stuff already. Why would I want to spend $10 and have the same 20 years of Transformers canon regurgitated back at me?

BTW, when one of the trailers showed what I presume to be Starscream fly under a bridge, transform, and flip up onto it, I kinda had a moment.

They look soooo stupid. They look like some stupid insects or something. Why in the hell wouldn't they go with the classic, old school look? Obviously that's what the fans want. I won't even be bothering with this movie now, and I was a HUGE Transformers fan when I was a kid and have been looking forward to this movie for years. Idiots. Good way to make sure the film will totally bomb.

it's because they are going for a realistic look.

They look soooo stupid. They look like some stupid insects or something. Why in the hell wouldn't they go with the classic, old school look? Obviously that's what the fans want. I won't even be bothering with this movie now, and I was a HUGE Transformers fan when I was a kid and have been looking forward to this movie for years. Idiots. Good way to make sure the film will totally bomb.

I think people that complain about things like this aren't really fans of 'Transformers' as a whole, but rather they're simply fans of a mid-80's cartoon. The Transformers universe is much bigger than just that one cartoon. In fact, it could be argued that the most 'un-Transformers' thing they could have done was to go back to a previous character design, as every incarnation of the Transformers has always used a new and modified character design for any returning characters. Sure, it's mostly an excuse to create new toys, but the toys are most of the fun when it comes to Transformers.

When Optimus Prime changes every 2 years, what is tradition, really?

"realistic" hah what a joke see Macross Pluss for realistic mecha

what? we're talking about the realism of the transformation, as in Megatron transforming into a handgun is not realistic. Soundwave transforming into a small boombox is not realistic. And by 'realistic' we obviously don't mean it's feasible for such a robot to exist, we're saying that if said robot did exist, its transformation into its alternate form is conceivable, given the construction and mass of the robot.

God, what a geek-out.

From what I've seen of the transformations in Macross, they're even less realistic than those of the G1 transformers. The jets just sort of turn into robots, there's no real transformation going on at all.

I think its more that most people who fondly remember the Transformers remember Season 1/2 and the movie(.) No one except the Japanese seem to care about what came later cause I know I sure don't. Everything put out after the first movie = lame so why bother with a continuation of something no one cares about anyway.

As such I think this film should be renamed to "Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers" to better represent the lame reincarnation that Bay has concocted.

I think its more that most people who fondly remember the Transformers remember Season 1/2 and the movie(.) No one except the Japanese seem to care about what came later cause I know I sure don't. Everything put out after the first movie = lame so why bother with a continuation of something no one cares about anyway.

As such I think this film should be renamed to "Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers" to better represent the lame reincarnation that Bay has concocted.

No one but the Japanese care about anything other than G1 because you don't care about anything other than G1. That's some heavy duty logic, right there.

Look around at the Transformers fan sites. Almost all of them deal with the entire Transformers universe, not just the G1 cartoon and movie. And it's not just Japanese fans.

you're a joke. Macross is an anime, how dare you compare it to Real Life/Live Action.

when they made Macross Pluss they asked people who knew what they were talking about so rly its better than live action

In order to capture the essence of aerial combat, Shoji Kawamori and the production staff traveled to Edwards Airbase in Palmdale, CA, to study and test-fly American fighter jets. They also used San Francisco, CA, Orlando, FL, and the Windmill Farm in Palm Springs, CA, as the basis for planet Eden's landscape designs.

source

when they made Macross Pluss they asked people who knew what they were talking about so rly its better than live action

source

Yes. The consulted experts on jet flight. Not experts on giant transforming robots. You're trying to inject a completely different topic into this thread, and it's not working.

Are you going to tell me, with a straight face, that the transformations from Macross Plus's dogfight scenes are more realistic that those shown in the Transformers trailers? That's what we're talking about, not the realism of jet flight.

Oh, and having a jet fire a hundred missiles at once? Not exactly realistic either.

All the arguing over how imaginary transforming robots should look more like cars and airplanes or look more "realistic" makes my brain hurt. You people need to get a grip.

I for one am glad Optimus doesn't look like an upright 18-wheeler with two windshields that look like breasts. The robots look more ominous, overpowering, and sinister then ever. It gives the movie a darker, more serious tone; which was the whole point to begin with (to draw a bigger audience).

I'll go see the movie. And, even if it's just a special effects buffet without a good screenplay or any character development I'll still enjoy it. I feel bad about all the people saying they'll skip it just because they have a stubborn view of how things should look.

Edited by spacer
when they made Macross Pluss they asked people who knew what they were talking about so rly its better than live action

source

do you have any idea what I was saying? I was saying visiually, the look of the Transformers. Not how they transform. The visual look will give a realistic feel to it.

Jack31081 : your pics didn't work.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!