TRANSFORMERS Photos of the Bots from the movie


Recommended Posts

Check out this guy who made a video about how he hates the trailer. LMAO this guy needs to find a girl fast.

you guys should check out the response to that video. He rants about The Transformers trailer and he's right. That's what a Trailer/teaser should do. The other guy needs to go to hell.

They look soooo stupid. They look like some stupid insects or something. Why in the hell wouldn't they go with the classic, old school look? Obviously that's what the fans want. I won't even be bothering with this movie now, and I was a HUGE Transformers fan when I was a kid and have been looking forward to this movie for years. Idiots. Good way to make sure the film will totally bomb.

You guys forget that the movie needs to make money. So if alienating a few die hard fans by making the robots look ultra futuristic gets them a bigger audience, the choice is obvious.

Personally, I like the new images. As someone said on the last page, its their actions/character that are important.

would of been cool if they made Megatron at least transform into some type of gun but in proportion to the others.... like a huge CANON or something that can either move around on the ground or be carried by another decepticon.

AKA Galvatron :D

post-25729-1176926792_thumb.jpg

post-25729-1176926800.jpg

Check out this guy who made a video about how he hates the trailer. LMAO this guy needs to find a girl fast.

you guys should check out the response to that video. He rants about The Transformers trailer and he's right. That's what a Trailer/teaser should do. The other guy needs to go to hell.

While his video is a bit drawn out, he's absolutely right. This movie isn't a character study. It's not about reliving your childhood. It's about 30 foot robots beating the shiat out of each other. A huge budget and that rather simple premise pretty much guarantee box office success. Diehard fans can complain about "he's not a cab-over design", "bumblebee's not a VW", "where's unicron?", "megatron's not a gun", "why no energon?", etc etc etc, but guess what? no one really cares. Hell, even as a diehard fan myself, I don't care. I know all that stuff already. Why would I want to spend $10 and have the same 20 years of Transformers canon regurgitated back at me?

BTW, when one of the trailers showed what I presume to be Starscream fly under a bridge, transform, and flip up onto it, I kinda had a moment.

They look soooo stupid. They look like some stupid insects or something. Why in the hell wouldn't they go with the classic, old school look? Obviously that's what the fans want. I won't even be bothering with this movie now, and I was a HUGE Transformers fan when I was a kid and have been looking forward to this movie for years. Idiots. Good way to make sure the film will totally bomb.

it's because they are going for a realistic look.

They look soooo stupid. They look like some stupid insects or something. Why in the hell wouldn't they go with the classic, old school look? Obviously that's what the fans want. I won't even be bothering with this movie now, and I was a HUGE Transformers fan when I was a kid and have been looking forward to this movie for years. Idiots. Good way to make sure the film will totally bomb.

I think people that complain about things like this aren't really fans of 'Transformers' as a whole, but rather they're simply fans of a mid-80's cartoon. The Transformers universe is much bigger than just that one cartoon. In fact, it could be argued that the most 'un-Transformers' thing they could have done was to go back to a previous character design, as every incarnation of the Transformers has always used a new and modified character design for any returning characters. Sure, it's mostly an excuse to create new toys, but the toys are most of the fun when it comes to Transformers.

When Optimus Prime changes every 2 years, what is tradition, really?

"realistic" hah what a joke see Macross Pluss for realistic mecha

what? we're talking about the realism of the transformation, as in Megatron transforming into a handgun is not realistic. Soundwave transforming into a small boombox is not realistic. And by 'realistic' we obviously don't mean it's feasible for such a robot to exist, we're saying that if said robot did exist, its transformation into its alternate form is conceivable, given the construction and mass of the robot.

God, what a geek-out.

From what I've seen of the transformations in Macross, they're even less realistic than those of the G1 transformers. The jets just sort of turn into robots, there's no real transformation going on at all.

I think its more that most people who fondly remember the Transformers remember Season 1/2 and the movie(.) No one except the Japanese seem to care about what came later cause I know I sure don't. Everything put out after the first movie = lame so why bother with a continuation of something no one cares about anyway.

As such I think this film should be renamed to "Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers" to better represent the lame reincarnation that Bay has concocted.

I think its more that most people who fondly remember the Transformers remember Season 1/2 and the movie(.) No one except the Japanese seem to care about what came later cause I know I sure don't. Everything put out after the first movie = lame so why bother with a continuation of something no one cares about anyway.

As such I think this film should be renamed to "Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers" to better represent the lame reincarnation that Bay has concocted.

No one but the Japanese care about anything other than G1 because you don't care about anything other than G1. That's some heavy duty logic, right there.

Look around at the Transformers fan sites. Almost all of them deal with the entire Transformers universe, not just the G1 cartoon and movie. And it's not just Japanese fans.

you're a joke. Macross is an anime, how dare you compare it to Real Life/Live Action.

when they made Macross Pluss they asked people who knew what they were talking about so rly its better than live action

In order to capture the essence of aerial combat, Shoji Kawamori and the production staff traveled to Edwards Airbase in Palmdale, CA, to study and test-fly American fighter jets. They also used San Francisco, CA, Orlando, FL, and the Windmill Farm in Palm Springs, CA, as the basis for planet Eden's landscape designs.

source

when they made Macross Pluss they asked people who knew what they were talking about so rly its better than live action

source

Yes. The consulted experts on jet flight. Not experts on giant transforming robots. You're trying to inject a completely different topic into this thread, and it's not working.

Are you going to tell me, with a straight face, that the transformations from Macross Plus's dogfight scenes are more realistic that those shown in the Transformers trailers? That's what we're talking about, not the realism of jet flight.

Oh, and having a jet fire a hundred missiles at once? Not exactly realistic either.

All the arguing over how imaginary transforming robots should look more like cars and airplanes or look more "realistic" makes my brain hurt. You people need to get a grip.

I for one am glad Optimus doesn't look like an upright 18-wheeler with two windshields that look like breasts. The robots look more ominous, overpowering, and sinister then ever. It gives the movie a darker, more serious tone; which was the whole point to begin with (to draw a bigger audience).

I'll go see the movie. And, even if it's just a special effects buffet without a good screenplay or any character development I'll still enjoy it. I feel bad about all the people saying they'll skip it just because they have a stubborn view of how things should look.

Edited by spacer
when they made Macross Pluss they asked people who knew what they were talking about so rly its better than live action

source

do you have any idea what I was saying? I was saying visiually, the look of the Transformers. Not how they transform. The visual look will give a realistic feel to it.

Jack31081 : your pics didn't work.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      227
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!