Jack Thompson Blames Bill Gates for VT Shooting


Recommended Posts

OK... :blink: . Bill Gates, the richest man in the world, one who donates almost half of his personal fortune for good causes, accused by a person who strongly believes that violent games cause violent behaviour even though countless research has been made otherwise that provide that it is untrue.

You know where my vote is for.

Scirwode

I tried to not read this thread; I've seen it every time I've been on neowin for the past day or so, but I finally yeilded. And now... I know why I didn't; I am actually angry.

a. Ridiculously over-zealous christians tend to bug me a little anyway.

b. What the heck does he have to do with anything here?

c. HE IS WRONG!

How is it that the biggest idiots tend to receive the most media attention!?

Chris

Alright guys, I need you all to log onto my CS Server named "School Killing Simulation". Alright, you go over by the water fountain, you go over by the desk, you pretend to be the teacher. Alright... just stand there... good good....

How the hell can you even train to do that? Anyone who has fired a real gun knows that it is pretty much nothing like it is in the video games, ESPECIALLY Counter-Strike and Halo. This guy is a douche, and gives Christians all over the world a bad name. He needs to get his facts straight before thinking that he is a crusader, or hopefully he'll get his own "crusader" in a prison shower.

Every single pc hardware, software manufacturer and game dev's/producer/publisher, along with console makers, designers, producers, game dev's/producer/publisher should all go to court to BAN Jack Thompson from interacting, viewing, or commenting upon ANY of their products, plans, or intellectual property. On the grounds that he makes irrational assumptions based on ill-founded logic that could potentially harm the companies reputation and future earnings

Bill Gates really should sue him. He's got all kinds of evidence on him for liable.

A nobody that pretty much threatened to sue the richest guy in the world and is blaming him for the VT incident when he has nothing at all to do with the game that this guy is trying to blame it on :laugh: and he did it all over the media where's it was all recorded and even had the nerve to send him a letter.

Smart move Jack Thompson (Y)

clx has a good idea. All gaming/PC/hardware companies should group together and bring a lawsuit on him. He'd shut up then I'd bet.

If the court case between him and Take 2 was still going on I bet he wouldn't have done this. There was a chance he was going to jail and they dropped that. Now he's found some new targets: Bill Gates, Counter Strike and Valve could also get into it since it's their game he's blaming. He was close to going to jail over GTA so he picks a new game.

I really hope someone starts to sue him soon.

He's no man of God. He's nothing but an attention ###### making all the money he can off peoples deaths. No respect at all towards any of them.

heh!

I'd love to know Jack Thompson's past with the digital age.

You telling me he has NEVER played a videogame?

I'd love to see what is/has been on his hard-drive.

What consoles he has/used to have.

Does he have any kids? Does he know what they do on videogames around their mates' houses?

I bet he would turn out to be one REAL hypocrit.

He's probably just angry because everytime he goes onto a CS server he gets called n00b, and then he blames everyone for hacking...lol

:o and maybe the terrorists behind 9/11 trained on flight simulator!

Well actually, the hijackers with the task of piloting the airplanes didn't only go for flying lessons down in Florida but also trained flight route and approach on Flight Simulator... That's hardly Microsoft's fault however, as I'm sure they would have carried on with their plans anyways.

Jack Thompson only comes up with this rubbish in order for him to become famous and earn more $$$.

Really quite sickening!

Jack thompson, you are an idiot.

I think what's worse though, is that he was on TV the day of the shooting. He doesn't even give people time before he tries to shove his propaganda down people's mouths. Thats just wrong to me. Using something like this to force your ideas onto people. Especially when their as wrong as JT's ideas.

Every single pc hardware, software manufacturer and game dev's/producer/publisher, along with console makers, designers, producers, game dev's/producer/publisher should all go to court to BAN Jack Thompson from interacting, viewing, or commenting upon ANY of their products, plans, or intellectual property. On the grounds that he makes irrational assumptions based on ill-founded logic that could potentially harm the companies reputation and future earnings

No no no. Here's what they should do. Lock Jack Thompson in a windowless room that has nothing in it but a TV, a gun, and one bullet. Have the TV continously show compiled footage from every shooter and FPS ever made and things will take care of themselves.

I also think Jack Thompson singled out CS only because after being AWPed so many times he went crazy.

No no no. Here's what they should do. Lock Jack Thompson in a windowless room that has nothing in it but a TV, a gun, and one bullet. Have the TV continously show compiled footage from every shooter and FPS ever made and things will take care of themselves.

I also think Jack Thompson singled out CS only because after being AWPed so many times he went crazy.

hehe.. I'd shoot the tv to make it stop *L*

No no no. Here's what they should do. Lock Jack Thompson in a windowless room that has nothing in it but a TV, a gun, and one bullet. Have the TV continously show compiled footage from every shooter and FPS ever made and things will take care of themselves.

guess you didn't think of the fact that he can just shoot the tv so it goes black :p

hehe.. I'd shoot the tv to make it stop *L*
guess you didn't think of the fact that he can just shoot the tv so it goes black :p

Well obviously the TV would be behind bulletproof glass. Come on now people. :p

The thing is many people who are eager to criticize Jack Thompson for capitalizing on the tragedy, are likely to have either called for increased gun control or less gun control. Jack Thompson just thinks he's right, it doesn't mean he's capitalizing on it more than anyone else. If the killer did play these video games thats something to mention. It wouldn't be surprising if he were attracted to them, given his interest in violent movies and watching wrestling.

I don't agree that violent games or entertainment should be banned. I think its reasonable though that there are restrictions on how they're marketed, whether ratings or what else. The thing is when you say there should be restrictions on how they're marketed, people go apeshit as if you're saying you want to ban them.

Edited by brianshapiro
The thing is many people who are eager to criticize Jack Thompson for capitalizing on the tragedy, are likely to have either called for increased gun control or less gun control. Jack Thompson just thinks he's right, it doesn't mean he's capitalizing on it more than anyone else.

Then you dont know much about Jack Thompson, any time a teenager commits murder he is all over it like flies around s**t instantly blaming video games, he has a personal vendetta against Take Two and vowed to take them down. The guy is an attention ###### pure and simple.

If the killer did play these video games thats something to mention. It wouldn't be surprising if he were attracted to them, given his interest in violent movies and watching wrestling.

Its already been prooved he wasnt into games, the search warrant issued found NO TRACE of any video games, consoles, or relevant software, he had a computer and he regularly wrote plays on Microsoft Word. Can you "train" to kill people using Word?

I don't agree that violent games or entertainment should be banned. I think its reasonable though that there are restrictions on how they're marketed, whether ratings or what else. The thing is when you say there should be restrictions on how they're marketed, people go apeshit as if you're saying you want to ban them.

This has nothing to do with minors playing games, its the psychopaths and the Mentally Unstable people that not only use games, but movies and tv shows. How would you regulate this?

This has nothing to do with minors playing games, its the psychopaths and the Mentally Unstable people that not only use games, but movies and tv shows. How would you regulate this?

Oh sure it does, for instance, if you erode a parents ability to know what their child is exposed to you make it harder for them to parent, and if its harder to parent, then kids who are either unstable or have emotional issues will either not get help or will latch on to outlets that will feed their emotional problems. --- and then, this is not just an issue with parents and kids, but teachers and kids and psychologists and kids. and then its not even about kids, but with how the culture provides outlets for adults, even to the point that it becomes so easy to make a market around stupid clones of shooter games, because FPSs are like the porn of video games.

So anyway, I don't want any bans. I just think there are some common sense measures that consumers want. For instance, consumers want ratings for instance and they want the ratings to be done correctly, so there's correct advertising, for whatever reasons. I think stores that market to certain audiences should also be understood to only carry certain ratings. But if you even mention that opinion on a video game forum, they'll treat you as a villain, with an almost paranoid hysteria. Calm down, your games aren't going to be taken away.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!